Cargando…

Single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve

CONTEXT: The retroperitoneoscopic or retroperitoneal (RP) surgical approach has not become as popular as the transperitoneal (TP) one due to the steeper learning curve. AIMS: Our single-institution experience focuses on the feasibility, advantages and complications of retroperitoneoscopic surgeries...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srivastava, Aneesh, Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar, Vashishtha, Saurabh, Agarwal, Shikhar, Ansari, Md Saleh, Kumar, Manoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4810941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27073300
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.178517
_version_ 1782423865853476864
author Srivastava, Aneesh
Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar
Vashishtha, Saurabh
Agarwal, Shikhar
Ansari, Md Saleh
Kumar, Manoj
author_facet Srivastava, Aneesh
Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar
Vashishtha, Saurabh
Agarwal, Shikhar
Ansari, Md Saleh
Kumar, Manoj
author_sort Srivastava, Aneesh
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: The retroperitoneoscopic or retroperitoneal (RP) surgical approach has not become as popular as the transperitoneal (TP) one due to the steeper learning curve. AIMS: Our single-institution experience focuses on the feasibility, advantages and complications of retroperitoneoscopic surgeries (RS) performed over the past 10 years. Tips and tricks have been discussed to overcome the steep learning curve and these are emphasised. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study made a retrospective analysis of computerised hospital data of patients who underwent RP urological procedures from 2003 to 2013 at a tertiary care centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2013, 314 cases of RS were performed for various urological procedures. We analysed the operative time, peri-operative complications, time to return of bowel sound, length of hospital stay, and advantages and difficulties involved. Post-operative complications were stratified into five grades using modified Clavien classification (MCC). RESULTS: RS were successfully completed in 95.5% of patients, with 4% of the procedures electively performed by the combined approach (both RP and TP); 3.2% required open conversion and 1.3% were converted to the TP approach. The most common cause for conversion was bleeding. Mean hospital stay was 3.2 ± 1.2 days and the mean time for returning of bowel sounds was 16.5 ± 5.4 h. Of the patients, 1.4% required peri-operative blood transfusion. A total of 16 patients (5%) had post-operative complications and the majority were grades I and II as per MCC. The rates of intra-operative and post-operative complications depended on the difficulty of the procedure, but the complications diminished over the years with the increasing experience of surgeons. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneoscopy has proven an excellent approach, with certain advantages. The tips and tricks that have been provided and emphasised should definitely help to minimise the steep learning curve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4810941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48109412016-04-12 Single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve Srivastava, Aneesh Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar Vashishtha, Saurabh Agarwal, Shikhar Ansari, Md Saleh Kumar, Manoj J Minim Access Surg Original Article CONTEXT: The retroperitoneoscopic or retroperitoneal (RP) surgical approach has not become as popular as the transperitoneal (TP) one due to the steeper learning curve. AIMS: Our single-institution experience focuses on the feasibility, advantages and complications of retroperitoneoscopic surgeries (RS) performed over the past 10 years. Tips and tricks have been discussed to overcome the steep learning curve and these are emphasised. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study made a retrospective analysis of computerised hospital data of patients who underwent RP urological procedures from 2003 to 2013 at a tertiary care centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2013, 314 cases of RS were performed for various urological procedures. We analysed the operative time, peri-operative complications, time to return of bowel sound, length of hospital stay, and advantages and difficulties involved. Post-operative complications were stratified into five grades using modified Clavien classification (MCC). RESULTS: RS were successfully completed in 95.5% of patients, with 4% of the procedures electively performed by the combined approach (both RP and TP); 3.2% required open conversion and 1.3% were converted to the TP approach. The most common cause for conversion was bleeding. Mean hospital stay was 3.2 ± 1.2 days and the mean time for returning of bowel sounds was 16.5 ± 5.4 h. Of the patients, 1.4% required peri-operative blood transfusion. A total of 16 patients (5%) had post-operative complications and the majority were grades I and II as per MCC. The rates of intra-operative and post-operative complications depended on the difficulty of the procedure, but the complications diminished over the years with the increasing experience of surgeons. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneoscopy has proven an excellent approach, with certain advantages. The tips and tricks that have been provided and emphasised should definitely help to minimise the steep learning curve. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4810941/ /pubmed/27073300 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.178517 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Srivastava, Aneesh
Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar
Vashishtha, Saurabh
Agarwal, Shikhar
Ansari, Md Saleh
Kumar, Manoj
Single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve
title Single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve
title_full Single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve
title_fullStr Single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve
title_full_unstemmed Single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve
title_short Single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve
title_sort single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4810941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27073300
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.178517
work_keys_str_mv AT srivastavaaneesh singlecentreexperienceofretroperitoneoscopicapproachinurologywithtipstoovercomethesteeplearningcurve
AT surekasanjoykumar singlecentreexperienceofretroperitoneoscopicapproachinurologywithtipstoovercomethesteeplearningcurve
AT vashishthasaurabh singlecentreexperienceofretroperitoneoscopicapproachinurologywithtipstoovercomethesteeplearningcurve
AT agarwalshikhar singlecentreexperienceofretroperitoneoscopicapproachinurologywithtipstoovercomethesteeplearningcurve
AT ansarimdsaleh singlecentreexperienceofretroperitoneoscopicapproachinurologywithtipstoovercomethesteeplearningcurve
AT kumarmanoj singlecentreexperienceofretroperitoneoscopicapproachinurologywithtipstoovercomethesteeplearningcurve