Cargando…

Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 556 patients

BACKGROUND: The safety of pancreatic resection for elderly patients is still controversial. We examined the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients aged 75 years or more undergoing pancreatic resection. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatic resection were studied retrospectively and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ansari, Daniel, Aronsson, Linus, Fredriksson, Joakim, Andersson, Bodil, Andersson, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27065736
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0016
_version_ 1782423197713432576
author Ansari, Daniel
Aronsson, Linus
Fredriksson, Joakim
Andersson, Bodil
Andersson, Roland
author_facet Ansari, Daniel
Aronsson, Linus
Fredriksson, Joakim
Andersson, Bodil
Andersson, Roland
author_sort Ansari, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The safety of pancreatic resection for elderly patients is still controversial. We examined the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients aged 75 years or more undergoing pancreatic resection. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatic resection were studied retrospectively and the outcomes were compared between patients aged <75 and ≥75 years. RESULTS: Of the 556 patients enrolled, 78 (14%) were ≥75 years old. Elderly patients had significantly more co-morbidities, especially cardiovascular pathology (P=0.005). Also, elderly patients had significantly lower body mass index prior to surgery (P=0.005). There were no significant differences in terms of surgical procedures and tumor types between age groups. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade A was significantly lower in the elderly group (P=0.022), but no significant differences were noted in the overall morbidity or the incidence of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications or septic complications. The 30-day mortality rate was similar between groups (0.8% vs. 1.3%; P=0.532). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic resection is a safe option for selected elderly patients. Our study confirms that age alone should not preclude potentially curative surgical therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4805744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48057442016-04-08 Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 556 patients Ansari, Daniel Aronsson, Linus Fredriksson, Joakim Andersson, Bodil Andersson, Roland Ann Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND: The safety of pancreatic resection for elderly patients is still controversial. We examined the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients aged 75 years or more undergoing pancreatic resection. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatic resection were studied retrospectively and the outcomes were compared between patients aged <75 and ≥75 years. RESULTS: Of the 556 patients enrolled, 78 (14%) were ≥75 years old. Elderly patients had significantly more co-morbidities, especially cardiovascular pathology (P=0.005). Also, elderly patients had significantly lower body mass index prior to surgery (P=0.005). There were no significant differences in terms of surgical procedures and tumor types between age groups. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade A was significantly lower in the elderly group (P=0.022), but no significant differences were noted in the overall morbidity or the incidence of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications or septic complications. The 30-day mortality rate was similar between groups (0.8% vs. 1.3%; P=0.532). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic resection is a safe option for selected elderly patients. Our study confirms that age alone should not preclude potentially curative surgical therapy. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4805744/ /pubmed/27065736 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0016 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ansari, Daniel
Aronsson, Linus
Fredriksson, Joakim
Andersson, Bodil
Andersson, Roland
Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 556 patients
title Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 556 patients
title_full Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 556 patients
title_fullStr Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 556 patients
title_full_unstemmed Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 556 patients
title_short Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 556 patients
title_sort safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 556 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27065736
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0016
work_keys_str_mv AT ansaridaniel safetyofpancreaticresectionintheelderlyaretrospectiveanalysisof556patients
AT aronssonlinus safetyofpancreaticresectionintheelderlyaretrospectiveanalysisof556patients
AT fredrikssonjoakim safetyofpancreaticresectionintheelderlyaretrospectiveanalysisof556patients
AT anderssonbodil safetyofpancreaticresectionintheelderlyaretrospectiveanalysisof556patients
AT anderssonroland safetyofpancreaticresectionintheelderlyaretrospectiveanalysisof556patients