Cargando…

Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology

INTRODUCTION: Telemicrobiology is a growing component of clinical microbiology informatics. However, few studies have been performed to assess the diagnostic utility of telemicroscopy systems in evaluating infectious agents. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate multiple contemporary digital pathology platforms for u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhoads, Daniel D., Habib-Bein, Nadia F., Hariri, Rahman S., Hartman, Douglas J., Monaco, Sara E., Lesniak, Andrew, Duboy, Jon, Salama, Mohamed El-Sayed, Pantanowitz, Liron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27076988
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.177687
_version_ 1782423588993761280
author Rhoads, Daniel D.
Habib-Bein, Nadia F.
Hariri, Rahman S.
Hartman, Douglas J.
Monaco, Sara E.
Lesniak, Andrew
Duboy, Jon
Salama, Mohamed El-Sayed
Pantanowitz, Liron
author_facet Rhoads, Daniel D.
Habib-Bein, Nadia F.
Hariri, Rahman S.
Hartman, Douglas J.
Monaco, Sara E.
Lesniak, Andrew
Duboy, Jon
Salama, Mohamed El-Sayed
Pantanowitz, Liron
author_sort Rhoads, Daniel D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Telemicrobiology is a growing component of clinical microbiology informatics. However, few studies have been performed to assess the diagnostic utility of telemicroscopy systems in evaluating infectious agents. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate multiple contemporary digital pathology platforms for use in diagnostic telemicrobiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mix of thirty cases that included viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitological findings were evaluated by four experts using ×40 whole slide imaging (WSI) scans, ×83 oil-immersion WSI scans, ×100 oil-immersion WSI scans, digital photomicrographs, and glass slides. RESULTS: The ×83 WSI, ×100 WSI, and photomicrograph interpretations were not significantly different in quality and accuracy when compared to glass slide interpretations. The ×40 WSI interpretations were of lower quality and were more likely to be incorrect when compared to glass slide interpretations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, high magnification, oil-immersion digital pathology platforms are better suited to support telemicrobiology applications and yield interpretations on par with glass slide evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4809116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48091162016-04-13 Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology Rhoads, Daniel D. Habib-Bein, Nadia F. Hariri, Rahman S. Hartman, Douglas J. Monaco, Sara E. Lesniak, Andrew Duboy, Jon Salama, Mohamed El-Sayed Pantanowitz, Liron J Pathol Inform Original Article INTRODUCTION: Telemicrobiology is a growing component of clinical microbiology informatics. However, few studies have been performed to assess the diagnostic utility of telemicroscopy systems in evaluating infectious agents. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate multiple contemporary digital pathology platforms for use in diagnostic telemicrobiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mix of thirty cases that included viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitological findings were evaluated by four experts using ×40 whole slide imaging (WSI) scans, ×83 oil-immersion WSI scans, ×100 oil-immersion WSI scans, digital photomicrographs, and glass slides. RESULTS: The ×83 WSI, ×100 WSI, and photomicrograph interpretations were not significantly different in quality and accuracy when compared to glass slide interpretations. The ×40 WSI interpretations were of lower quality and were more likely to be incorrect when compared to glass slide interpretations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, high magnification, oil-immersion digital pathology platforms are better suited to support telemicrobiology applications and yield interpretations on par with glass slide evaluations. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4809116/ /pubmed/27076988 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.177687 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rhoads, Daniel D.
Habib-Bein, Nadia F.
Hariri, Rahman S.
Hartman, Douglas J.
Monaco, Sara E.
Lesniak, Andrew
Duboy, Jon
Salama, Mohamed El-Sayed
Pantanowitz, Liron
Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology
title Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology
title_full Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology
title_fullStr Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology
title_short Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology
title_sort comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27076988
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.177687
work_keys_str_mv AT rhoadsdanield comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology
AT habibbeinnadiaf comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology
AT haririrahmans comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology
AT hartmandouglasj comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology
AT monacosarae comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology
AT lesniakandrew comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology
AT duboyjon comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology
AT salamamohamedelsayed comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology
AT pantanowitzliron comparisonofthediagnosticutilityofdigitalpathologysystemsfortelemicrobiology