Cargando…

WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges

BACKGROUND: Reducing maternal mortality and morbidity are among the key international development goals. A prerequisite for monitoring the progress towards attainment of these goals is accurate assessment of the levels of mortality and morbidity. In order to contribute to mapping the global burden o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gülmezoglu, A Metin, Say, Lale, Betrán, Ana P, Villar, Jose, Piaggio, Gilda
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC481067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15236664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-16
_version_ 1782121649729961984
author Gülmezoglu, A Metin
Say, Lale
Betrán, Ana P
Villar, Jose
Piaggio, Gilda
author_facet Gülmezoglu, A Metin
Say, Lale
Betrán, Ana P
Villar, Jose
Piaggio, Gilda
author_sort Gülmezoglu, A Metin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing maternal mortality and morbidity are among the key international development goals. A prerequisite for monitoring the progress towards attainment of these goals is accurate assessment of the levels of mortality and morbidity. In order to contribute to mapping the global burden of reproductive ill-health, we are conducting a systematic review of incidence and prevalence of maternal mortality and morbidity. METHODS: We followed the standard methodology for systematic reviews. We prepared a protocol and a form for data extraction that identify key characteristics on study and reporting quality. An extensive search was conducted for the years 1997–2002 including electronic and hand searching. RESULTS: We screened the titles and abstracts of about 65,000 citations identified through 11 electronic databases as well as various other sources. Four thousand six hundred and twenty-six full-text reports were critically appraised and 2443 are included in the review so far. Approximately one third of the studies were conducted in Asia and Africa. The reporting quality was generally low with definitions for conditions and the diagnostic methods often not reported. CONCLUSIONS: There are unique challenges and issues regarding the search, critical appraisal and summarizing epidemiological data in this systematic review of prevalence/incidence studies. More methodological studies and discussion to advance the field will be useful. Considerable efforts including leadership, consensus building and resources are required to improve the standards of monitoring burden of disease.
format Text
id pubmed-481067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-4810672004-07-23 WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges Gülmezoglu, A Metin Say, Lale Betrán, Ana P Villar, Jose Piaggio, Gilda BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Reducing maternal mortality and morbidity are among the key international development goals. A prerequisite for monitoring the progress towards attainment of these goals is accurate assessment of the levels of mortality and morbidity. In order to contribute to mapping the global burden of reproductive ill-health, we are conducting a systematic review of incidence and prevalence of maternal mortality and morbidity. METHODS: We followed the standard methodology for systematic reviews. We prepared a protocol and a form for data extraction that identify key characteristics on study and reporting quality. An extensive search was conducted for the years 1997–2002 including electronic and hand searching. RESULTS: We screened the titles and abstracts of about 65,000 citations identified through 11 electronic databases as well as various other sources. Four thousand six hundred and twenty-six full-text reports were critically appraised and 2443 are included in the review so far. Approximately one third of the studies were conducted in Asia and Africa. The reporting quality was generally low with definitions for conditions and the diagnostic methods often not reported. CONCLUSIONS: There are unique challenges and issues regarding the search, critical appraisal and summarizing epidemiological data in this systematic review of prevalence/incidence studies. More methodological studies and discussion to advance the field will be useful. Considerable efforts including leadership, consensus building and resources are required to improve the standards of monitoring burden of disease. BioMed Central 2004-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC481067/ /pubmed/15236664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-16 Text en Copyright © 2004 Gülmezoglu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gülmezoglu, A Metin
Say, Lale
Betrán, Ana P
Villar, Jose
Piaggio, Gilda
WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges
title WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges
title_full WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges
title_fullStr WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges
title_full_unstemmed WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges
title_short WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges
title_sort who systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC481067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15236664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-16
work_keys_str_mv AT gulmezogluametin whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges
AT saylale whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges
AT betrananap whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges
AT villarjose whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges
AT piaggiogilda whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges