Cargando…
Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis
Identifying sets of metastable conformations is a major research topic in RNA energy landscape analysis, and recently several methods have been proposed for finding local minima in landscapes spawned by RNA secondary structures. An important and time-critical component of such methods is steepest, o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4808746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9654921 |
_version_ | 1782423519966003200 |
---|---|
author | Day, Luke Abdelhadi Ep Souki, Ouala Albrecht, Andreas A. Steinhöfel, Kathleen |
author_facet | Day, Luke Abdelhadi Ep Souki, Ouala Albrecht, Andreas A. Steinhöfel, Kathleen |
author_sort | Day, Luke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identifying sets of metastable conformations is a major research topic in RNA energy landscape analysis, and recently several methods have been proposed for finding local minima in landscapes spawned by RNA secondary structures. An important and time-critical component of such methods is steepest, or gradient, descent in attraction basins of local minima. We analyse the speed-up achievable by randomised descent in attraction basins in the context of large sample sets where the size has an order of magnitude in the region of ~10(6). While the gain for each individual sample might be marginal, the overall run-time improvement can be significant. Moreover, for the two nongradient methods we analysed for partial energy landscapes induced by ten different RNA sequences, we obtained that the number of observed local minima is on average larger by 7.3% and 3.5%, respectively. The run-time improvement is approximately 16.6% and 6.8% on average over the ten partial energy landscapes. For the large sample size we selected for descent procedures, the coverage of local minima is very high up to energy values of the region where the samples were randomly selected from the partial energy landscapes; that is, the difference to the total set of local minima is mainly due to the upper area of the energy landscapes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4808746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48087462016-04-24 Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis Day, Luke Abdelhadi Ep Souki, Ouala Albrecht, Andreas A. Steinhöfel, Kathleen Adv Bioinformatics Research Article Identifying sets of metastable conformations is a major research topic in RNA energy landscape analysis, and recently several methods have been proposed for finding local minima in landscapes spawned by RNA secondary structures. An important and time-critical component of such methods is steepest, or gradient, descent in attraction basins of local minima. We analyse the speed-up achievable by randomised descent in attraction basins in the context of large sample sets where the size has an order of magnitude in the region of ~10(6). While the gain for each individual sample might be marginal, the overall run-time improvement can be significant. Moreover, for the two nongradient methods we analysed for partial energy landscapes induced by ten different RNA sequences, we obtained that the number of observed local minima is on average larger by 7.3% and 3.5%, respectively. The run-time improvement is approximately 16.6% and 6.8% on average over the ten partial energy landscapes. For the large sample size we selected for descent procedures, the coverage of local minima is very high up to energy values of the region where the samples were randomly selected from the partial energy landscapes; that is, the difference to the total set of local minima is mainly due to the upper area of the energy landscapes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4808746/ /pubmed/27110241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9654921 Text en Copyright © 2016 Luke Day et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Day, Luke Abdelhadi Ep Souki, Ouala Albrecht, Andreas A. Steinhöfel, Kathleen Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis |
title | Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis |
title_full | Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis |
title_fullStr | Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis |
title_short | Random versus Deterministic Descent in RNA Energy Landscape Analysis |
title_sort | random versus deterministic descent in rna energy landscape analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4808746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9654921 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dayluke randomversusdeterministicdescentinrnaenergylandscapeanalysis AT abdelhadiepsoukiouala randomversusdeterministicdescentinrnaenergylandscapeanalysis AT albrechtandreasa randomversusdeterministicdescentinrnaenergylandscapeanalysis AT steinhofelkathleen randomversusdeterministicdescentinrnaenergylandscapeanalysis |