Cargando…
Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial
INTRODUCTION: Answering the demands of an increasingly young and active patient population, recent developments in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have shifted towards minimising tissue damage. The Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem was developed to preserve the trochanteric region of the femur, whic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27009147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010472 |
_version_ | 1782423583739346944 |
---|---|
author | van Beers, Loes W A H van Oldenrijk, Jakob Scholtes, Vanessa A B Geerdink, Carel H Niers, Bob B A M Runne, Wouter Bhandari, Mohit Poolman, Rudolf W |
author_facet | van Beers, Loes W A H van Oldenrijk, Jakob Scholtes, Vanessa A B Geerdink, Carel H Niers, Bob B A M Runne, Wouter Bhandari, Mohit Poolman, Rudolf W |
author_sort | van Beers, Loes W A H |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Answering the demands of an increasingly young and active patient population, recent developments in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have shifted towards minimising tissue damage. The Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem was developed to preserve the trochanteric region of the femur, which potentially preserves the insertion of the gluteus musculature. This might accelerate early postoperative rehabilitation and improve functional outcome. Currently the functional results of the CFP stem have not been compared with conventional straight stems in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). The primary purpose of this trial is to compare the functional result of CFP stem THA with conventional uncemented straight stem THA, measured by the Dutch Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 3-month follow-up. METHODS: A prospective blinded multicentre RCT will be performed. We aim to recruit 150 patients. The patients will be randomly allocated to a THA with a straight or a curved stem. All patients, research assistants, clinical assessors and investigators will be blinded for the type of prosthesis for 5 years. Clinical assessments and roentgenograms will be taken preoperative, at 6 weeks after surgery, at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after surgery. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) will be obtained at the same follow-up moments. In addition, the PROMs will also be sent to the patients at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The HOOS at 3-month follow-up will be our primary outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. A local ethics committee has approved this trial. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participating patients. All serious adverse events will be reported to the ethics committee. RESULTS: Results will be submitted for publication to an orthopaedics related journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR1560. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4809092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48090922016-04-01 Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial van Beers, Loes W A H van Oldenrijk, Jakob Scholtes, Vanessa A B Geerdink, Carel H Niers, Bob B A M Runne, Wouter Bhandari, Mohit Poolman, Rudolf W BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Answering the demands of an increasingly young and active patient population, recent developments in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have shifted towards minimising tissue damage. The Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem was developed to preserve the trochanteric region of the femur, which potentially preserves the insertion of the gluteus musculature. This might accelerate early postoperative rehabilitation and improve functional outcome. Currently the functional results of the CFP stem have not been compared with conventional straight stems in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). The primary purpose of this trial is to compare the functional result of CFP stem THA with conventional uncemented straight stem THA, measured by the Dutch Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 3-month follow-up. METHODS: A prospective blinded multicentre RCT will be performed. We aim to recruit 150 patients. The patients will be randomly allocated to a THA with a straight or a curved stem. All patients, research assistants, clinical assessors and investigators will be blinded for the type of prosthesis for 5 years. Clinical assessments and roentgenograms will be taken preoperative, at 6 weeks after surgery, at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after surgery. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) will be obtained at the same follow-up moments. In addition, the PROMs will also be sent to the patients at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The HOOS at 3-month follow-up will be our primary outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. A local ethics committee has approved this trial. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participating patients. All serious adverse events will be reported to the ethics committee. RESULTS: Results will be submitted for publication to an orthopaedics related journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR1560. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4809092/ /pubmed/27009147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010472 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Surgery van Beers, Loes W A H van Oldenrijk, Jakob Scholtes, Vanessa A B Geerdink, Carel H Niers, Bob B A M Runne, Wouter Bhandari, Mohit Poolman, Rudolf W Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial |
title | Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial |
title_full | Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial |
title_fullStr | Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial |
title_short | Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial |
title_sort | curved versus straight stem uncemented total hip arthroplasty osteoarthritis multicenter trial (custom): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27009147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanbeersloeswah curvedversusstraightstemuncementedtotalhiparthroplastyosteoarthritismulticentertrialcustomdesignofaprospectiveblindedrandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrial AT vanoldenrijkjakob curvedversusstraightstemuncementedtotalhiparthroplastyosteoarthritismulticentertrialcustomdesignofaprospectiveblindedrandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrial AT scholtesvanessaab curvedversusstraightstemuncementedtotalhiparthroplastyosteoarthritismulticentertrialcustomdesignofaprospectiveblindedrandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrial AT geerdinkcarelh curvedversusstraightstemuncementedtotalhiparthroplastyosteoarthritismulticentertrialcustomdesignofaprospectiveblindedrandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrial AT niersbobbam curvedversusstraightstemuncementedtotalhiparthroplastyosteoarthritismulticentertrialcustomdesignofaprospectiveblindedrandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrial AT runnewouter curvedversusstraightstemuncementedtotalhiparthroplastyosteoarthritismulticentertrialcustomdesignofaprospectiveblindedrandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrial AT bhandarimohit curvedversusstraightstemuncementedtotalhiparthroplastyosteoarthritismulticentertrialcustomdesignofaprospectiveblindedrandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrial AT poolmanrudolfw curvedversusstraightstemuncementedtotalhiparthroplastyosteoarthritismulticentertrialcustomdesignofaprospectiveblindedrandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrial |