Cargando…

“Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld

Major advances in chronic heart failure (cHF) therapy have been achieved and documented in adult patients, while research regarding the mechanisms and therapy of cHF in children has lagged behind. Based on receptor physiological studies and pharmacological knowledge, treatment with specific ß1-adren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schranz, Dietmar, Voelkel, Norbert F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26895877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2700-3
_version_ 1782423278406598656
author Schranz, Dietmar
Voelkel, Norbert F.
author_facet Schranz, Dietmar
Voelkel, Norbert F.
author_sort Schranz, Dietmar
collection PubMed
description Major advances in chronic heart failure (cHF) therapy have been achieved and documented in adult patients, while research regarding the mechanisms and therapy of cHF in children has lagged behind. Based on receptor physiological studies and pharmacological knowledge, treatment with specific ß1-adrenergic receptor blocker (ARB), tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), and mineralocorticoid antagonists have to be recommended in children despite lack of sufficient data derived from prospective randomized studies. At our institution, bisoprolol, lisinopril, and spironolactone have been firmly established to treat systolic cHF, hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) following hybrid approach and congenital left-right shunt diseases, latest in patients where surgery has to be delayed. Chronic therapy with long-acting diuretics and fluid restriction are not advocated because short-term effects are achieved at the expense of further neuro-humoral stimulation. It remains unclear why diuretics are recommended although evidence-based studies, documenting long-term benefit, are missing. However, that is true for all currently used drugs for pediatric cHF. Conclusion: This review focuses on the prevailing “nihilism” of cHF therapy in children with the goal to encourage physicians to treat pediatric cHF with a rationally designed therapy, which combines available agents that have been shown to improve survival in adult patients with cHF. Because of the lack of clinical trials, which generate the needed evidence, surrogate variables like heart and respiratory rate, weight gain, image-derived data, and biomarkers should be monitored and used instead. The recommended pharmacological therapy for systolic heart failure is also provided as the basis for utilizing reversible pulmonary arterial banding (PAB) as a novel strategy in young children with dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM) with preserved right ventricular function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00431-016-2700-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4806719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48067192016-04-09 “Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld Schranz, Dietmar Voelkel, Norbert F. Eur J Pediatr Review Major advances in chronic heart failure (cHF) therapy have been achieved and documented in adult patients, while research regarding the mechanisms and therapy of cHF in children has lagged behind. Based on receptor physiological studies and pharmacological knowledge, treatment with specific ß1-adrenergic receptor blocker (ARB), tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), and mineralocorticoid antagonists have to be recommended in children despite lack of sufficient data derived from prospective randomized studies. At our institution, bisoprolol, lisinopril, and spironolactone have been firmly established to treat systolic cHF, hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) following hybrid approach and congenital left-right shunt diseases, latest in patients where surgery has to be delayed. Chronic therapy with long-acting diuretics and fluid restriction are not advocated because short-term effects are achieved at the expense of further neuro-humoral stimulation. It remains unclear why diuretics are recommended although evidence-based studies, documenting long-term benefit, are missing. However, that is true for all currently used drugs for pediatric cHF. Conclusion: This review focuses on the prevailing “nihilism” of cHF therapy in children with the goal to encourage physicians to treat pediatric cHF with a rationally designed therapy, which combines available agents that have been shown to improve survival in adult patients with cHF. Because of the lack of clinical trials, which generate the needed evidence, surrogate variables like heart and respiratory rate, weight gain, image-derived data, and biomarkers should be monitored and used instead. The recommended pharmacological therapy for systolic heart failure is also provided as the basis for utilizing reversible pulmonary arterial banding (PAB) as a novel strategy in young children with dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM) with preserved right ventricular function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00431-016-2700-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-02-19 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4806719/ /pubmed/26895877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2700-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Schranz, Dietmar
Voelkel, Norbert F.
“Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld
title “Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld
title_full “Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld
title_fullStr “Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld
title_full_unstemmed “Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld
title_short “Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld
title_sort “nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4806719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26895877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2700-3
work_keys_str_mv AT schranzdietmar nihilismofchronicheartfailuretherapyinchildrenandwhyeffectivetherapyiswithheld
AT voelkelnorbertf nihilismofchronicheartfailuretherapyinchildrenandwhyeffectivetherapyiswithheld