Cargando…
Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals?
BACKGROUND: Congenic strains of mice are assumed to differ only at a single gene or region of the genome. These mice have great importance in evaluating the function of genes. However, their utility depends on the maintenance of this true congenic nature. Although, accumulating evidence suggests tha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC481063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15245582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-5-14 |
_version_ | 1782121645873299456 |
---|---|
author | McClelland, Erin E Damjanovich, Kristy Gardner, Kyle Groesbeck, Zack J Ma, Maggie S Nibley, Megan Richardson, Kelly S Wilkinson, Maureen Morrison, Linda C Bernhardt, Paul Potts, Wayne K |
author_facet | McClelland, Erin E Damjanovich, Kristy Gardner, Kyle Groesbeck, Zack J Ma, Maggie S Nibley, Megan Richardson, Kelly S Wilkinson, Maureen Morrison, Linda C Bernhardt, Paul Potts, Wayne K |
author_sort | McClelland, Erin E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Congenic strains of mice are assumed to differ only at a single gene or region of the genome. These mice have great importance in evaluating the function of genes. However, their utility depends on the maintenance of this true congenic nature. Although, accumulating evidence suggests that congenic strains suffer genetic divergence that could compromise interpretation of experimental results, this problem is usually ignored. During coinfection studies with Salmonella typhimurium and Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-congenic mice, we conducted the proper F(2 )controls and discovered significant differences between these F(2 )animals and MHC-genotype-matched P(0 )and F(1 )animals in weight gain and pathogen load. To systematically evaluate the apparent non-MHC differences in these mice, we infected all three generations (P(0), F(1 )and F(2)) for 5 MHC genotypes (b/b, b/q and q/q as well as d/d, d/q, and q/q) with Salmonella and TMEV. RESULTS: Infected P(0 )MHC q/q congenic homozygotes lost significantly more weight (p = 0.02) and had significantly higher Salmonella (p < 0.01) and TMEV (p = 0.02) titers than the infected F(2 )q/q homozygotes. Neither weight nor pathogen load differences were present in sham-infected controls. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that these strains differ for genes other than those in the MHC congenic region. The most likely explanation is that deleterious recessive mutations affecting response to infection have accumulated in the more than 40 years that this B10.Q-H-2(q )MHC-congenic strain has been separated from its B10-H-2(b )parental strain. During typical experiments with congenic strains, the phenotypes of these accumulated mutations will be falsely ascribed to the congenic gene(s). This problem likely affects any strains separated for appreciable time and while usually ignored, can be avoided with the use of F(2 )segregants. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-481063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4810632004-07-23 Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals? McClelland, Erin E Damjanovich, Kristy Gardner, Kyle Groesbeck, Zack J Ma, Maggie S Nibley, Megan Richardson, Kelly S Wilkinson, Maureen Morrison, Linda C Bernhardt, Paul Potts, Wayne K BMC Immunol Research Article BACKGROUND: Congenic strains of mice are assumed to differ only at a single gene or region of the genome. These mice have great importance in evaluating the function of genes. However, their utility depends on the maintenance of this true congenic nature. Although, accumulating evidence suggests that congenic strains suffer genetic divergence that could compromise interpretation of experimental results, this problem is usually ignored. During coinfection studies with Salmonella typhimurium and Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-congenic mice, we conducted the proper F(2 )controls and discovered significant differences between these F(2 )animals and MHC-genotype-matched P(0 )and F(1 )animals in weight gain and pathogen load. To systematically evaluate the apparent non-MHC differences in these mice, we infected all three generations (P(0), F(1 )and F(2)) for 5 MHC genotypes (b/b, b/q and q/q as well as d/d, d/q, and q/q) with Salmonella and TMEV. RESULTS: Infected P(0 )MHC q/q congenic homozygotes lost significantly more weight (p = 0.02) and had significantly higher Salmonella (p < 0.01) and TMEV (p = 0.02) titers than the infected F(2 )q/q homozygotes. Neither weight nor pathogen load differences were present in sham-infected controls. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that these strains differ for genes other than those in the MHC congenic region. The most likely explanation is that deleterious recessive mutations affecting response to infection have accumulated in the more than 40 years that this B10.Q-H-2(q )MHC-congenic strain has been separated from its B10-H-2(b )parental strain. During typical experiments with congenic strains, the phenotypes of these accumulated mutations will be falsely ascribed to the congenic gene(s). This problem likely affects any strains separated for appreciable time and while usually ignored, can be avoided with the use of F(2 )segregants. BioMed Central 2004-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC481063/ /pubmed/15245582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-5-14 Text en Copyright © 2004 McClelland et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McClelland, Erin E Damjanovich, Kristy Gardner, Kyle Groesbeck, Zack J Ma, Maggie S Nibley, Megan Richardson, Kelly S Wilkinson, Maureen Morrison, Linda C Bernhardt, Paul Potts, Wayne K Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals? |
title | Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals? |
title_full | Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals? |
title_fullStr | Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals? |
title_full_unstemmed | Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals? |
title_short | Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals? |
title_sort | infection-dependent phenotypes in mhc-congenic mice are not due to mhc: can we trust congenic animals? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC481063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15245582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-5-14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcclellanderine infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT damjanovichkristy infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT gardnerkyle infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT groesbeckzackj infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT mamaggies infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT nibleymegan infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT richardsonkellys infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT wilkinsonmaureen infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT morrisonlindac infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT bernhardtpaul infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals AT pottswaynek infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals |