Cargando…

Compositional Analysis of Biomass Reference Materials: Results from an Interlaboratory Study

Biomass compositional methods are used to compare different lignocellulosic feedstocks, to measure component balances around unit operations and to determine process yields and therefore the economic viability of biomass-to-biofuel processes. Four biomass reference materials (RMs NIST 8491–8494) wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Templeton, David W., Wolfrum, Edward J., Yen, James H., Sharpless, Katherine E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4807399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9675-1
_version_ 1782423378433409024
author Templeton, David W.
Wolfrum, Edward J.
Yen, James H.
Sharpless, Katherine E.
author_facet Templeton, David W.
Wolfrum, Edward J.
Yen, James H.
Sharpless, Katherine E.
author_sort Templeton, David W.
collection PubMed
description Biomass compositional methods are used to compare different lignocellulosic feedstocks, to measure component balances around unit operations and to determine process yields and therefore the economic viability of biomass-to-biofuel processes. Four biomass reference materials (RMs NIST 8491–8494) were prepared and characterized, via an interlaboratory comparison exercise in the early 1990s to evaluate biomass summative compositional methods, analysts, and laboratories. Having common, uniform, and stable biomass reference materials gives the opportunity to assess compositional data compared to other analysts, to other labs, and to a known compositional value. The expiration date for the original characterization of these RMs was reached and an effort to assess their stability and recharacterize the reference values for the remaining material using more current methods of analysis was initiated. We sent samples of the four biomass RMs to 11 academic, industrial, and government laboratories, familiar with sulfuric acid compositional methods, for recharacterization of the component reference values. In this work, we have used an expanded suite of analytical methods that are more appropriate for herbaceous feedstocks, to recharacterize the RMs’ compositions. We report the median values and the expanded uncertainty values for the four RMs on a dry-mass, whole-biomass basis. The original characterization data has been recalculated using median statistics to facilitate comparisons with this data. We found improved total component closures for three out of the four RMs compared to the original characterization, and the total component closures were near 100 %, which suggests that most components were accurately measured and little double counting occurred. The major components were not statistically different in the recharacterization which suggests that the biomass materials are stable during storage and that additional components, not seen in the original characterization, were quantified here.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4807399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48073992016-03-25 Compositional Analysis of Biomass Reference Materials: Results from an Interlaboratory Study Templeton, David W. Wolfrum, Edward J. Yen, James H. Sharpless, Katherine E. Bioenergy Res Article Biomass compositional methods are used to compare different lignocellulosic feedstocks, to measure component balances around unit operations and to determine process yields and therefore the economic viability of biomass-to-biofuel processes. Four biomass reference materials (RMs NIST 8491–8494) were prepared and characterized, via an interlaboratory comparison exercise in the early 1990s to evaluate biomass summative compositional methods, analysts, and laboratories. Having common, uniform, and stable biomass reference materials gives the opportunity to assess compositional data compared to other analysts, to other labs, and to a known compositional value. The expiration date for the original characterization of these RMs was reached and an effort to assess their stability and recharacterize the reference values for the remaining material using more current methods of analysis was initiated. We sent samples of the four biomass RMs to 11 academic, industrial, and government laboratories, familiar with sulfuric acid compositional methods, for recharacterization of the component reference values. In this work, we have used an expanded suite of analytical methods that are more appropriate for herbaceous feedstocks, to recharacterize the RMs’ compositions. We report the median values and the expanded uncertainty values for the four RMs on a dry-mass, whole-biomass basis. The original characterization data has been recalculated using median statistics to facilitate comparisons with this data. We found improved total component closures for three out of the four RMs compared to the original characterization, and the total component closures were near 100 %, which suggests that most components were accurately measured and little double counting occurred. The major components were not statistically different in the recharacterization which suggests that the biomass materials are stable during storage and that additional components, not seen in the original characterization, were quantified here. 2015-10-29 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4807399/ /pubmed/27019676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9675-1 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Templeton, David W.
Wolfrum, Edward J.
Yen, James H.
Sharpless, Katherine E.
Compositional Analysis of Biomass Reference Materials: Results from an Interlaboratory Study
title Compositional Analysis of Biomass Reference Materials: Results from an Interlaboratory Study
title_full Compositional Analysis of Biomass Reference Materials: Results from an Interlaboratory Study
title_fullStr Compositional Analysis of Biomass Reference Materials: Results from an Interlaboratory Study
title_full_unstemmed Compositional Analysis of Biomass Reference Materials: Results from an Interlaboratory Study
title_short Compositional Analysis of Biomass Reference Materials: Results from an Interlaboratory Study
title_sort compositional analysis of biomass reference materials: results from an interlaboratory study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4807399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9675-1
work_keys_str_mv AT templetondavidw compositionalanalysisofbiomassreferencematerialsresultsfromaninterlaboratorystudy
AT wolfrumedwardj compositionalanalysisofbiomassreferencematerialsresultsfromaninterlaboratorystudy
AT yenjamesh compositionalanalysisofbiomassreferencematerialsresultsfromaninterlaboratorystudy
AT sharplesskatherinee compositionalanalysisofbiomassreferencematerialsresultsfromaninterlaboratorystudy