Cargando…

Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) plastic (ABS) models generated using a low-cost 3D fused deposition modelling printer. MATERIAL/METHODS: Two human dry mandibles were scanned with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Accuitomo device. Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maschio, Federico, Pandya, Mirali, Olszewski, Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27003456
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895656
_version_ 1782423258203684864
author Maschio, Federico
Pandya, Mirali
Olszewski, Raphael
author_facet Maschio, Federico
Pandya, Mirali
Olszewski, Raphael
author_sort Maschio, Federico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) plastic (ABS) models generated using a low-cost 3D fused deposition modelling printer. MATERIAL/METHODS: Two human dry mandibles were scanned with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Accuitomo device. Preprocessing consisted of 3D reconstruction with Maxilim software and STL file repair with Netfabb software. Then, the data were used to print 2 plastic replicas with a low-cost 3D fused deposition modeling printer (Up plus 2(®)). Two independent observers performed the identification of 26 anatomic landmarks on the 4 mandibles (2 dry and 2 replicas) with a 3D measuring arm. Each observer repeated the identifications 20 times. The comparison between the dry and plastic mandibles was based on 13 distances: 8 distances less than 12 mm and 5 distances greater than 12 mm. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference (MAD) was 0.37 mm, and the mean dimensional error (MDE) was 3.76%. The MDE decreased to 0.93% for distances greater than 12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic models generated using the low-cost 3D printer UPplus2(®) provide dimensional accuracies comparable to other well-established rapid prototyping technologies. Validated low-cost 3D printers could represent a step toward the better accessibility of rapid prototyping technologies in the medical field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4806585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48065852016-04-07 Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer Maschio, Federico Pandya, Mirali Olszewski, Raphael Med Sci Monit Medical Technology BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) plastic (ABS) models generated using a low-cost 3D fused deposition modelling printer. MATERIAL/METHODS: Two human dry mandibles were scanned with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Accuitomo device. Preprocessing consisted of 3D reconstruction with Maxilim software and STL file repair with Netfabb software. Then, the data were used to print 2 plastic replicas with a low-cost 3D fused deposition modeling printer (Up plus 2(®)). Two independent observers performed the identification of 26 anatomic landmarks on the 4 mandibles (2 dry and 2 replicas) with a 3D measuring arm. Each observer repeated the identifications 20 times. The comparison between the dry and plastic mandibles was based on 13 distances: 8 distances less than 12 mm and 5 distances greater than 12 mm. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference (MAD) was 0.37 mm, and the mean dimensional error (MDE) was 3.76%. The MDE decreased to 0.93% for distances greater than 12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic models generated using the low-cost 3D printer UPplus2(®) provide dimensional accuracies comparable to other well-established rapid prototyping technologies. Validated low-cost 3D printers could represent a step toward the better accessibility of rapid prototyping technologies in the medical field. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4806585/ /pubmed/27003456 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895656 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Medical Technology
Maschio, Federico
Pandya, Mirali
Olszewski, Raphael
Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer
title Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer
title_full Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer
title_fullStr Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer
title_short Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a “Low-Cost” 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer
title_sort experimental validation of plastic mandible models produced by a “low-cost” 3-dimensional fused deposition modeling printer
topic Medical Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27003456
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895656
work_keys_str_mv AT maschiofederico experimentalvalidationofplasticmandiblemodelsproducedbyalowcost3dimensionalfuseddepositionmodelingprinter
AT pandyamirali experimentalvalidationofplasticmandiblemodelsproducedbyalowcost3dimensionalfuseddepositionmodelingprinter
AT olszewskiraphael experimentalvalidationofplasticmandiblemodelsproducedbyalowcost3dimensionalfuseddepositionmodelingprinter