Cargando…
A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue
Variability in human taste perception is associated with both genetic and environmental factors. The influence of taste receptor expression on this variability is unknown, in part, due to the difficulty in obtaining human oral tissue that enables quantitative expression measures of taste genes. In a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4807031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27010324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152157 |
_version_ | 1782423329623244800 |
---|---|
author | Archer, Nicholas Steven Liu, Dongli Shaw, Jan Hannan, Garry Duesing, Konsta Keast, Russell |
author_facet | Archer, Nicholas Steven Liu, Dongli Shaw, Jan Hannan, Garry Duesing, Konsta Keast, Russell |
author_sort | Archer, Nicholas Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | Variability in human taste perception is associated with both genetic and environmental factors. The influence of taste receptor expression on this variability is unknown, in part, due to the difficulty in obtaining human oral tissue that enables quantitative expression measures of taste genes. In a comparison of six current techniques (Oragene RNeasy Kit, Isohelix swab, Livibrush cytobrush, tongue saliva, cheek saliva collection, and fungiform papillae biopsy), we identify the fungiform papillae biopsy is the optimal sampling technique to analyse human taste gene expression. The fungiform papillae biopsy resulted in the highest RNA integrity, enabling amplification of all the assessed taste receptor genes (TAS1R1, TAS1R2, TAS1R3, SCNN1A and CD36) and taste tissue marker genes (NCAM1, GNAT3 and PLCβ2). Furthermore, quantitative expression was observed in a subset of taste genes assessed from the saliva collection techniques (cheek saliva, tongue saliva and Oragene RNA kit). These saliva collection techniques may be useful as a non-invasive alternative sampling technique to the fungiform papillae biopsy. Identification of the fungiform papillae biopsy as the optimal collection method will facilitate further research into understanding the effect of gene expression on variability in human taste perception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4807031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48070312016-03-25 A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue Archer, Nicholas Steven Liu, Dongli Shaw, Jan Hannan, Garry Duesing, Konsta Keast, Russell PLoS One Research Article Variability in human taste perception is associated with both genetic and environmental factors. The influence of taste receptor expression on this variability is unknown, in part, due to the difficulty in obtaining human oral tissue that enables quantitative expression measures of taste genes. In a comparison of six current techniques (Oragene RNeasy Kit, Isohelix swab, Livibrush cytobrush, tongue saliva, cheek saliva collection, and fungiform papillae biopsy), we identify the fungiform papillae biopsy is the optimal sampling technique to analyse human taste gene expression. The fungiform papillae biopsy resulted in the highest RNA integrity, enabling amplification of all the assessed taste receptor genes (TAS1R1, TAS1R2, TAS1R3, SCNN1A and CD36) and taste tissue marker genes (NCAM1, GNAT3 and PLCβ2). Furthermore, quantitative expression was observed in a subset of taste genes assessed from the saliva collection techniques (cheek saliva, tongue saliva and Oragene RNA kit). These saliva collection techniques may be useful as a non-invasive alternative sampling technique to the fungiform papillae biopsy. Identification of the fungiform papillae biopsy as the optimal collection method will facilitate further research into understanding the effect of gene expression on variability in human taste perception. Public Library of Science 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4807031/ /pubmed/27010324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152157 Text en © 2016 Archer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Archer, Nicholas Steven Liu, Dongli Shaw, Jan Hannan, Garry Duesing, Konsta Keast, Russell A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue |
title | A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue |
title_full | A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue |
title_short | A Comparison of Collection Techniques for Gene Expression Analysis of Human Oral Taste Tissue |
title_sort | comparison of collection techniques for gene expression analysis of human oral taste tissue |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4807031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27010324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT archernicholassteven acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT liudongli acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT shawjan acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT hannangarry acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT duesingkonsta acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT keastrussell acomparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT archernicholassteven comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT liudongli comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT shawjan comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT hannangarry comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT duesingkonsta comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue AT keastrussell comparisonofcollectiontechniquesforgeneexpressionanalysisofhumanoraltastetissue |