Cargando…

Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies

Progress in cancer research is coupled with increased treatment complexity reliant upon accurate patient selection. Oncologists rely upon measurement instruments of functional performance such as the Karnofsky or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scales that were developed over f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Ciara M., Shahrokni, Armin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6186543
_version_ 1782423903886376960
author Kelly, Ciara M.
Shahrokni, Armin
author_facet Kelly, Ciara M.
Shahrokni, Armin
author_sort Kelly, Ciara M.
collection PubMed
description Progress in cancer research is coupled with increased treatment complexity reliant upon accurate patient selection. Oncologists rely upon measurement instruments of functional performance such as the Karnofsky or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scales that were developed over fifty years ago to determine a patient's suitability for systemic treatment. These standard assessment tools have been shown to correlate with response to chemotherapy, chemotherapy tolerability, survival, and quality of life of cancer patients. However, these scales are subjective, subject to bias and high interobserver variability. Despite these limitations important clinical decisions are based on PS including eligibility for clinical trials, the “optimal” therapeutic approach in routine practice, and the allocation of healthcare resources. This paper reviews the past, present, and potential future of functional performance status assessment in an oncology setting. The potential ability of electronic activity monitoring systems to provide an objective, accurate measurement of patient functional performance is explored. Electronic activity monitoring devices have the potential to offer positive health-related opportunities to patients; however their introduction to the healthcare setting is not without difficulty. The potential role of this technology in healthcare and the challenges that these new innovations pose to the healthcare industry are also examined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4811104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48111042016-04-10 Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies Kelly, Ciara M. Shahrokni, Armin J Oncol Review Article Progress in cancer research is coupled with increased treatment complexity reliant upon accurate patient selection. Oncologists rely upon measurement instruments of functional performance such as the Karnofsky or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scales that were developed over fifty years ago to determine a patient's suitability for systemic treatment. These standard assessment tools have been shown to correlate with response to chemotherapy, chemotherapy tolerability, survival, and quality of life of cancer patients. However, these scales are subjective, subject to bias and high interobserver variability. Despite these limitations important clinical decisions are based on PS including eligibility for clinical trials, the “optimal” therapeutic approach in routine practice, and the allocation of healthcare resources. This paper reviews the past, present, and potential future of functional performance status assessment in an oncology setting. The potential ability of electronic activity monitoring systems to provide an objective, accurate measurement of patient functional performance is explored. Electronic activity monitoring devices have the potential to offer positive health-related opportunities to patients; however their introduction to the healthcare setting is not without difficulty. The potential role of this technology in healthcare and the challenges that these new innovations pose to the healthcare industry are also examined. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4811104/ /pubmed/27066075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6186543 Text en Copyright © 2016 C. M. Kelly and A. Shahrokni. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kelly, Ciara M.
Shahrokni, Armin
Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies
title Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies
title_full Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies
title_fullStr Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies
title_short Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies
title_sort moving beyond karnofsky and ecog performance status assessments with new technologies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6186543
work_keys_str_mv AT kellyciaram movingbeyondkarnofskyandecogperformancestatusassessmentswithnewtechnologies
AT shahrokniarmin movingbeyondkarnofskyandecogperformancestatusassessmentswithnewtechnologies