Cargando…
Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler)
INTRODUCTION: Correct inhaler technique and device preference are positively correlated with improved adherence and clinical outcomes. This study was designed to investigate inhaler technique mastery and device preference for three different dry powder inhalers, Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000119 |
_version_ | 1782423593536192512 |
---|---|
author | Sandler, Niklas Holländer, Jenny Långström, Disa Santtila, Pekka Saukkonen, Anni Torvinen, Saku |
author_facet | Sandler, Niklas Holländer, Jenny Långström, Disa Santtila, Pekka Saukkonen, Anni Torvinen, Saku |
author_sort | Sandler, Niklas |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Correct inhaler technique and device preference are positively correlated with improved adherence and clinical outcomes. This study was designed to investigate inhaler technique mastery and device preference for three different dry powder inhalers, Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. METHODS: This was a single site, single visit, crossover study assessing device mastery, handling errors and preference using empty Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices in healthy adult Finnish volunteers. Inhaler naïve adult participants were observed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) to evaluate the proportion of participants achieving device mastery (defined as an absence of HCP observed errors) using a three-step approach: (1) intuitive use (with no instructions), (2) after reading the patient information leaflet and (3) after HCP instruction. HCPs monitored and recorded errors based on device-specific handling error checklists. At the end of the study, participants completed a device preference questionnaire and rated their satisfaction with the three devices. RESULTS: Spiromax was correctly used by 37.5% and 93.3% of participants in steps 1 and 2, respectively, compared with 0% and 58.3% with Easyhaler, and 9.2% and 76.7% with Turbuhaler. All three devices showed high mastery (>95%) in step 3. The most common error reported with Spiromax was related to the orientation of the device. Not shaking the device was the most common error with Easyhaler. Errors in priming the device were the most common with Turbuhaler. Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler were rated as the ‘easiest device to use’ by 73.1%, 12.6% and 14.3% of participants, respectively. The HCP instructions clearly improved the use of all devices. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of device mastery, including intuitive/ease of use, were reported by naïve users when using Spiromax compared with Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4809147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48091472016-03-29 Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler) Sandler, Niklas Holländer, Jenny Långström, Disa Santtila, Pekka Saukkonen, Anni Torvinen, Saku BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Research INTRODUCTION: Correct inhaler technique and device preference are positively correlated with improved adherence and clinical outcomes. This study was designed to investigate inhaler technique mastery and device preference for three different dry powder inhalers, Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. METHODS: This was a single site, single visit, crossover study assessing device mastery, handling errors and preference using empty Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices in healthy adult Finnish volunteers. Inhaler naïve adult participants were observed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) to evaluate the proportion of participants achieving device mastery (defined as an absence of HCP observed errors) using a three-step approach: (1) intuitive use (with no instructions), (2) after reading the patient information leaflet and (3) after HCP instruction. HCPs monitored and recorded errors based on device-specific handling error checklists. At the end of the study, participants completed a device preference questionnaire and rated their satisfaction with the three devices. RESULTS: Spiromax was correctly used by 37.5% and 93.3% of participants in steps 1 and 2, respectively, compared with 0% and 58.3% with Easyhaler, and 9.2% and 76.7% with Turbuhaler. All three devices showed high mastery (>95%) in step 3. The most common error reported with Spiromax was related to the orientation of the device. Not shaking the device was the most common error with Easyhaler. Errors in priming the device were the most common with Turbuhaler. Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler were rated as the ‘easiest device to use’ by 73.1%, 12.6% and 14.3% of participants, respectively. The HCP instructions clearly improved the use of all devices. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of device mastery, including intuitive/ease of use, were reported by naïve users when using Spiromax compared with Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4809147/ /pubmed/27026804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000119 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Respiratory Research Sandler, Niklas Holländer, Jenny Långström, Disa Santtila, Pekka Saukkonen, Anni Torvinen, Saku Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler) |
title | Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler) |
title_full | Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler) |
title_short | Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler) |
title_sort | evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with spiromax, easyhaler and turbuhaler devices among healthy finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (finhaler) |
topic | Respiratory Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandlerniklas evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler AT hollanderjenny evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler AT langstromdisa evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler AT santtilapekka evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler AT saukkonenanni evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler AT torvinensaku evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler |