Cargando…

Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents

BACKGROUND: Moisture control is very important in restorative procedures in dentistry. Use of hemostatic agents helps control moisture; however, they might result in changes on enamel and dentin surfaces, affecting composite resin bond quality. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoroushi, Maryam, Shirban, Farinaz, Sahraneshin-Samani, Mahsa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4808314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27034759
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52782
_version_ 1782423482771963904
author Khoroushi, Maryam
Shirban, Farinaz
Sahraneshin-Samani, Mahsa
author_facet Khoroushi, Maryam
Shirban, Farinaz
Sahraneshin-Samani, Mahsa
author_sort Khoroushi, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Moisture control is very important in restorative procedures in dentistry. Use of hemostatic agents helps control moisture; however, they might result in changes on enamel and dentin surfaces, affecting composite resin bond quality. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal microleakage of two different composite resins with the use of three different hemostatic agents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 48 premolars with cervical margins 1 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The samples were randomly divided into 8 groups. In groups 1 to 4, an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond) was applied as the bonding system, followed by exposure to different hemostatic agent: group 1: no hemostatic agent (control); group 2: ViscoStat; group 3: ViscoStat Clear; and group 4: trichloracetic acid, as hemostatic agents. The cavities were restored with Z-250 composite resin. In group 5 to 8 Silorane System Adhesive (Filtek P90 Adhesive) was applied as a bonding agent, followed by exposure to different hemostatic agents in a manner similar to that in groups 1to 4. The cavities were restored with Filtek P90, a low-shrinkage composite resin. The samples in each group were evaluated for dye penetration under a stereomicroscope at ×36 after 24 hours and a 500-round thermocycling procedure at enamel and dentin margins. Statistical analysis was carried out using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: Z-250 composite resin exhibited significantly higher dentin microleakage scores compared to Filtek P90 (P = 0.004). Trichloracetic acid increased dentin microleakage with Filtek P90 (P=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Under the limitations of this in vitro study, application of hemostatic agents did not affect microleakage of the two tested composite resins except for trichloracetic acid that increased marginal microleakage when used with Filtek P90. Key words:Composite resin, dental leakage, hemostatics, silorane system adhesive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4808314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48083142016-04-01 Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents Khoroushi, Maryam Shirban, Farinaz Sahraneshin-Samani, Mahsa J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Moisture control is very important in restorative procedures in dentistry. Use of hemostatic agents helps control moisture; however, they might result in changes on enamel and dentin surfaces, affecting composite resin bond quality. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal microleakage of two different composite resins with the use of three different hemostatic agents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 48 premolars with cervical margins 1 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The samples were randomly divided into 8 groups. In groups 1 to 4, an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond) was applied as the bonding system, followed by exposure to different hemostatic agent: group 1: no hemostatic agent (control); group 2: ViscoStat; group 3: ViscoStat Clear; and group 4: trichloracetic acid, as hemostatic agents. The cavities were restored with Z-250 composite resin. In group 5 to 8 Silorane System Adhesive (Filtek P90 Adhesive) was applied as a bonding agent, followed by exposure to different hemostatic agents in a manner similar to that in groups 1to 4. The cavities were restored with Filtek P90, a low-shrinkage composite resin. The samples in each group were evaluated for dye penetration under a stereomicroscope at ×36 after 24 hours and a 500-round thermocycling procedure at enamel and dentin margins. Statistical analysis was carried out using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: Z-250 composite resin exhibited significantly higher dentin microleakage scores compared to Filtek P90 (P = 0.004). Trichloracetic acid increased dentin microleakage with Filtek P90 (P=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Under the limitations of this in vitro study, application of hemostatic agents did not affect microleakage of the two tested composite resins except for trichloracetic acid that increased marginal microleakage when used with Filtek P90. Key words:Composite resin, dental leakage, hemostatics, silorane system adhesive. Medicina Oral S.L. 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4808314/ /pubmed/27034759 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52782 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Khoroushi, Maryam
Shirban, Farinaz
Sahraneshin-Samani, Mahsa
Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents
title Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents
title_full Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents
title_fullStr Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents
title_full_unstemmed Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents
title_short Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents
title_sort marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: effect of three different hemostatic agents
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4808314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27034759
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52782
work_keys_str_mv AT khoroushimaryam marginalintegrityoflowshrinkageandmethacrylatebasedcompositeresinseffectofthreedifferenthemostaticagents
AT shirbanfarinaz marginalintegrityoflowshrinkageandmethacrylatebasedcompositeresinseffectofthreedifferenthemostaticagents
AT sahraneshinsamanimahsa marginalintegrityoflowshrinkageandmethacrylatebasedcompositeresinseffectofthreedifferenthemostaticagents