Cargando…

An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven biological efficacy to reduce the sexual acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The PROUD study found that PrEP conferred higher protection than in placebo-controlled trials, reducing HIV incidence by 86 % in a population with se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dolling, David I., Desai, Monica, McOwan, Alan, Gilson, Richard, Clarke, Amanda, Fisher, Martin, Schembri, Gabriel, Sullivan, Ann K., Mackie, Nicola, Reeves, Iain, Portman, Mags, Saunders, John, Fox, Julie, Bayley, Jake, Brady, Michael, Bowman, Christine, Lacey, Charles J., Taylor, Stephen, White, David, Antonucci, Simone, Gafos, Mitzy, McCormack, Sheena, Gill, Owen N., Dunn, David T., Nardone, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4
_version_ 1782423238464241664
author Dolling, David I.
Desai, Monica
McOwan, Alan
Gilson, Richard
Clarke, Amanda
Fisher, Martin
Schembri, Gabriel
Sullivan, Ann K.
Mackie, Nicola
Reeves, Iain
Portman, Mags
Saunders, John
Fox, Julie
Bayley, Jake
Brady, Michael
Bowman, Christine
Lacey, Charles J.
Taylor, Stephen
White, David
Antonucci, Simone
Gafos, Mitzy
McCormack, Sheena
Gill, Owen N.
Dunn, David T.
Nardone, Anthony
author_facet Dolling, David I.
Desai, Monica
McOwan, Alan
Gilson, Richard
Clarke, Amanda
Fisher, Martin
Schembri, Gabriel
Sullivan, Ann K.
Mackie, Nicola
Reeves, Iain
Portman, Mags
Saunders, John
Fox, Julie
Bayley, Jake
Brady, Michael
Bowman, Christine
Lacey, Charles J.
Taylor, Stephen
White, David
Antonucci, Simone
Gafos, Mitzy
McCormack, Sheena
Gill, Owen N.
Dunn, David T.
Nardone, Anthony
author_sort Dolling, David I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven biological efficacy to reduce the sexual acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The PROUD study found that PrEP conferred higher protection than in placebo-controlled trials, reducing HIV incidence by 86 % in a population with seven-fold higher HIV incidence than expected. We present the baseline characteristics of the PROUD study population and place the findings in the context of national sexual health clinic data. METHODS: The PROUD study was designed to explore the real-world effectiveness of PrEP (tenofovir-emtricitabine) by randomising HIV-negative gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) to receive open-label PrEP immediately or after a deferral period of 12 months. At enrolment, participants self-completed two baseline questionnaires collecting information on demographics, sexual behaviour and lifestyle in the last 30 and 90 days. These data were compared to data from HIV-negative GMSM attending sexual health clinics in 2013, collated by Public Health England using the genitourinary medicine clinic activity database (GUMCAD). RESULTS: The median age of participants was 35 (IQR: 29–43). Typically participants were white (81 %), educated at a university level (61 %) and in full-time employment (72 %). Of all participants, 217 (40 %) were born outside the UK. A sexually transmitted infection (STI) was reported to have been diagnosed in the previous 12 months in 330/515 (64 %) and 473/544 (87 %) participants reported ever having being diagnosed with an STI. At enrolment, 47/280 (17 %) participants were diagnosed with an STI. Participants reported a median (IQR) of 10 (5–20) partners in the last 90 days, a median (IQR) of 2 (1–5) were condomless sex acts where the participant was receptive and 2 (1–6) were condomless where the participant was insertive. Post-exposure prophylaxis had been prescribed to 184 (34 %) participants in the past 12 months. The number of STI diagnoses was high compared to those reported in GUMCAD attendees. CONCLUSIONS: The PROUD study population are at substantially higher risk of acquiring HIV infection sexually than the overall population of GMSM attending sexual health clinics in England. These findings contribute to explaining the extraordinary HIV incidence rate during follow-up and demonstrate that, despite broad eligibility criteria, the population interested in PrEP was highly selective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled TrialsISRCTN94465371. Date of registration: 28 February 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4806447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48064472016-03-24 An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis Dolling, David I. Desai, Monica McOwan, Alan Gilson, Richard Clarke, Amanda Fisher, Martin Schembri, Gabriel Sullivan, Ann K. Mackie, Nicola Reeves, Iain Portman, Mags Saunders, John Fox, Julie Bayley, Jake Brady, Michael Bowman, Christine Lacey, Charles J. Taylor, Stephen White, David Antonucci, Simone Gafos, Mitzy McCormack, Sheena Gill, Owen N. Dunn, David T. Nardone, Anthony Trials Research BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven biological efficacy to reduce the sexual acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The PROUD study found that PrEP conferred higher protection than in placebo-controlled trials, reducing HIV incidence by 86 % in a population with seven-fold higher HIV incidence than expected. We present the baseline characteristics of the PROUD study population and place the findings in the context of national sexual health clinic data. METHODS: The PROUD study was designed to explore the real-world effectiveness of PrEP (tenofovir-emtricitabine) by randomising HIV-negative gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) to receive open-label PrEP immediately or after a deferral period of 12 months. At enrolment, participants self-completed two baseline questionnaires collecting information on demographics, sexual behaviour and lifestyle in the last 30 and 90 days. These data were compared to data from HIV-negative GMSM attending sexual health clinics in 2013, collated by Public Health England using the genitourinary medicine clinic activity database (GUMCAD). RESULTS: The median age of participants was 35 (IQR: 29–43). Typically participants were white (81 %), educated at a university level (61 %) and in full-time employment (72 %). Of all participants, 217 (40 %) were born outside the UK. A sexually transmitted infection (STI) was reported to have been diagnosed in the previous 12 months in 330/515 (64 %) and 473/544 (87 %) participants reported ever having being diagnosed with an STI. At enrolment, 47/280 (17 %) participants were diagnosed with an STI. Participants reported a median (IQR) of 10 (5–20) partners in the last 90 days, a median (IQR) of 2 (1–5) were condomless sex acts where the participant was receptive and 2 (1–6) were condomless where the participant was insertive. Post-exposure prophylaxis had been prescribed to 184 (34 %) participants in the past 12 months. The number of STI diagnoses was high compared to those reported in GUMCAD attendees. CONCLUSIONS: The PROUD study population are at substantially higher risk of acquiring HIV infection sexually than the overall population of GMSM attending sexual health clinics in England. These findings contribute to explaining the extraordinary HIV incidence rate during follow-up and demonstrate that, despite broad eligibility criteria, the population interested in PrEP was highly selective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled TrialsISRCTN94465371. Date of registration: 28 February 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4806447/ /pubmed/27013513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4 Text en © Dolling et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dolling, David I.
Desai, Monica
McOwan, Alan
Gilson, Richard
Clarke, Amanda
Fisher, Martin
Schembri, Gabriel
Sullivan, Ann K.
Mackie, Nicola
Reeves, Iain
Portman, Mags
Saunders, John
Fox, Julie
Bayley, Jake
Brady, Michael
Bowman, Christine
Lacey, Charles J.
Taylor, Stephen
White, David
Antonucci, Simone
Gafos, Mitzy
McCormack, Sheena
Gill, Owen N.
Dunn, David T.
Nardone, Anthony
An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis
title An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis
title_full An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis
title_fullStr An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis
title_short An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis
title_sort analysis of baseline data from the proud study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27013513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dollingdavidi ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT desaimonica ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT mcowanalan ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT gilsonrichard ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT clarkeamanda ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT fishermartin ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT schembrigabriel ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT sullivanannk ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT mackienicola ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT reevesiain ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT portmanmags ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT saundersjohn ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT foxjulie ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT bayleyjake ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT bradymichael ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT bowmanchristine ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT laceycharlesj ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT taylorstephen ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT whitedavid ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT antonuccisimone ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT gafosmitzy ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT mccormacksheena ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT gillowenn ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT dunndavidt ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT nardoneanthony ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT ananalysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT dollingdavidi analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT desaimonica analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT mcowanalan analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT gilsonrichard analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT clarkeamanda analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT fishermartin analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT schembrigabriel analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT sullivanannk analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT mackienicola analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT reevesiain analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT portmanmags analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT saundersjohn analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT foxjulie analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT bayleyjake analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT bradymichael analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT bowmanchristine analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT laceycharlesj analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT taylorstephen analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT whitedavid analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT antonuccisimone analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT gafosmitzy analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT mccormacksheena analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT gillowenn analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT dunndavidt analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT nardoneanthony analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis
AT analysisofbaselinedatafromtheproudstudyanopenlabelrandomisedtrialofpreexposureprophylaxis