Cargando…

Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats

Human decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hales, Claire A., Robinson, Emma S. J., Houghton, Conor J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27023442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152592
_version_ 1782423982868267008
author Hales, Claire A.
Robinson, Emma S. J.
Houghton, Conor J.
author_facet Hales, Claire A.
Robinson, Emma S. J.
Houghton, Conor J.
author_sort Hales, Claire A.
collection PubMed
description Human decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue interpretation task. Acute treatment with an anxiogenic drug (FG7142), and chronic restraint stress and social isolation both induced a bias towards more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue. The diffusion model was fit to behavioural data to allow further analysis of the underlying decision making processes. To uncover the way in which parameters vary together in relation to affective state manipulations, independent component analysis was conducted on rate of information accumulation and distances to decision threshold parameters for control data. Results from this analysis were applied to parameters from negative affective state manipulations. These projected components were compared to control components to reveal the changes in decision making processes that are due to affective state manipulations. Negative affective bias in rodents induced by either FG7142 or chronic stress is due to a combination of more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue, reduced anticipation of the high reward and increased anticipation of the low reward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4811525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48115252016-04-05 Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats Hales, Claire A. Robinson, Emma S. J. Houghton, Conor J. PLoS One Research Article Human decision making is modified by emotional state. Rodents exhibit similar biases during interpretation of ambiguous cues that can be altered by affective state manipulations. In this study, the impact of negative affective state on judgement bias in rats was measured using an ambiguous-cue interpretation task. Acute treatment with an anxiogenic drug (FG7142), and chronic restraint stress and social isolation both induced a bias towards more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue. The diffusion model was fit to behavioural data to allow further analysis of the underlying decision making processes. To uncover the way in which parameters vary together in relation to affective state manipulations, independent component analysis was conducted on rate of information accumulation and distances to decision threshold parameters for control data. Results from this analysis were applied to parameters from negative affective state manipulations. These projected components were compared to control components to reveal the changes in decision making processes that are due to affective state manipulations. Negative affective bias in rodents induced by either FG7142 or chronic stress is due to a combination of more negative interpretation of the ambiguous cue, reduced anticipation of the high reward and increased anticipation of the low reward. Public Library of Science 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4811525/ /pubmed/27023442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152592 Text en © 2016 Hales et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hales, Claire A.
Robinson, Emma S. J.
Houghton, Conor J.
Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats
title Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats
title_full Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats
title_fullStr Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats
title_full_unstemmed Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats
title_short Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats
title_sort diffusion modelling reveals the decision making processes underlying negative judgement bias in rats
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27023442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152592
work_keys_str_mv AT halesclairea diffusionmodellingrevealsthedecisionmakingprocessesunderlyingnegativejudgementbiasinrats
AT robinsonemmasj diffusionmodellingrevealsthedecisionmakingprocessesunderlyingnegativejudgementbiasinrats
AT houghtonconorj diffusionmodellingrevealsthedecisionmakingprocessesunderlyingnegativejudgementbiasinrats