Cargando…

Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler)

INTRODUCTION: Correct inhaler technique and device preference are positively correlated with improved adherence and clinical outcomes. This study was designed to investigate inhaler technique mastery and device preference for three different dry powder inhalers, Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandler, Niklas, Holländer, Jenny, Långström, Disa, Santtila, Pekka, Saukkonen, Anni, Torvinen, Saku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000119
_version_ 1782423593536192512
author Sandler, Niklas
Holländer, Jenny
Långström, Disa
Santtila, Pekka
Saukkonen, Anni
Torvinen, Saku
author_facet Sandler, Niklas
Holländer, Jenny
Långström, Disa
Santtila, Pekka
Saukkonen, Anni
Torvinen, Saku
author_sort Sandler, Niklas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Correct inhaler technique and device preference are positively correlated with improved adherence and clinical outcomes. This study was designed to investigate inhaler technique mastery and device preference for three different dry powder inhalers, Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. METHODS: This was a single site, single visit, crossover study assessing device mastery, handling errors and preference using empty Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices in healthy adult Finnish volunteers. Inhaler naïve adult participants were observed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) to evaluate the proportion of participants achieving device mastery (defined as an absence of HCP observed errors) using a three-step approach: (1) intuitive use (with no instructions), (2) after reading the patient information leaflet and (3) after HCP instruction. HCPs monitored and recorded errors based on device-specific handling error checklists. At the end of the study, participants completed a device preference questionnaire and rated their satisfaction with the three devices. RESULTS: Spiromax was correctly used by 37.5% and 93.3% of participants in steps 1 and 2, respectively, compared with 0% and 58.3% with Easyhaler, and 9.2% and 76.7% with Turbuhaler. All three devices showed high mastery (>95%) in step 3. The most common error reported with Spiromax was related to the orientation of the device. Not shaking the device was the most common error with Easyhaler. Errors in priming the device were the most common with Turbuhaler. Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler were rated as the ‘easiest device to use’ by 73.1%, 12.6% and 14.3% of participants, respectively. The HCP instructions clearly improved the use of all devices. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of device mastery, including intuitive/ease of use, were reported by naïve users when using Spiromax compared with Easyhaler and Turbuhaler.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4809147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48091472016-03-29 Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler) Sandler, Niklas Holländer, Jenny Långström, Disa Santtila, Pekka Saukkonen, Anni Torvinen, Saku BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Research INTRODUCTION: Correct inhaler technique and device preference are positively correlated with improved adherence and clinical outcomes. This study was designed to investigate inhaler technique mastery and device preference for three different dry powder inhalers, Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. METHODS: This was a single site, single visit, crossover study assessing device mastery, handling errors and preference using empty Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices in healthy adult Finnish volunteers. Inhaler naïve adult participants were observed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) to evaluate the proportion of participants achieving device mastery (defined as an absence of HCP observed errors) using a three-step approach: (1) intuitive use (with no instructions), (2) after reading the patient information leaflet and (3) after HCP instruction. HCPs monitored and recorded errors based on device-specific handling error checklists. At the end of the study, participants completed a device preference questionnaire and rated their satisfaction with the three devices. RESULTS: Spiromax was correctly used by 37.5% and 93.3% of participants in steps 1 and 2, respectively, compared with 0% and 58.3% with Easyhaler, and 9.2% and 76.7% with Turbuhaler. All three devices showed high mastery (>95%) in step 3. The most common error reported with Spiromax was related to the orientation of the device. Not shaking the device was the most common error with Easyhaler. Errors in priming the device were the most common with Turbuhaler. Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler were rated as the ‘easiest device to use’ by 73.1%, 12.6% and 14.3% of participants, respectively. The HCP instructions clearly improved the use of all devices. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of device mastery, including intuitive/ease of use, were reported by naïve users when using Spiromax compared with Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4809147/ /pubmed/27026804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000119 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Respiratory Research
Sandler, Niklas
Holländer, Jenny
Långström, Disa
Santtila, Pekka
Saukkonen, Anni
Torvinen, Saku
Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler)
title Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler)
title_full Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler)
title_fullStr Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler)
title_short Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler)
title_sort evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with spiromax, easyhaler and turbuhaler devices among healthy finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (finhaler)
topic Respiratory Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000119
work_keys_str_mv AT sandlerniklas evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler
AT hollanderjenny evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler
AT langstromdisa evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler
AT santtilapekka evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler
AT saukkonenanni evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler
AT torvinensaku evaluationofinhalerhandlingerrorsinhalerperceptionandpreferencewithspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerdevicesamonghealthyfinnishvolunteersasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyfinhaler