Cargando…

Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients

OBJECTIVES: In this study it is aimed to compare the success and complication rates of SWL and RIRS in treatment of HSK stone disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study data of 67 patients treated with either SWL (n=44) or RIRS (n=23) for stone disease in HSK between May 2003 to Aug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gokce, Mehmet Ilker, Tokatli, Zafer, Suer, Evren, Hajiyev, Parviz, Akinci, Aykut, Esen, Baris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27136473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0023
_version_ 1782423919295201280
author Gokce, Mehmet Ilker
Tokatli, Zafer
Suer, Evren
Hajiyev, Parviz
Akinci, Aykut
Esen, Baris
author_facet Gokce, Mehmet Ilker
Tokatli, Zafer
Suer, Evren
Hajiyev, Parviz
Akinci, Aykut
Esen, Baris
author_sort Gokce, Mehmet Ilker
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In this study it is aimed to compare the success and complication rates of SWL and RIRS in treatment of HSK stone disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study data of 67 patients treated with either SWL (n=44) or RIRS (n=23) for stone disease in HSK between May 2003 to August 2014 was investigated. age, gender, stone size and multiplicity, stone free status, renal colic episodes and complication rates of the SWL and RIRS groups were compared. RESULTS: Mean age of the population was 42.5±8.2 (range: 16-78) years and mean stone size was 16.9±4.1 mm. SWL and RIRS groups were similar with regard to demographic characteristics and stone related characteristics. SFR of the SWL and RIRS groups were 47.7%(21/44 patients) and 73.9% (17/23 patients) respectively (p=0.039).Renal colic episodes were observed in 3 and 16 patients in the RIRS and SWL groups respectively (p=0.024). No statistically significant complications were observed between the SWL (8/44 patients) and RIRS (4/23) groups (p=0.936). CONCLUSIONS: In HSK patients with stone disease, both SWL and RIRS are effective and safe treatment modalities. However RIRS seems to maintain higher SFRs with comparable complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4811232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48112322016-05-09 Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients Gokce, Mehmet Ilker Tokatli, Zafer Suer, Evren Hajiyev, Parviz Akinci, Aykut Esen, Baris Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: In this study it is aimed to compare the success and complication rates of SWL and RIRS in treatment of HSK stone disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study data of 67 patients treated with either SWL (n=44) or RIRS (n=23) for stone disease in HSK between May 2003 to August 2014 was investigated. age, gender, stone size and multiplicity, stone free status, renal colic episodes and complication rates of the SWL and RIRS groups were compared. RESULTS: Mean age of the population was 42.5±8.2 (range: 16-78) years and mean stone size was 16.9±4.1 mm. SWL and RIRS groups were similar with regard to demographic characteristics and stone related characteristics. SFR of the SWL and RIRS groups were 47.7%(21/44 patients) and 73.9% (17/23 patients) respectively (p=0.039).Renal colic episodes were observed in 3 and 16 patients in the RIRS and SWL groups respectively (p=0.024). No statistically significant complications were observed between the SWL (8/44 patients) and RIRS (4/23) groups (p=0.936). CONCLUSIONS: In HSK patients with stone disease, both SWL and RIRS are effective and safe treatment modalities. However RIRS seems to maintain higher SFRs with comparable complication rates. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4811232/ /pubmed/27136473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0023 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gokce, Mehmet Ilker
Tokatli, Zafer
Suer, Evren
Hajiyev, Parviz
Akinci, Aykut
Esen, Baris
Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients
title Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients
title_full Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients
title_fullStr Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients
title_short Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients
title_sort comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (swl) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (rirs) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27136473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0023
work_keys_str_mv AT gokcemehmetilker comparisonofshockwavelithotripsyswlandretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsfortreatmentofstonediseaseinhorseshoekidneypatients
AT tokatlizafer comparisonofshockwavelithotripsyswlandretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsfortreatmentofstonediseaseinhorseshoekidneypatients
AT suerevren comparisonofshockwavelithotripsyswlandretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsfortreatmentofstonediseaseinhorseshoekidneypatients
AT hajiyevparviz comparisonofshockwavelithotripsyswlandretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsfortreatmentofstonediseaseinhorseshoekidneypatients
AT akinciaykut comparisonofshockwavelithotripsyswlandretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsfortreatmentofstonediseaseinhorseshoekidneypatients
AT esenbaris comparisonofshockwavelithotripsyswlandretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsfortreatmentofstonediseaseinhorseshoekidneypatients