Cargando…

Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005

BACKGROUND: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the "New" Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to ill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taniguchi, Kiyosu, Hashimoto, Shuji, Kawado, Miyuki, Murakami, Yoshitaka, Izumida, Michiko, Ohta, Akiko, Tada, Yuki, Shigematsu, Mika, Yasui, Yoshinori, Nagai, Masaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Epidemiological Association 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18239339
http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.17.S3
_version_ 1782423607601790976
author Taniguchi, Kiyosu
Hashimoto, Shuji
Kawado, Miyuki
Murakami, Yoshitaka
Izumida, Michiko
Ohta, Akiko
Tada, Yuki
Shigematsu, Mika
Yasui, Yoshinori
Nagai, Masaki
author_facet Taniguchi, Kiyosu
Hashimoto, Shuji
Kawado, Miyuki
Murakami, Yoshitaka
Izumida, Michiko
Ohta, Akiko
Tada, Yuki
Shigematsu, Mika
Yasui, Yoshinori
Nagai, Masaki
author_sort Taniguchi, Kiyosu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the "New" Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to illustrate the potential impact of the new surveillance system through a description of the existing surveillance system and data before and after the revision. METHODS: After a historical review of surveillance system in Japan, the current surveillance system is described. Data sets of actual case numbers reported and incidence rate per 1,000,000 population are compared before and after the revision. RESULTS: Comparison of the data between the 2 periods revealed that most of the diseases have had declining trends after the new law was enacted with several exceptions. However, although no major break in continuity is observed in seriously perceived disease, in milder diseases there are striking gaps between the numbers reported in the mandatory and sentinel reporting framework. Sentinel reporting framework maintained the continuity of data without major gaps. CONCLUSIONS: From this perspective, the new surveillance system with two different frameworks of mandatory reporting for severe diseases and sentinel reporting for milder diseases seems to be working well. But continuous efforts should be made for evaluation and improvement of surveillance system and risk communication through the research on data analysis and effective communication method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4809251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Japan Epidemiological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48092512016-03-29 Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005 Taniguchi, Kiyosu Hashimoto, Shuji Kawado, Miyuki Murakami, Yoshitaka Izumida, Michiko Ohta, Akiko Tada, Yuki Shigematsu, Mika Yasui, Yoshinori Nagai, Masaki J Epidemiol Supplement BACKGROUND: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the "New" Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to illustrate the potential impact of the new surveillance system through a description of the existing surveillance system and data before and after the revision. METHODS: After a historical review of surveillance system in Japan, the current surveillance system is described. Data sets of actual case numbers reported and incidence rate per 1,000,000 population are compared before and after the revision. RESULTS: Comparison of the data between the 2 periods revealed that most of the diseases have had declining trends after the new law was enacted with several exceptions. However, although no major break in continuity is observed in seriously perceived disease, in milder diseases there are striking gaps between the numbers reported in the mandatory and sentinel reporting framework. Sentinel reporting framework maintained the continuity of data without major gaps. CONCLUSIONS: From this perspective, the new surveillance system with two different frameworks of mandatory reporting for severe diseases and sentinel reporting for milder diseases seems to be working well. But continuous efforts should be made for evaluation and improvement of surveillance system and risk communication through the research on data analysis and effective communication method. Japan Epidemiological Association 2008-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4809251/ /pubmed/18239339 http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.17.S3 Text en © 2007 Japan Epidemiological Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Supplement
Taniguchi, Kiyosu
Hashimoto, Shuji
Kawado, Miyuki
Murakami, Yoshitaka
Izumida, Michiko
Ohta, Akiko
Tada, Yuki
Shigematsu, Mika
Yasui, Yoshinori
Nagai, Masaki
Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005
title Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005
title_full Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005
title_fullStr Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005
title_full_unstemmed Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005
title_short Overview of Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan, 1999-2005
title_sort overview of infectious disease surveillance system in japan, 1999-2005
topic Supplement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18239339
http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.17.S3
work_keys_str_mv AT taniguchikiyosu overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005
AT hashimotoshuji overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005
AT kawadomiyuki overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005
AT murakamiyoshitaka overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005
AT izumidamichiko overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005
AT ohtaakiko overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005
AT tadayuki overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005
AT shigematsumika overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005
AT yasuiyoshinori overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005
AT nagaimasaki overviewofinfectiousdiseasesurveillancesysteminjapan19992005