Cargando…

Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study?

BACKGROUND: The “Watch Me Grow” (WMG) study examines the current developmental surveillance system in South West Sydney. This paper describes the establishment of the study birth cohort, including the recruitment processes, representativeness, follow-up and participants’ baseline risk for future dev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woolfenden, Susan, Eapen, Valsamma, Axelsson, Emma, Hendry, Alexandra, Jalaludin, Bin, Dissanayake, Cheryl, Overs, Bronwyn, Descallar, Joseph, Eastwood, John, Einfeld, Stewart, Silove, Natalie, Short, Kate, Beasley, Deborah, Črnčec, Rudi, Murphy, Elisabeth, Williams, Katrina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0582-1
_version_ 1782423232284983296
author Woolfenden, Susan
Eapen, Valsamma
Axelsson, Emma
Hendry, Alexandra
Jalaludin, Bin
Dissanayake, Cheryl
Overs, Bronwyn
Descallar, Joseph
Eastwood, John
Einfeld, Stewart
Silove, Natalie
Short, Kate
Beasley, Deborah
Črnčec, Rudi
Murphy, Elisabeth
Williams, Katrina
author_facet Woolfenden, Susan
Eapen, Valsamma
Axelsson, Emma
Hendry, Alexandra
Jalaludin, Bin
Dissanayake, Cheryl
Overs, Bronwyn
Descallar, Joseph
Eastwood, John
Einfeld, Stewart
Silove, Natalie
Short, Kate
Beasley, Deborah
Črnčec, Rudi
Murphy, Elisabeth
Williams, Katrina
author_sort Woolfenden, Susan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The “Watch Me Grow” (WMG) study examines the current developmental surveillance system in South West Sydney. This paper describes the establishment of the study birth cohort, including the recruitment processes, representativeness, follow-up and participants’ baseline risk for future developmental risk. METHODS: Newborn infants and their parents were recruited from two public hospital postnatal wards and through child health nurses during the years 2011–2013. Data was obtained through a detailed participant questionnaire and linked with the participant’s electronic medical record (EMR). Representativeness was determined by Chi-square analyses of the available clinical, psychosocial and sociodemographic EMR data, comparing the WMG participants to eligible non-participants. Reasons for non-participation were also elicited. Participant characteristics were examined in six, 12, and 18-month follow-ups. RESULTS: The number of infants recruited totalled 2,025, with 50 % of those approached agreeing to participate. Reasons for parents not participating included: lack of interest, being too busy, having plans to relocate, language barriers, participation in other research projects, and privacy concerns. The WMG cohort was broadly representative of the culturally diverse and socially disadvantaged local population from which it was sampled. Of the original 2025 participants enrolled at birth, participants with PEDS outcome data available at follow-up were: 792 (39 %) at six months, 649 (32 %) at 12 months, and 565 (28 %) at 18 months. Participants with greater psychosocial risk were less likely to have follow-up outcome data. Almost 40 % of infants in the baseline cohort were exposed to at least two risk factors known to be associated with developmental risk. CONCLUSIONS: The WMG study birth cohort is a valuable resource for health services due to the inclusion of participants from vulnerable populations, despite there being challenges in being able to actively follow-up this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4806415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48064152016-03-24 Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study? Woolfenden, Susan Eapen, Valsamma Axelsson, Emma Hendry, Alexandra Jalaludin, Bin Dissanayake, Cheryl Overs, Bronwyn Descallar, Joseph Eastwood, John Einfeld, Stewart Silove, Natalie Short, Kate Beasley, Deborah Črnčec, Rudi Murphy, Elisabeth Williams, Katrina BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The “Watch Me Grow” (WMG) study examines the current developmental surveillance system in South West Sydney. This paper describes the establishment of the study birth cohort, including the recruitment processes, representativeness, follow-up and participants’ baseline risk for future developmental risk. METHODS: Newborn infants and their parents were recruited from two public hospital postnatal wards and through child health nurses during the years 2011–2013. Data was obtained through a detailed participant questionnaire and linked with the participant’s electronic medical record (EMR). Representativeness was determined by Chi-square analyses of the available clinical, psychosocial and sociodemographic EMR data, comparing the WMG participants to eligible non-participants. Reasons for non-participation were also elicited. Participant characteristics were examined in six, 12, and 18-month follow-ups. RESULTS: The number of infants recruited totalled 2,025, with 50 % of those approached agreeing to participate. Reasons for parents not participating included: lack of interest, being too busy, having plans to relocate, language barriers, participation in other research projects, and privacy concerns. The WMG cohort was broadly representative of the culturally diverse and socially disadvantaged local population from which it was sampled. Of the original 2025 participants enrolled at birth, participants with PEDS outcome data available at follow-up were: 792 (39 %) at six months, 649 (32 %) at 12 months, and 565 (28 %) at 18 months. Participants with greater psychosocial risk were less likely to have follow-up outcome data. Almost 40 % of infants in the baseline cohort were exposed to at least two risk factors known to be associated with developmental risk. CONCLUSIONS: The WMG study birth cohort is a valuable resource for health services due to the inclusion of participants from vulnerable populations, despite there being challenges in being able to actively follow-up this population. BioMed Central 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4806415/ /pubmed/27013220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0582-1 Text en © Woolfenden et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Woolfenden, Susan
Eapen, Valsamma
Axelsson, Emma
Hendry, Alexandra
Jalaludin, Bin
Dissanayake, Cheryl
Overs, Bronwyn
Descallar, Joseph
Eastwood, John
Einfeld, Stewart
Silove, Natalie
Short, Kate
Beasley, Deborah
Črnčec, Rudi
Murphy, Elisabeth
Williams, Katrina
Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study?
title Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study?
title_full Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study?
title_fullStr Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study?
title_full_unstemmed Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study?
title_short Who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “Watch Me Grow” study?
title_sort who is our cohort: recruitment, representativeness, baseline risk and retention in the “watch me grow” study?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0582-1
work_keys_str_mv AT woolfendensusan whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT eapenvalsamma whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT axelssonemma whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT hendryalexandra whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT jalaludinbin whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT dissanayakecheryl whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT oversbronwyn whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT descallarjoseph whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT eastwoodjohn whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT einfeldstewart whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT silovenatalie whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT shortkate whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT beasleydeborah whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT crncecrudi whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT murphyelisabeth whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT williamskatrina whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy
AT whoisourcohortrecruitmentrepresentativenessbaselineriskandretentioninthewatchmegrowstudy