Cargando…
Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) plastic (ABS) models generated using a low-cost 3D fused deposition modelling printer. MATERIAL/METHODS: Two human dry mandibles were scanned with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Accuitomo device. Pr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27003456 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895656 |
_version_ | 1782423258203684864 |
---|---|
author | Maschio, Federico Pandya, Mirali Olszewski, Raphael |
author_facet | Maschio, Federico Pandya, Mirali Olszewski, Raphael |
author_sort | Maschio, Federico |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) plastic (ABS) models generated using a low-cost 3D fused deposition modelling printer. MATERIAL/METHODS: Two human dry mandibles were scanned with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Accuitomo device. Preprocessing consisted of 3D reconstruction with Maxilim software and STL file repair with Netfabb software. Then, the data were used to print 2 plastic replicas with a low-cost 3D fused deposition modeling printer (Up plus 2(®)). Two independent observers performed the identification of 26 anatomic landmarks on the 4 mandibles (2 dry and 2 replicas) with a 3D measuring arm. Each observer repeated the identifications 20 times. The comparison between the dry and plastic mandibles was based on 13 distances: 8 distances less than 12 mm and 5 distances greater than 12 mm. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference (MAD) was 0.37 mm, and the mean dimensional error (MDE) was 3.76%. The MDE decreased to 0.93% for distances greater than 12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic models generated using the low-cost 3D printer UPplus2(®) provide dimensional accuracies comparable to other well-established rapid prototyping technologies. Validated low-cost 3D printers could represent a step toward the better accessibility of rapid prototyping technologies in the medical field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4806585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48065852016-04-07 Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer Maschio, Federico Pandya, Mirali Olszewski, Raphael Med Sci Monit Medical Technology BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) plastic (ABS) models generated using a low-cost 3D fused deposition modelling printer. MATERIAL/METHODS: Two human dry mandibles were scanned with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Accuitomo device. Preprocessing consisted of 3D reconstruction with Maxilim software and STL file repair with Netfabb software. Then, the data were used to print 2 plastic replicas with a low-cost 3D fused deposition modeling printer (Up plus 2(®)). Two independent observers performed the identification of 26 anatomic landmarks on the 4 mandibles (2 dry and 2 replicas) with a 3D measuring arm. Each observer repeated the identifications 20 times. The comparison between the dry and plastic mandibles was based on 13 distances: 8 distances less than 12 mm and 5 distances greater than 12 mm. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference (MAD) was 0.37 mm, and the mean dimensional error (MDE) was 3.76%. The MDE decreased to 0.93% for distances greater than 12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic models generated using the low-cost 3D printer UPplus2(®) provide dimensional accuracies comparable to other well-established rapid prototyping technologies. Validated low-cost 3D printers could represent a step toward the better accessibility of rapid prototyping technologies in the medical field. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4806585/ /pubmed/27003456 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895656 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License |
spellingShingle | Medical Technology Maschio, Federico Pandya, Mirali Olszewski, Raphael Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer |
title | Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer |
title_full | Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer |
title_fullStr | Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer |
title_short | Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer |
title_sort | experimental validation of plastic mandible models produced by a “low-cost” 3-dimensional fused deposition modeling printer |
topic | Medical Technology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27003456 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maschiofederico experimentalvalidationofplasticmandiblemodelsproducedbyalowcost3dimensionalfuseddepositionmodelingprinter AT pandyamirali experimentalvalidationofplasticmandiblemodelsproducedbyalowcost3dimensionalfuseddepositionmodelingprinter AT olszewskiraphael experimentalvalidationofplasticmandiblemodelsproducedbyalowcost3dimensionalfuseddepositionmodelingprinter |