Cargando…
An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis
BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven biological efficacy to reduce the sexual acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The PROUD study found that PrEP conferred higher protection than in placebo-controlled trials, reducing HIV incidence by 86 % in a population with se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4 |
_version_ | 1782423238464241664 |
---|---|
author | Dolling, David I. Desai, Monica McOwan, Alan Gilson, Richard Clarke, Amanda Fisher, Martin Schembri, Gabriel Sullivan, Ann K. Mackie, Nicola Reeves, Iain Portman, Mags Saunders, John Fox, Julie Bayley, Jake Brady, Michael Bowman, Christine Lacey, Charles J. Taylor, Stephen White, David Antonucci, Simone Gafos, Mitzy McCormack, Sheena Gill, Owen N. Dunn, David T. Nardone, Anthony |
author_facet | Dolling, David I. Desai, Monica McOwan, Alan Gilson, Richard Clarke, Amanda Fisher, Martin Schembri, Gabriel Sullivan, Ann K. Mackie, Nicola Reeves, Iain Portman, Mags Saunders, John Fox, Julie Bayley, Jake Brady, Michael Bowman, Christine Lacey, Charles J. Taylor, Stephen White, David Antonucci, Simone Gafos, Mitzy McCormack, Sheena Gill, Owen N. Dunn, David T. Nardone, Anthony |
author_sort | Dolling, David I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven biological efficacy to reduce the sexual acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The PROUD study found that PrEP conferred higher protection than in placebo-controlled trials, reducing HIV incidence by 86 % in a population with seven-fold higher HIV incidence than expected. We present the baseline characteristics of the PROUD study population and place the findings in the context of national sexual health clinic data. METHODS: The PROUD study was designed to explore the real-world effectiveness of PrEP (tenofovir-emtricitabine) by randomising HIV-negative gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) to receive open-label PrEP immediately or after a deferral period of 12 months. At enrolment, participants self-completed two baseline questionnaires collecting information on demographics, sexual behaviour and lifestyle in the last 30 and 90 days. These data were compared to data from HIV-negative GMSM attending sexual health clinics in 2013, collated by Public Health England using the genitourinary medicine clinic activity database (GUMCAD). RESULTS: The median age of participants was 35 (IQR: 29–43). Typically participants were white (81 %), educated at a university level (61 %) and in full-time employment (72 %). Of all participants, 217 (40 %) were born outside the UK. A sexually transmitted infection (STI) was reported to have been diagnosed in the previous 12 months in 330/515 (64 %) and 473/544 (87 %) participants reported ever having being diagnosed with an STI. At enrolment, 47/280 (17 %) participants were diagnosed with an STI. Participants reported a median (IQR) of 10 (5–20) partners in the last 90 days, a median (IQR) of 2 (1–5) were condomless sex acts where the participant was receptive and 2 (1–6) were condomless where the participant was insertive. Post-exposure prophylaxis had been prescribed to 184 (34 %) participants in the past 12 months. The number of STI diagnoses was high compared to those reported in GUMCAD attendees. CONCLUSIONS: The PROUD study population are at substantially higher risk of acquiring HIV infection sexually than the overall population of GMSM attending sexual health clinics in England. These findings contribute to explaining the extraordinary HIV incidence rate during follow-up and demonstrate that, despite broad eligibility criteria, the population interested in PrEP was highly selective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled TrialsISRCTN94465371. Date of registration: 28 February 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4806447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48064472016-03-24 An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis Dolling, David I. Desai, Monica McOwan, Alan Gilson, Richard Clarke, Amanda Fisher, Martin Schembri, Gabriel Sullivan, Ann K. Mackie, Nicola Reeves, Iain Portman, Mags Saunders, John Fox, Julie Bayley, Jake Brady, Michael Bowman, Christine Lacey, Charles J. Taylor, Stephen White, David Antonucci, Simone Gafos, Mitzy McCormack, Sheena Gill, Owen N. Dunn, David T. Nardone, Anthony Trials Research BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven biological efficacy to reduce the sexual acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The PROUD study found that PrEP conferred higher protection than in placebo-controlled trials, reducing HIV incidence by 86 % in a population with seven-fold higher HIV incidence than expected. We present the baseline characteristics of the PROUD study population and place the findings in the context of national sexual health clinic data. METHODS: The PROUD study was designed to explore the real-world effectiveness of PrEP (tenofovir-emtricitabine) by randomising HIV-negative gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) to receive open-label PrEP immediately or after a deferral period of 12 months. At enrolment, participants self-completed two baseline questionnaires collecting information on demographics, sexual behaviour and lifestyle in the last 30 and 90 days. These data were compared to data from HIV-negative GMSM attending sexual health clinics in 2013, collated by Public Health England using the genitourinary medicine clinic activity database (GUMCAD). RESULTS: The median age of participants was 35 (IQR: 29–43). Typically participants were white (81 %), educated at a university level (61 %) and in full-time employment (72 %). Of all participants, 217 (40 %) were born outside the UK. A sexually transmitted infection (STI) was reported to have been diagnosed in the previous 12 months in 330/515 (64 %) and 473/544 (87 %) participants reported ever having being diagnosed with an STI. At enrolment, 47/280 (17 %) participants were diagnosed with an STI. Participants reported a median (IQR) of 10 (5–20) partners in the last 90 days, a median (IQR) of 2 (1–5) were condomless sex acts where the participant was receptive and 2 (1–6) were condomless where the participant was insertive. Post-exposure prophylaxis had been prescribed to 184 (34 %) participants in the past 12 months. The number of STI diagnoses was high compared to those reported in GUMCAD attendees. CONCLUSIONS: The PROUD study population are at substantially higher risk of acquiring HIV infection sexually than the overall population of GMSM attending sexual health clinics in England. These findings contribute to explaining the extraordinary HIV incidence rate during follow-up and demonstrate that, despite broad eligibility criteria, the population interested in PrEP was highly selective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled TrialsISRCTN94465371. Date of registration: 28 February 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4806447/ /pubmed/27013513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4 Text en © Dolling et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dolling, David I. Desai, Monica McOwan, Alan Gilson, Richard Clarke, Amanda Fisher, Martin Schembri, Gabriel Sullivan, Ann K. Mackie, Nicola Reeves, Iain Portman, Mags Saunders, John Fox, Julie Bayley, Jake Brady, Michael Bowman, Christine Lacey, Charles J. Taylor, Stephen White, David Antonucci, Simone Gafos, Mitzy McCormack, Sheena Gill, Owen N. Dunn, David T. Nardone, Anthony An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis |
title | An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis |
title_full | An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis |
title_fullStr | An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis |
title_short | An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis |
title_sort | analysis of baseline data from the proud study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dollingdavidi ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT desaimonica ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT mcowanalan ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT gilsonrichard ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT clarkeamanda ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT fishermartin ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT schembrigabriel ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT sullivanannk ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT mackienicola ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT reevesiain ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT portmanmags ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT saundersjohn ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT foxjulie ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT bayleyjake ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT bradymichael ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT bowmanchristine ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT laceycharlesj ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT taylorstephen ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT whitedavid ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT antonuccisimone ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT gafosmitzy ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT mccormacksheena ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT gillowenn ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT dunndavidt ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT nardoneanthony ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT dollingdavidi analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT desaimonica analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT mcowanalan analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT gilsonrichard analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT clarkeamanda analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT fishermartin analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT schembrigabriel analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT sullivanannk analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT mackienicola analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT reevesiain analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT portmanmags analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT saundersjohn analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT foxjulie analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT bayleyjake analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT bradymichael analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT bowmanchristine analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT laceycharlesj analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT taylorstephen analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT whitedavid analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT antonuccisimone analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT gafosmitzy analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT mccormacksheena analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT gillowenn analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT dunndavidt analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT nardoneanthony analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis AT analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis |