Cargando…
Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology
INTRODUCTION: Telemicrobiology is a growing component of clinical microbiology informatics. However, few studies have been performed to assess the diagnostic utility of telemicroscopy systems in evaluating infectious agents. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate multiple contemporary digital pathology platforms for u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27076988 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.177687 |
_version_ | 1782423588993761280 |
---|---|
author | Rhoads, Daniel D. Habib-Bein, Nadia F. Hariri, Rahman S. Hartman, Douglas J. Monaco, Sara E. Lesniak, Andrew Duboy, Jon Salama, Mohamed El-Sayed Pantanowitz, Liron |
author_facet | Rhoads, Daniel D. Habib-Bein, Nadia F. Hariri, Rahman S. Hartman, Douglas J. Monaco, Sara E. Lesniak, Andrew Duboy, Jon Salama, Mohamed El-Sayed Pantanowitz, Liron |
author_sort | Rhoads, Daniel D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Telemicrobiology is a growing component of clinical microbiology informatics. However, few studies have been performed to assess the diagnostic utility of telemicroscopy systems in evaluating infectious agents. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate multiple contemporary digital pathology platforms for use in diagnostic telemicrobiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mix of thirty cases that included viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitological findings were evaluated by four experts using ×40 whole slide imaging (WSI) scans, ×83 oil-immersion WSI scans, ×100 oil-immersion WSI scans, digital photomicrographs, and glass slides. RESULTS: The ×83 WSI, ×100 WSI, and photomicrograph interpretations were not significantly different in quality and accuracy when compared to glass slide interpretations. The ×40 WSI interpretations were of lower quality and were more likely to be incorrect when compared to glass slide interpretations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, high magnification, oil-immersion digital pathology platforms are better suited to support telemicrobiology applications and yield interpretations on par with glass slide evaluations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4809116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48091162016-04-13 Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology Rhoads, Daniel D. Habib-Bein, Nadia F. Hariri, Rahman S. Hartman, Douglas J. Monaco, Sara E. Lesniak, Andrew Duboy, Jon Salama, Mohamed El-Sayed Pantanowitz, Liron J Pathol Inform Original Article INTRODUCTION: Telemicrobiology is a growing component of clinical microbiology informatics. However, few studies have been performed to assess the diagnostic utility of telemicroscopy systems in evaluating infectious agents. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate multiple contemporary digital pathology platforms for use in diagnostic telemicrobiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mix of thirty cases that included viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitological findings were evaluated by four experts using ×40 whole slide imaging (WSI) scans, ×83 oil-immersion WSI scans, ×100 oil-immersion WSI scans, digital photomicrographs, and glass slides. RESULTS: The ×83 WSI, ×100 WSI, and photomicrograph interpretations were not significantly different in quality and accuracy when compared to glass slide interpretations. The ×40 WSI interpretations were of lower quality and were more likely to be incorrect when compared to glass slide interpretations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, high magnification, oil-immersion digital pathology platforms are better suited to support telemicrobiology applications and yield interpretations on par with glass slide evaluations. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4809116/ /pubmed/27076988 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.177687 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rhoads, Daniel D. Habib-Bein, Nadia F. Hariri, Rahman S. Hartman, Douglas J. Monaco, Sara E. Lesniak, Andrew Duboy, Jon Salama, Mohamed El-Sayed Pantanowitz, Liron Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology |
title | Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology |
title_full | Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology |
title_short | Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology |
title_sort | comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27076988 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.177687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rhoadsdanield comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology AT habibbeinnadiaf comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology AT haririrahmans comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology AT hartmandouglasj comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology AT monacosarae comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology AT lesniakandrew comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology AT duboyjon comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology AT salamamohamedelsayed comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology AT pantanowitzliron comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology |