Cargando…
Effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of ceramic and composite computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) blocks bonded to dentin using different adhesive strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 30 crowns of soun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4810908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27076825 |
_version_ | 1782423856653271040 |
---|---|
author | Roperto, Renato Akkus, Anna Akkus, Ozan Lang, Lisa Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao Teich, Sorin Porto, Thiago Soares |
author_facet | Roperto, Renato Akkus, Anna Akkus, Ozan Lang, Lisa Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao Teich, Sorin Porto, Thiago Soares |
author_sort | Roperto, Renato |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of ceramic and composite computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) blocks bonded to dentin using different adhesive strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 30 crowns of sound freshly extracted human molars were sectioned horizontally 3 mm above the cementoenamel junction to produce flat dentin surfaces. Ceramic and composite CAD/CAM blocks, size 14, were sectioned into slices of 3 mm thick. Before bonding, CAD/CAM block surfaces were treated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Groups were created based on the adhesive strategy used: Group 1 (GI) - conventional resin cement + total-etch adhesive system, Group 2 (GII) - conventional resin cement + self-etch adhesive system, and Group 3 (GIII) - self-adhesive resin cement with no adhesive. Bonded specimens were stored in 100% humidity for 24h at 37C, and then sectioned with a slow-speed diamond saw to obtain 1 mm × 1 mm × 6 mm microsticks. Microtensile testing was then conducted using a microtensile tester. μTBS values were expressed in MPa and analyzed by one-way ANOVA with post hoc (Tukey) test at the 5% significance level. RESULTS: Mean values and standard deviations of μTBS (MPa) were 17.68 (±2.71) for GI/ceramic; 17.62 (±3.99) for GI/composite; 13.61 (±6.92) for GII/composite; 12.22 (±4.24) for GII/ceramic; 7.47 (±2.29) for GIII/composite; and 6.48 (±3.10) for GIII/ceramic; ANOVA indicated significant differences among the adhesive modality and block interaction (P < 0.05), and no significant differences among blocks only, except between GI and GII/ceramic. Bond strength of GIII was consistently lower (P < 0.05) than GI and GII groups, regardless the block used. CONCLUSION: Cementation of CAD/CAM restorations, either composite or ceramic, can be significantly affected by different adhesive strategies used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4810908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48109082016-04-13 Effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin Roperto, Renato Akkus, Anna Akkus, Ozan Lang, Lisa Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao Teich, Sorin Porto, Thiago Soares Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of ceramic and composite computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) blocks bonded to dentin using different adhesive strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 30 crowns of sound freshly extracted human molars were sectioned horizontally 3 mm above the cementoenamel junction to produce flat dentin surfaces. Ceramic and composite CAD/CAM blocks, size 14, were sectioned into slices of 3 mm thick. Before bonding, CAD/CAM block surfaces were treated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Groups were created based on the adhesive strategy used: Group 1 (GI) - conventional resin cement + total-etch adhesive system, Group 2 (GII) - conventional resin cement + self-etch adhesive system, and Group 3 (GIII) - self-adhesive resin cement with no adhesive. Bonded specimens were stored in 100% humidity for 24h at 37C, and then sectioned with a slow-speed diamond saw to obtain 1 mm × 1 mm × 6 mm microsticks. Microtensile testing was then conducted using a microtensile tester. μTBS values were expressed in MPa and analyzed by one-way ANOVA with post hoc (Tukey) test at the 5% significance level. RESULTS: Mean values and standard deviations of μTBS (MPa) were 17.68 (±2.71) for GI/ceramic; 17.62 (±3.99) for GI/composite; 13.61 (±6.92) for GII/composite; 12.22 (±4.24) for GII/ceramic; 7.47 (±2.29) for GIII/composite; and 6.48 (±3.10) for GIII/ceramic; ANOVA indicated significant differences among the adhesive modality and block interaction (P < 0.05), and no significant differences among blocks only, except between GI and GII/ceramic. Bond strength of GIII was consistently lower (P < 0.05) than GI and GII groups, regardless the block used. CONCLUSION: Cementation of CAD/CAM restorations, either composite or ceramic, can be significantly affected by different adhesive strategies used. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4810908/ /pubmed/27076825 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Roperto, Renato Akkus, Anna Akkus, Ozan Lang, Lisa Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao Teich, Sorin Porto, Thiago Soares Effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin |
title | Effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin |
title_full | Effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin |
title_fullStr | Effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin |
title_short | Effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin |
title_sort | effect of different adhesive strategies on microtensile bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing blocks bonded to dentin |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4810908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27076825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ropertorenato effectofdifferentadhesivestrategiesonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingblocksbondedtodentin AT akkusanna effectofdifferentadhesivestrategiesonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingblocksbondedtodentin AT akkusozan effectofdifferentadhesivestrategiesonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingblocksbondedtodentin AT langlisa effectofdifferentadhesivestrategiesonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingblocksbondedtodentin AT sousanetomanoeldamiao effectofdifferentadhesivestrategiesonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingblocksbondedtodentin AT teichsorin effectofdifferentadhesivestrategiesonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingblocksbondedtodentin AT portothiagosoares effectofdifferentadhesivestrategiesonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingblocksbondedtodentin |