Cargando…

Systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners

BACKGROUND: The health of doctors who work in primary care is threatened by workforce and workload issues. There is a need to find and appraise ways in which to protect their mental health, including how to achieve the broader, positive outcome of well-being. Our primary outcome was to evaluate syst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murray, Marylou, Murray, Lois, Donnelly, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27009060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0431-1
_version_ 1782423250435833856
author Murray, Marylou
Murray, Lois
Donnelly, Michael
author_facet Murray, Marylou
Murray, Lois
Donnelly, Michael
author_sort Murray, Marylou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The health of doctors who work in primary care is threatened by workforce and workload issues. There is a need to find and appraise ways in which to protect their mental health, including how to achieve the broader, positive outcome of well-being. Our primary outcome was to evaluate systematically the research evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve General Practitioner (GP) well-being across two continua; psychopathology (mental ill-health focus) and ‘languishing to flourishing’ (positive mental health focus). In addition we explored the extent to which developments in well-being research may be integrated within existing approaches to design an intervention that will promote mental health and prevent mental illness among these doctors. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cinahl, PsychINFO, Cochrane Register of Trials and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2015 for studies where General Practitioners and synonyms were the primary participants. Eligible interventions included mental ill-health prevention strategies (e.g. promotion of early help-seeking) and mental health promotion programmes (e.g. targeting the development of protective factors at individual and organizational levels). A control group was the minimum design requirement for study inclusion and primary outcomes had to be assessed by validated measures of well-being or mental ill-health. Titles and abstracts were assessed independently by two reviewers with 99 % agreement and full papers were appraised critically using validated tools. RESULTS: Only four studies (with a total of 997 GPs) from 5392 titles met inclusion criteria. The studies reported statistically significant improvement in self-reported mental ill-health. Two interventions used cognitive-behavioural techniques, one was mindfulness-based and one fed-back GHQ scores and self-help information. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for high quality, controlled studies in GP well-being. Research on improving GP well-being is limited by focusing mainly on stressors and not giving systematic attention to the development of positive mental health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0431-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4806499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48064992016-03-25 Systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners Murray, Marylou Murray, Lois Donnelly, Michael BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The health of doctors who work in primary care is threatened by workforce and workload issues. There is a need to find and appraise ways in which to protect their mental health, including how to achieve the broader, positive outcome of well-being. Our primary outcome was to evaluate systematically the research evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve General Practitioner (GP) well-being across two continua; psychopathology (mental ill-health focus) and ‘languishing to flourishing’ (positive mental health focus). In addition we explored the extent to which developments in well-being research may be integrated within existing approaches to design an intervention that will promote mental health and prevent mental illness among these doctors. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cinahl, PsychINFO, Cochrane Register of Trials and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2015 for studies where General Practitioners and synonyms were the primary participants. Eligible interventions included mental ill-health prevention strategies (e.g. promotion of early help-seeking) and mental health promotion programmes (e.g. targeting the development of protective factors at individual and organizational levels). A control group was the minimum design requirement for study inclusion and primary outcomes had to be assessed by validated measures of well-being or mental ill-health. Titles and abstracts were assessed independently by two reviewers with 99 % agreement and full papers were appraised critically using validated tools. RESULTS: Only four studies (with a total of 997 GPs) from 5392 titles met inclusion criteria. The studies reported statistically significant improvement in self-reported mental ill-health. Two interventions used cognitive-behavioural techniques, one was mindfulness-based and one fed-back GHQ scores and self-help information. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for high quality, controlled studies in GP well-being. Research on improving GP well-being is limited by focusing mainly on stressors and not giving systematic attention to the development of positive mental health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0431-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4806499/ /pubmed/27009060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0431-1 Text en © Murray et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murray, Marylou
Murray, Lois
Donnelly, Michael
Systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
title Systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
title_full Systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
title_fullStr Systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
title_short Systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
title_sort systematic review of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27009060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0431-1
work_keys_str_mv AT murraymarylou systematicreviewofinterventionstoimprovethepsychologicalwellbeingofgeneralpractitioners
AT murraylois systematicreviewofinterventionstoimprovethepsychologicalwellbeingofgeneralpractitioners
AT donnellymichael systematicreviewofinterventionstoimprovethepsychologicalwellbeingofgeneralpractitioners