Cargando…
Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005
BACKGROUND: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the "New" Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to ill...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japan Epidemiological Association
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18239339 http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.17.S3 |
_version_ | 1782423607601790976 |
---|---|
author | Taniguchi, Kiyosu Hashimoto, Shuji Kawado, Miyuki Murakami, Yoshitaka Izumida, Michiko Ohta, Akiko Tada, Yuki Shigematsu, Mika Yasui, Yoshinori Nagai, Masaki |
author_facet | Taniguchi, Kiyosu Hashimoto, Shuji Kawado, Miyuki Murakami, Yoshitaka Izumida, Michiko Ohta, Akiko Tada, Yuki Shigematsu, Mika Yasui, Yoshinori Nagai, Masaki |
author_sort | Taniguchi, Kiyosu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the "New" Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to illustrate the potential impact of the new surveillance system through a description of the existing surveillance system and data before and after the revision. METHODS: After a historical review of surveillance system in Japan, the current surveillance system is described. Data sets of actual case numbers reported and incidence rate per 1,000,000 population are compared before and after the revision. RESULTS: Comparison of the data between the 2 periods revealed that most of the diseases have had declining trends after the new law was enacted with several exceptions. However, although no major break in continuity is observed in seriously perceived disease, in milder diseases there are striking gaps between the numbers reported in the mandatory and sentinel reporting framework. Sentinel reporting framework maintained the continuity of data without major gaps. CONCLUSIONS: From this perspective, the new surveillance system with two different frameworks of mandatory reporting for severe diseases and sentinel reporting for milder diseases seems to be working well. But continuous efforts should be made for evaluation and improvement of surveillance system and risk communication through the research on data analysis and effective communication method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4809251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Japan Epidemiological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48092512016-03-29 Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005 Taniguchi, Kiyosu Hashimoto, Shuji Kawado, Miyuki Murakami, Yoshitaka Izumida, Michiko Ohta, Akiko Tada, Yuki Shigematsu, Mika Yasui, Yoshinori Nagai, Masaki J Epidemiol Supplement BACKGROUND: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the "New" Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to illustrate the potential impact of the new surveillance system through a description of the existing surveillance system and data before and after the revision. METHODS: After a historical review of surveillance system in Japan, the current surveillance system is described. Data sets of actual case numbers reported and incidence rate per 1,000,000 population are compared before and after the revision. RESULTS: Comparison of the data between the 2 periods revealed that most of the diseases have had declining trends after the new law was enacted with several exceptions. However, although no major break in continuity is observed in seriously perceived disease, in milder diseases there are striking gaps between the numbers reported in the mandatory and sentinel reporting framework. Sentinel reporting framework maintained the continuity of data without major gaps. CONCLUSIONS: From this perspective, the new surveillance system with two different frameworks of mandatory reporting for severe diseases and sentinel reporting for milder diseases seems to be working well. But continuous efforts should be made for evaluation and improvement of surveillance system and risk communication through the research on data analysis and effective communication method. Japan Epidemiological Association 2008-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4809251/ /pubmed/18239339 http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.17.S3 Text en © 2007 Japan Epidemiological Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Supplement Taniguchi, Kiyosu Hashimoto, Shuji Kawado, Miyuki Murakami, Yoshitaka Izumida, Michiko Ohta, Akiko Tada, Yuki Shigematsu, Mika Yasui, Yoshinori Nagai, Masaki Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005 |
title | Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005 |
title_full | Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005 |
title_fullStr | Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005 |
title_full_unstemmed | Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005 |
title_short | Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005 |
title_sort | overview of infectious disease surveillance system in japan, 1999-2005 |
topic | Supplement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18239339 http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.17.S3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taniguchikiyosu overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 AT hashimotoshuji overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 AT kawadomiyuki overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 AT murakamiyoshitaka overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 AT izumidamichiko overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 AT ohtaakiko overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 AT tadayuki overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 AT shigematsumika overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 AT yasuiyoshinori overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 AT nagaimasaki overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005 |