Cargando…
WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges
BACKGROUND: Reducing maternal mortality and morbidity are among the key international development goals. A prerequisite for monitoring the progress towards attainment of these goals is accurate assessment of the levels of mortality and morbidity. In order to contribute to mapping the global burden o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC481067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15236664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-16 |
_version_ | 1782121649729961984 |
---|---|
author | Gülmezoglu, A Metin Say, Lale Betrán, Ana P Villar, Jose Piaggio, Gilda |
author_facet | Gülmezoglu, A Metin Say, Lale Betrán, Ana P Villar, Jose Piaggio, Gilda |
author_sort | Gülmezoglu, A Metin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reducing maternal mortality and morbidity are among the key international development goals. A prerequisite for monitoring the progress towards attainment of these goals is accurate assessment of the levels of mortality and morbidity. In order to contribute to mapping the global burden of reproductive ill-health, we are conducting a systematic review of incidence and prevalence of maternal mortality and morbidity. METHODS: We followed the standard methodology for systematic reviews. We prepared a protocol and a form for data extraction that identify key characteristics on study and reporting quality. An extensive search was conducted for the years 1997–2002 including electronic and hand searching. RESULTS: We screened the titles and abstracts of about 65,000 citations identified through 11 electronic databases as well as various other sources. Four thousand six hundred and twenty-six full-text reports were critically appraised and 2443 are included in the review so far. Approximately one third of the studies were conducted in Asia and Africa. The reporting quality was generally low with definitions for conditions and the diagnostic methods often not reported. CONCLUSIONS: There are unique challenges and issues regarding the search, critical appraisal and summarizing epidemiological data in this systematic review of prevalence/incidence studies. More methodological studies and discussion to advance the field will be useful. Considerable efforts including leadership, consensus building and resources are required to improve the standards of monitoring burden of disease. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-481067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4810672004-07-23 WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges Gülmezoglu, A Metin Say, Lale Betrán, Ana P Villar, Jose Piaggio, Gilda BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Reducing maternal mortality and morbidity are among the key international development goals. A prerequisite for monitoring the progress towards attainment of these goals is accurate assessment of the levels of mortality and morbidity. In order to contribute to mapping the global burden of reproductive ill-health, we are conducting a systematic review of incidence and prevalence of maternal mortality and morbidity. METHODS: We followed the standard methodology for systematic reviews. We prepared a protocol and a form for data extraction that identify key characteristics on study and reporting quality. An extensive search was conducted for the years 1997–2002 including electronic and hand searching. RESULTS: We screened the titles and abstracts of about 65,000 citations identified through 11 electronic databases as well as various other sources. Four thousand six hundred and twenty-six full-text reports were critically appraised and 2443 are included in the review so far. Approximately one third of the studies were conducted in Asia and Africa. The reporting quality was generally low with definitions for conditions and the diagnostic methods often not reported. CONCLUSIONS: There are unique challenges and issues regarding the search, critical appraisal and summarizing epidemiological data in this systematic review of prevalence/incidence studies. More methodological studies and discussion to advance the field will be useful. Considerable efforts including leadership, consensus building and resources are required to improve the standards of monitoring burden of disease. BioMed Central 2004-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC481067/ /pubmed/15236664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-16 Text en Copyright © 2004 Gülmezoglu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gülmezoglu, A Metin Say, Lale Betrán, Ana P Villar, Jose Piaggio, Gilda WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges |
title | WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges |
title_full | WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges |
title_fullStr | WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges |
title_short | WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges |
title_sort | who systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC481067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15236664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gulmezogluametin whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges AT saylale whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges AT betrananap whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges AT villarjose whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges AT piaggiogilda whosystematicreviewofmaternalmortalityandmorbiditymethodologicalissuesandchallenges |