Cargando…

Nocturnal Light Pulses Lower Carbon Dioxide Production Rate without Affecting Feed Intake in Geese

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of nocturnal light pulses (NLPs) on the feed intake and metabolic rate in geese. Fourteen adult Chinese geese were penned individually, and randomly assigned to either the C (control) or NLP group. The C group was exposed to a 12L:12D photoperiod (1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, De-Jia, Yang, Shyi-Kuen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26950871
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0236
_version_ 1782424021554429952
author Huang, De-Jia
Yang, Shyi-Kuen
author_facet Huang, De-Jia
Yang, Shyi-Kuen
author_sort Huang, De-Jia
collection PubMed
description This study was conducted to investigate the effect of nocturnal light pulses (NLPs) on the feed intake and metabolic rate in geese. Fourteen adult Chinese geese were penned individually, and randomly assigned to either the C (control) or NLP group. The C group was exposed to a 12L:12D photoperiod (12 h light and 12 h darkness per day), whereas the NLP group was exposed to a 12L:12D photoperiod inserted by 15-min lighting at 2-h intervals in the scotophase. The weight of the feed was automatically recorded at 1-min intervals for 1 wk. The fasting carbon dioxide production rate (CO(2) PR) was recorded at 1-min intervals for 1 d. The results revealed that neither the daily feed intake nor the feed intakes during both the daytime and nighttime were affected by photoperiodic regimen, and the feed intake during the daytime did not differ from that during the nighttime. The photoperiodic treatment did not affect the time distribution of feed intake. However, NLPs lowered (p<0.05) the mean and minimal CO(2) PR during both the daytime and nighttime. Both the mean and minimal CO(2) PR during the daytime were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those during the nighttime. We concluded that NLPs lowered metabolic rate of the geese, but did not affect the feed intake; both the mean and minimal CO(2) PR were higher during the daytime than during the nighttime.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4811791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48117912016-04-05 Nocturnal Light Pulses Lower Carbon Dioxide Production Rate without Affecting Feed Intake in Geese Huang, De-Jia Yang, Shyi-Kuen Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article This study was conducted to investigate the effect of nocturnal light pulses (NLPs) on the feed intake and metabolic rate in geese. Fourteen adult Chinese geese were penned individually, and randomly assigned to either the C (control) or NLP group. The C group was exposed to a 12L:12D photoperiod (12 h light and 12 h darkness per day), whereas the NLP group was exposed to a 12L:12D photoperiod inserted by 15-min lighting at 2-h intervals in the scotophase. The weight of the feed was automatically recorded at 1-min intervals for 1 wk. The fasting carbon dioxide production rate (CO(2) PR) was recorded at 1-min intervals for 1 d. The results revealed that neither the daily feed intake nor the feed intakes during both the daytime and nighttime were affected by photoperiodic regimen, and the feed intake during the daytime did not differ from that during the nighttime. The photoperiodic treatment did not affect the time distribution of feed intake. However, NLPs lowered (p<0.05) the mean and minimal CO(2) PR during both the daytime and nighttime. Both the mean and minimal CO(2) PR during the daytime were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those during the nighttime. We concluded that NLPs lowered metabolic rate of the geese, but did not affect the feed intake; both the mean and minimal CO(2) PR were higher during the daytime than during the nighttime. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2016-03 2016-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4811791/ /pubmed/26950871 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0236 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Huang, De-Jia
Yang, Shyi-Kuen
Nocturnal Light Pulses Lower Carbon Dioxide Production Rate without Affecting Feed Intake in Geese
title Nocturnal Light Pulses Lower Carbon Dioxide Production Rate without Affecting Feed Intake in Geese
title_full Nocturnal Light Pulses Lower Carbon Dioxide Production Rate without Affecting Feed Intake in Geese
title_fullStr Nocturnal Light Pulses Lower Carbon Dioxide Production Rate without Affecting Feed Intake in Geese
title_full_unstemmed Nocturnal Light Pulses Lower Carbon Dioxide Production Rate without Affecting Feed Intake in Geese
title_short Nocturnal Light Pulses Lower Carbon Dioxide Production Rate without Affecting Feed Intake in Geese
title_sort nocturnal light pulses lower carbon dioxide production rate without affecting feed intake in geese
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26950871
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0236
work_keys_str_mv AT huangdejia nocturnallightpulseslowercarbondioxideproductionratewithoutaffectingfeedintakeingeese
AT yangshyikuen nocturnallightpulseslowercarbondioxideproductionratewithoutaffectingfeedintakeingeese