Cargando…
Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats
Human decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue inter...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27023442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152592 |
_version_ | 1782423982868267008 |
---|---|
author | Hales, Claire A. Robinson, Emma S. J. Houghton, Conor J. |
author_facet | Hales, Claire A. Robinson, Emma S. J. Houghton, Conor J. |
author_sort | Hales, Claire A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue interpretation task. Acute treatment with an anxiogenic drug (FG7142), and chronic restraint stress and social isolation both induced a bias towards more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue. The diffusion model was fit to behavioural data to allow further analysis of the underlying decision making processes. To uncover the way in which parameters vary together in relation to affective state manipulations, independent component analysis was conducted on rate of information accumulation and distances to decision threshold parameters for control data. Results from this analysis were applied to parameters from negative affective state manipulations. These projected components were compared to control components to reveal the changes in decision making processes that are due to affective state manipulations. Negative affective bias in rodents induced by either FG7142 or chronic stress is due to a combination of more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue, reduced anticipation of the high reward and increased anticipation of the low reward. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4811525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48115252016-04-05 Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats Hales, Claire A. Robinson, Emma S. J. Houghton, Conor J. PLoS One Research Article Human decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue interpretation task. Acute treatment with an anxiogenic drug (FG7142), and chronic restraint stress and social isolation both induced a bias towards more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue. The diffusion model was fit to behavioural data to allow further analysis of the underlying decision making processes. To uncover the way in which parameters vary together in relation to affective state manipulations, independent component analysis was conducted on rate of information accumulation and distances to decision threshold parameters for control data. Results from this analysis were applied to parameters from negative affective state manipulations. These projected components were compared to control components to reveal the changes in decision making processes that are due to affective state manipulations. Negative affective bias in rodents induced by either FG7142 or chronic stress is due to a combination of more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue, reduced anticipation of the high reward and increased anticipation of the low reward. Public Library of Science 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4811525/ /pubmed/27023442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152592 Text en © 2016 Hales et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hales, Claire A. Robinson, Emma S. J. Houghton, Conor J. Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats |
title | Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats |
title_full | Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats |
title_fullStr | Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats |
title_short | Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats |
title_sort | diffusion modelling reveals the decision making processes underlying negative judgement bias in rats |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27023442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152592 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halesclairea diffusionmodellingrevealsthedecisionmakingprocessesunderlyingnegativejudgementbiasinrats AT robinsonemmasj diffusionmodellingrevealsthedecisionmakingprocessesunderlyingnegativejudgementbiasinrats AT houghtonconorj diffusionmodellingrevealsthedecisionmakingprocessesunderlyingnegativejudgementbiasinrats |