Cargando…

Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals?

BACKGROUND: Congenic strains of mice are assumed to differ only at a single gene or region of the genome. These mice have great importance in evaluating the function of genes. However, their utility depends on the maintenance of this true congenic nature. Although, accumulating evidence suggests tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McClelland, Erin E, Damjanovich, Kristy, Gardner, Kyle, Groesbeck, Zack J, Ma, Maggie S, Nibley, Megan, Richardson, Kelly S, Wilkinson, Maureen, Morrison, Linda C, Bernhardt, Paul, Potts, Wayne K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC481063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15245582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-5-14
_version_ 1782121645873299456
author McClelland, Erin E
Damjanovich, Kristy
Gardner, Kyle
Groesbeck, Zack J
Ma, Maggie S
Nibley, Megan
Richardson, Kelly S
Wilkinson, Maureen
Morrison, Linda C
Bernhardt, Paul
Potts, Wayne K
author_facet McClelland, Erin E
Damjanovich, Kristy
Gardner, Kyle
Groesbeck, Zack J
Ma, Maggie S
Nibley, Megan
Richardson, Kelly S
Wilkinson, Maureen
Morrison, Linda C
Bernhardt, Paul
Potts, Wayne K
author_sort McClelland, Erin E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Congenic strains of mice are assumed to differ only at a single gene or region of the genome. These mice have great importance in evaluating the function of genes. However, their utility depends on the maintenance of this true congenic nature. Although, accumulating evidence suggests that congenic strains suffer genetic divergence that could compromise interpretation of experimental results, this problem is usually ignored. During coinfection studies with Salmonella typhimurium and Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-congenic mice, we conducted the proper F(2 )controls and discovered significant differences between these F(2 )animals and MHC-genotype-matched P(0 )and F(1 )animals in weight gain and pathogen load. To systematically evaluate the apparent non-MHC differences in these mice, we infected all three generations (P(0), F(1 )and F(2)) for 5 MHC genotypes (b/b, b/q and q/q as well as d/d, d/q, and q/q) with Salmonella and TMEV. RESULTS: Infected P(0 )MHC q/q congenic homozygotes lost significantly more weight (p = 0.02) and had significantly higher Salmonella (p < 0.01) and TMEV (p = 0.02) titers than the infected F(2 )q/q homozygotes. Neither weight nor pathogen load differences were present in sham-infected controls. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that these strains differ for genes other than those in the MHC congenic region. The most likely explanation is that deleterious recessive mutations affecting response to infection have accumulated in the more than 40 years that this B10.Q-H-2(q )MHC-congenic strain has been separated from its B10-H-2(b )parental strain. During typical experiments with congenic strains, the phenotypes of these accumulated mutations will be falsely ascribed to the congenic gene(s). This problem likely affects any strains separated for appreciable time and while usually ignored, can be avoided with the use of F(2 )segregants.
format Text
id pubmed-481063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-4810632004-07-23 Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals? McClelland, Erin E Damjanovich, Kristy Gardner, Kyle Groesbeck, Zack J Ma, Maggie S Nibley, Megan Richardson, Kelly S Wilkinson, Maureen Morrison, Linda C Bernhardt, Paul Potts, Wayne K BMC Immunol Research Article BACKGROUND: Congenic strains of mice are assumed to differ only at a single gene or region of the genome. These mice have great importance in evaluating the function of genes. However, their utility depends on the maintenance of this true congenic nature. Although, accumulating evidence suggests that congenic strains suffer genetic divergence that could compromise interpretation of experimental results, this problem is usually ignored. During coinfection studies with Salmonella typhimurium and Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-congenic mice, we conducted the proper F(2 )controls and discovered significant differences between these F(2 )animals and MHC-genotype-matched P(0 )and F(1 )animals in weight gain and pathogen load. To systematically evaluate the apparent non-MHC differences in these mice, we infected all three generations (P(0), F(1 )and F(2)) for 5 MHC genotypes (b/b, b/q and q/q as well as d/d, d/q, and q/q) with Salmonella and TMEV. RESULTS: Infected P(0 )MHC q/q congenic homozygotes lost significantly more weight (p = 0.02) and had significantly higher Salmonella (p < 0.01) and TMEV (p = 0.02) titers than the infected F(2 )q/q homozygotes. Neither weight nor pathogen load differences were present in sham-infected controls. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that these strains differ for genes other than those in the MHC congenic region. The most likely explanation is that deleterious recessive mutations affecting response to infection have accumulated in the more than 40 years that this B10.Q-H-2(q )MHC-congenic strain has been separated from its B10-H-2(b )parental strain. During typical experiments with congenic strains, the phenotypes of these accumulated mutations will be falsely ascribed to the congenic gene(s). This problem likely affects any strains separated for appreciable time and while usually ignored, can be avoided with the use of F(2 )segregants. BioMed Central 2004-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC481063/ /pubmed/15245582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-5-14 Text en Copyright © 2004 McClelland et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
McClelland, Erin E
Damjanovich, Kristy
Gardner, Kyle
Groesbeck, Zack J
Ma, Maggie S
Nibley, Megan
Richardson, Kelly S
Wilkinson, Maureen
Morrison, Linda C
Bernhardt, Paul
Potts, Wayne K
Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals?
title Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals?
title_full Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals?
title_fullStr Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals?
title_full_unstemmed Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals?
title_short Infection-dependent phenotypes in MHC-congenic mice are not due to MHC: can we trust congenic animals?
title_sort infection-dependent phenotypes in mhc-congenic mice are not due to mhc: can we trust congenic animals?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC481063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15245582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-5-14
work_keys_str_mv AT mcclellanderine infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT damjanovichkristy infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT gardnerkyle infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT groesbeckzackj infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT mamaggies infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT nibleymegan infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT richardsonkellys infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT wilkinsonmaureen infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT morrisonlindac infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT bernhardtpaul infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals
AT pottswaynek infectiondependentphenotypesinmhccongenicmicearenotduetomhccanwetrustcongenicanimals