Cargando…

A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue

Variability in human taste perception is associated with both genetic and environmental factors. The influence of taste receptor expression on this variability is unknown, in part, due to the difficulty in obtaining human oral tissue that enables quantitative expression measures of taste genes. In a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Archer, Nicholas Steven, Liu, Dongli, Shaw, Jan, Hannan, Garry, Duesing, Konsta, Keast, Russell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4807031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27010324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152157
_version_ 1782423329623244800
author Archer, Nicholas Steven
Liu, Dongli
Shaw, Jan
Hannan, Garry
Duesing, Konsta
Keast, Russell
author_facet Archer, Nicholas Steven
Liu, Dongli
Shaw, Jan
Hannan, Garry
Duesing, Konsta
Keast, Russell
author_sort Archer, Nicholas Steven
collection PubMed
description Variability in human taste perception is associated with both genetic and environmental factors. The influence of taste receptor expression on this variability is unknown, in part, due to the difficulty in obtaining human oral tissue that enables quantitative expression measures of taste genes. In a comparison of six current techniques (Oragene RNeasy Kit, Isohelix swab, Livibrush cytobrush, tongue saliva, cheek saliva collection, and fungiform papillae biopsy), we identify the fungiform papillae biopsy is the optimal sampling technique to analyse human taste gene expression. The fungiform papillae biopsy resulted in the highest RNA integrity, enabling amplification of all the assessed taste receptor genes (TAS1R1, TAS1R2, TAS1R3, SCNN1A and CD36) and taste tissue marker genes (NCAM1, GNAT3 and PLCβ2). Furthermore, quantitative expression was observed in a subset of taste genes assessed from the saliva collection techniques (cheek saliva, tongue saliva and Oragene RNA kit). These saliva collection techniques may be useful as a non-invasive alternative sampling technique to the fungiform papillae biopsy. Identification of the fungiform papillae biopsy as the optimal collection method will facilitate further research into understanding the effect of gene expression on variability in human taste perception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4807031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48070312016-03-25 A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue Archer, Nicholas Steven Liu, Dongli Shaw, Jan Hannan, Garry Duesing, Konsta Keast, Russell PLoS One Research Article Variability in human taste perception is associated with both genetic and environmental factors. The influence of taste receptor expression on this variability is unknown, in part, due to the difficulty in obtaining human oral tissue that enables quantitative expression measures of taste genes. In a comparison of six current techniques (Oragene RNeasy Kit, Isohelix swab, Livibrush cytobrush, tongue saliva, cheek saliva collection, and fungiform papillae biopsy), we identify the fungiform papillae biopsy is the optimal sampling technique to analyse human taste gene expression. The fungiform papillae biopsy resulted in the highest RNA integrity, enabling amplification of all the assessed taste receptor genes (TAS1R1, TAS1R2, TAS1R3, SCNN1A and CD36) and taste tissue marker genes (NCAM1, GNAT3 and PLCβ2). Furthermore, quantitative expression was observed in a subset of taste genes assessed from the saliva collection techniques (cheek saliva, tongue saliva and Oragene RNA kit). These saliva collection techniques may be useful as a non-invasive alternative sampling technique to the fungiform papillae biopsy. Identification of the fungiform papillae biopsy as the optimal collection method will facilitate further research into understanding the effect of gene expression on variability in human taste perception. Public Library of Science 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4807031/ /pubmed/27010324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152157 Text en © 2016 Archer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Archer, Nicholas Steven
Liu, Dongli
Shaw, Jan
Hannan, Garry
Duesing, Konsta
Keast, Russell
A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue
title A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue
title_full A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue
title_fullStr A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue
title_short A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue
title_sort comparison of collection techniques for gene expression analysis of human oral taste tissue
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4807031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27010324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152157
work_keys_str_mv AT archernicholassteven acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT liudongli acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT shawjan acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT hannangarry acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT duesingkonsta acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT keastrussell acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT archernicholassteven comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT liudongli comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT shawjan comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT hannangarry comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT duesingkonsta comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue
AT keastrussell comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue