Cargando…

Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION: After a failed transplant, management of a non-functional graft with pain or recurrent infections can be challenging. Transplant nephrectomy (TN) can be a morbid procedure with the potential for significant blood loss. Embolization of the renal artery alone has been proposed as a metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeast, Carrie, Riley, Julie M., Holyoak, Joshua, Ross, Gilbert, Weinstein, Stephen, Wakefield, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27136475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0052
_version_ 1782423919885549568
author Yeast, Carrie
Riley, Julie M.
Holyoak, Joshua
Ross, Gilbert
Weinstein, Stephen
Wakefield, Mark
author_facet Yeast, Carrie
Riley, Julie M.
Holyoak, Joshua
Ross, Gilbert
Weinstein, Stephen
Wakefield, Mark
author_sort Yeast, Carrie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: After a failed transplant, management of a non-functional graft with pain or recurrent infections can be challenging. Transplant nephrectomy (TN) can be a morbid procedure with the potential for significant blood loss. Embolization of the renal artery alone has been proposed as a method of reducing complications from an in vivo failed kidney transplant. While this does yield less morbidity, it may not address an infected graft or refractory hematuria or rejection. We elected to begin preoperative embolization to assess if this would help decrease the blood loss and transfusion rate associated with TN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent non-emergent TN at our institution. Patients who had functioning grafts that later failed were included in analysis. TN was performed for recurrent infections, pain or hematuria. We evaluated for blood loss (EBL) during TN, transfusion rate and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were identified. Nine had preoperative embolization or no blood flow to the graft prior to TN. The remaining 7 did not have preoperative embolization. The shortest time from transplant to TN was 8 months and the longest 18 years with an average of 6.3 years. Average EBL for the embolized patients (ETN) was 143.9cc compared to 621.4cc in the non-embolized (NETN) group (p=0.041). Average number of units of blood transfused was 0.44 in the ETN with only 3/9 patients requiring transfusion. The NETN patients had average of 1.29 units transfused with 5/7 requiring transfusion. The length of stay was longer for the ETN (5.4 days) compared to 3.9 in the NETN. No intraoperative complications were seen in either group and only one patient had a postoperative ileus in the NETN. CONCLUSION: Embolization prior to TN significantly decreases the EBL but does not significantly decrease transfusion rate. However, patients do require a significantly longer hospitalization with embolization due to the time needed for embolization. Larger studies are needed to determine if embolization before transplant nephrectomy reduces the transfusion rates and overall complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4811234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48112342016-05-09 Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy Yeast, Carrie Riley, Julie M. Holyoak, Joshua Ross, Gilbert Weinstein, Stephen Wakefield, Mark Int Braz J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: After a failed transplant, management of a non-functional graft with pain or recurrent infections can be challenging. Transplant nephrectomy (TN) can be a morbid procedure with the potential for significant blood loss. Embolization of the renal artery alone has been proposed as a method of reducing complications from an in vivo failed kidney transplant. While this does yield less morbidity, it may not address an infected graft or refractory hematuria or rejection. We elected to begin preoperative embolization to assess if this would help decrease the blood loss and transfusion rate associated with TN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent non-emergent TN at our institution. Patients who had functioning grafts that later failed were included in analysis. TN was performed for recurrent infections, pain or hematuria. We evaluated for blood loss (EBL) during TN, transfusion rate and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were identified. Nine had preoperative embolization or no blood flow to the graft prior to TN. The remaining 7 did not have preoperative embolization. The shortest time from transplant to TN was 8 months and the longest 18 years with an average of 6.3 years. Average EBL for the embolized patients (ETN) was 143.9cc compared to 621.4cc in the non-embolized (NETN) group (p=0.041). Average number of units of blood transfused was 0.44 in the ETN with only 3/9 patients requiring transfusion. The NETN patients had average of 1.29 units transfused with 5/7 requiring transfusion. The length of stay was longer for the ETN (5.4 days) compared to 3.9 in the NETN. No intraoperative complications were seen in either group and only one patient had a postoperative ileus in the NETN. CONCLUSION: Embolization prior to TN significantly decreases the EBL but does not significantly decrease transfusion rate. However, patients do require a significantly longer hospitalization with embolization due to the time needed for embolization. Larger studies are needed to determine if embolization before transplant nephrectomy reduces the transfusion rates and overall complications. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4811234/ /pubmed/27136475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0052 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yeast, Carrie
Riley, Julie M.
Holyoak, Joshua
Ross, Gilbert
Weinstein, Stephen
Wakefield, Mark
Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy
title Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy
title_full Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy
title_fullStr Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy
title_short Use of preoperative embolization prior to Transplant nephrectomy
title_sort use of preoperative embolization prior to transplant nephrectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27136475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0052
work_keys_str_mv AT yeastcarrie useofpreoperativeembolizationpriortotransplantnephrectomy
AT rileyjuliem useofpreoperativeembolizationpriortotransplantnephrectomy
AT holyoakjoshua useofpreoperativeembolizationpriortotransplantnephrectomy
AT rossgilbert useofpreoperativeembolizationpriortotransplantnephrectomy
AT weinsteinstephen useofpreoperativeembolizationpriortotransplantnephrectomy
AT wakefieldmark useofpreoperativeembolizationpriortotransplantnephrectomy