Cargando…

Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis

Identifying sets of metastable conformations is a major research topic in RNA energy landscape analysis, and recently several methods have been proposed for finding local minima in landscapes spawned by RNA secondary structures. An important and time-critical component of such methods is steepest, o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Day, Luke, Abdelhadi Ep Souki, Ouala, Albrecht, Andreas A., Steinhöfel, Kathleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4808746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9654921
_version_ 1782423519966003200
author Day, Luke
Abdelhadi Ep Souki, Ouala
Albrecht, Andreas A.
Steinhöfel, Kathleen
author_facet Day, Luke
Abdelhadi Ep Souki, Ouala
Albrecht, Andreas A.
Steinhöfel, Kathleen
author_sort Day, Luke
collection PubMed
description Identifying sets of metastable conformations is a major research topic in RNA energy landscape analysis, and recently several methods have been proposed for finding local minima in landscapes spawned by RNA secondary structures. An important and time-critical component of such methods is steepest, or gradient, descent in attraction basins of local minima. We analyse the speed-up achievable by randomised descent in attraction basins in the context of large sample sets where the size has an order of magnitude in the region of ~10(6). While the gain for each individual sample might be marginal, the overall run-time improvement can be significant. Moreover, for the two nongradient methods we analysed for partial energy landscapes induced by ten different RNA sequences, we obtained that the number of observed local minima is on average larger by 7.3% and 3.5%, respectively. The run-time improvement is approximately 16.6% and 6.8% on average over the ten partial energy landscapes. For the large sample size we selected for descent procedures, the coverage of local minima is very high up to energy values of the region where the samples were randomly selected from the partial energy landscapes; that is, the difference to the total set of local minima is mainly due to the upper area of the energy landscapes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4808746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48087462016-04-24 Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis Day, Luke Abdelhadi Ep Souki, Ouala Albrecht, Andreas A. Steinhöfel, Kathleen Adv Bioinformatics Research Article Identifying sets of metastable conformations is a major research topic in RNA energy landscape analysis, and recently several methods have been proposed for finding local minima in landscapes spawned by RNA secondary structures. An important and time-critical component of such methods is steepest, or gradient, descent in attraction basins of local minima. We analyse the speed-up achievable by randomised descent in attraction basins in the context of large sample sets where the size has an order of magnitude in the region of ~10(6). While the gain for each individual sample might be marginal, the overall run-time improvement can be significant. Moreover, for the two nongradient methods we analysed for partial energy landscapes induced by ten different RNA sequences, we obtained that the number of observed local minima is on average larger by 7.3% and 3.5%, respectively. The run-time improvement is approximately 16.6% and 6.8% on average over the ten partial energy landscapes. For the large sample size we selected for descent procedures, the coverage of local minima is very high up to energy values of the region where the samples were randomly selected from the partial energy landscapes; that is, the difference to the total set of local minima is mainly due to the upper area of the energy landscapes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4808746/ /pubmed/27110241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9654921 Text en Copyright © 2016 Luke Day et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Day, Luke
Abdelhadi Ep Souki, Ouala
Albrecht, Andreas A.
Steinhöfel, Kathleen
Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis
title Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis
title_full Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis
title_fullStr Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis
title_short Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis
title_sort random versus deterministic descent in rna energy landscape analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4808746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9654921
work_keys_str_mv AT dayluke randomversusdeterministicdescentinrnaenergylandscapeanalysis
AT abdelhadiepsoukiouala randomversusdeterministicdescentinrnaenergylandscapeanalysis
AT albrechtandreasa randomversusdeterministicdescentinrnaenergylandscapeanalysis
AT steinhofelkathleen randomversusdeterministicdescentinrnaenergylandscapeanalysis