Cargando…
Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study?
BACKGROUND: The “Watch Me Grow” (WMG) study examines the current developmental surveillance system in South West Sydney. This paper describes the establishment of the study birth cohort, including the recruitment processes, representativeness, follow-up and participants’ baseline risk for future dev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0582-1 |
_version_ | 1782423232284983296 |
---|---|
author | Woolfenden, Susan Eapen, Valsamma Axelsson, Emma Hendry, Alexandra Jalaludin, Bin Dissanayake, Cheryl Overs, Bronwyn Descallar, Joseph Eastwood, John Einfeld, Stewart Silove, Natalie Short, Kate Beasley, Deborah Črnčec, Rudi Murphy, Elisabeth Williams, Katrina |
author_facet | Woolfenden, Susan Eapen, Valsamma Axelsson, Emma Hendry, Alexandra Jalaludin, Bin Dissanayake, Cheryl Overs, Bronwyn Descallar, Joseph Eastwood, John Einfeld, Stewart Silove, Natalie Short, Kate Beasley, Deborah Črnčec, Rudi Murphy, Elisabeth Williams, Katrina |
author_sort | Woolfenden, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The “Watch Me Grow” (WMG) study examines the current developmental surveillance system in South West Sydney. This paper describes the establishment of the study birth cohort, including the recruitment processes, representativeness, follow-up and participants’ baseline risk for future developmental risk. METHODS: Newborn infants and their parents were recruited from two public hospital postnatal wards and through child health nurses during the years 2011–2013. Data was obtained through a detailed participant questionnaire and linked with the participant’s electronic medical record (EMR). Representativeness was determined by Chi-square analyses of the available clinical, psychosocial and sociodemographic EMR data, comparing the WMG participants to eligible non-participants. Reasons for non-participation were also elicited. Participant characteristics were examined in six, 12, and 18-month follow-ups. RESULTS: The number of infants recruited totalled 2,025, with 50 % of those approached agreeing to participate. Reasons for parents not participating included: lack of interest, being too busy, having plans to relocate, language barriers, participation in other research projects, and privacy concerns. The WMG cohort was broadly representative of the culturally diverse and socially disadvantaged local population from which it was sampled. Of the original 2025 participants enrolled at birth, participants with PEDS outcome data available at follow-up were: 792 (39 %) at six months, 649 (32 %) at 12 months, and 565 (28 %) at 18 months. Participants with greater psychosocial risk were less likely to have follow-up outcome data. Almost 40 % of infants in the baseline cohort were exposed to at least two risk factors known to be associated with developmental risk. CONCLUSIONS: The WMG study birth cohort is a valuable resource for health services due to the inclusion of participants from vulnerable populations, despite there being challenges in being able to actively follow-up this population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4806415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48064152016-03-24 Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study? Woolfenden, Susan Eapen, Valsamma Axelsson, Emma Hendry, Alexandra Jalaludin, Bin Dissanayake, Cheryl Overs, Bronwyn Descallar, Joseph Eastwood, John Einfeld, Stewart Silove, Natalie Short, Kate Beasley, Deborah Črnčec, Rudi Murphy, Elisabeth Williams, Katrina BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The “Watch Me Grow” (WMG) study examines the current developmental surveillance system in South West Sydney. This paper describes the establishment of the study birth cohort, including the recruitment processes, representativeness, follow-up and participants’ baseline risk for future developmental risk. METHODS: Newborn infants and their parents were recruited from two public hospital postnatal wards and through child health nurses during the years 2011–2013. Data was obtained through a detailed participant questionnaire and linked with the participant’s electronic medical record (EMR). Representativeness was determined by Chi-square analyses of the available clinical, psychosocial and sociodemographic EMR data, comparing the WMG participants to eligible non-participants. Reasons for non-participation were also elicited. Participant characteristics were examined in six, 12, and 18-month follow-ups. RESULTS: The number of infants recruited totalled 2,025, with 50 % of those approached agreeing to participate. Reasons for parents not participating included: lack of interest, being too busy, having plans to relocate, language barriers, participation in other research projects, and privacy concerns. The WMG cohort was broadly representative of the culturally diverse and socially disadvantaged local population from which it was sampled. Of the original 2025 participants enrolled at birth, participants with PEDS outcome data available at follow-up were: 792 (39 %) at six months, 649 (32 %) at 12 months, and 565 (28 %) at 18 months. Participants with greater psychosocial risk were less likely to have follow-up outcome data. Almost 40 % of infants in the baseline cohort were exposed to at least two risk factors known to be associated with developmental risk. CONCLUSIONS: The WMG study birth cohort is a valuable resource for health services due to the inclusion of participants from vulnerable populations, despite there being challenges in being able to actively follow-up this population. BioMed Central 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4806415/ /pubmed/27013220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0582-1 Text en © Woolfenden et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Woolfenden, Susan Eapen, Valsamma Axelsson, Emma Hendry, Alexandra Jalaludin, Bin Dissanayake, Cheryl Overs, Bronwyn Descallar, Joseph Eastwood, John Einfeld, Stewart Silove, Natalie Short, Kate Beasley, Deborah Črnčec, Rudi Murphy, Elisabeth Williams, Katrina Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study? |
title | Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study? |
title_full | Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study? |
title_fullStr | Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study? |
title_full_unstemmed | Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study? |
title_short | Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study? |
title_sort | who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “watch me grow” study? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0582-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woolfendensusan whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT eapenvalsamma whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT axelssonemma whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT hendryalexandra whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT jalaludinbin whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT dissanayakecheryl whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT oversbronwyn whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT descallarjoseph whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT eastwoodjohn whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT einfeldstewart whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT silovenatalie whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT shortkate whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT beasleydeborah whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT crncecrudi whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT murphyelisabeth whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT williamskatrina whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy AT whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy |