Cargando…

Including Online-Recruited Seeds: A Respondent-Driven Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men

BACKGROUND: Technology has changed the way men who have sex with men (MSM) seek sex and socialize, which may impact the implementation of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) among this population. Initial participants (also known as seeds) are a critical consideration in RDS because they begin the recr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lachowsky, Nathan John, Lal, Allan, Forrest, Jamie I, Card, Kiffer George, Cui, Zishan, Sereda, Paul, Rich, Ashleigh, Raymond, Henry Fisher, Roth, Eric A, Moore, David M, Hogg, Robert S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4812046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26980147
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5258
_version_ 1782424084739522560
author Lachowsky, Nathan John
Lal, Allan
Forrest, Jamie I
Card, Kiffer George
Cui, Zishan
Sereda, Paul
Rich, Ashleigh
Raymond, Henry Fisher
Roth, Eric A
Moore, David M
Hogg, Robert S
author_facet Lachowsky, Nathan John
Lal, Allan
Forrest, Jamie I
Card, Kiffer George
Cui, Zishan
Sereda, Paul
Rich, Ashleigh
Raymond, Henry Fisher
Roth, Eric A
Moore, David M
Hogg, Robert S
author_sort Lachowsky, Nathan John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technology has changed the way men who have sex with men (MSM) seek sex and socialize, which may impact the implementation of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) among this population. Initial participants (also known as seeds) are a critical consideration in RDS because they begin the recruitment chains. However, little information is available on how the online-recruited seeds may effect RDS implementation. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to compare (1) online-recruited versus offline-recruited seeds and (2) subsequent recruitment chains of online-recruited versus offline-recruited seeds. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2014, we recruited MSM using RDS in Vancouver, Canada. RDS weights were used with logistic regression to address each objective. RESULTS: A total of 119 seeds were used, 85 of whom were online-recruited seeds, to recruit an additional 600 MSM. Compared with offline-recruited seeds, online-recruited seeds were less likely to be HIV-positive (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.88), to have attended a gay community group (AOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.90), and to feel gay community involvement was “very important” (AOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.93). Online-recruited seeds were more likely to ask a sexual partner’s HIV status always versus <50% of the time (AOR 5.21, 95% CI 1.17-23.23), to have watched the Pride parade (AOR 6.30, 95% CI 1.69-23.45), and to have sought sex online (AOR 4.29, 95% CI 1.53-12-12.05). Further, compared with recruitment chains started by offline-recruited seeds, recruits from chains started by online-recruited seeds (283/600, 47.2%) were less likely to be HIV-positive (AOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.16-0.40), to report “versatile” versus “bottom” sexual position preference (AOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.88), and to be in a relationship lasting >1 year (AOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06-2.56). Recruits of online seeds were more likely to be out as gay for longer (eg, 11-21 vs 1-4 years, AOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.27-3.88) and have fewer Facebook friends (eg, 201-500 vs >500, AOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.02-2.80). CONCLUSIONS: Online-recruited seeds were more prevalent, recruited fewer participants, but were different from those recruited offline. This may therefore help create a more diverse overall sample. Our work has shown the value of geosocial networking apps for aiding RDS recruitment efforts, especially when faced with slow participation uptake by other means. Understanding the degree to which networks interact will be an important next step in confirming the efficacy of online RDS recruitment strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4812046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48120462016-04-15 Including Online-Recruited Seeds: A Respondent-Driven Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men Lachowsky, Nathan John Lal, Allan Forrest, Jamie I Card, Kiffer George Cui, Zishan Sereda, Paul Rich, Ashleigh Raymond, Henry Fisher Roth, Eric A Moore, David M Hogg, Robert S J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Technology has changed the way men who have sex with men (MSM) seek sex and socialize, which may impact the implementation of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) among this population. Initial participants (also known as seeds) are a critical consideration in RDS because they begin the recruitment chains. However, little information is available on how the online-recruited seeds may effect RDS implementation. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to compare (1) online-recruited versus offline-recruited seeds and (2) subsequent recruitment chains of online-recruited versus offline-recruited seeds. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2014, we recruited MSM using RDS in Vancouver, Canada. RDS weights were used with logistic regression to address each objective. RESULTS: A total of 119 seeds were used, 85 of whom were online-recruited seeds, to recruit an additional 600 MSM. Compared with offline-recruited seeds, online-recruited seeds were less likely to be HIV-positive (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.88), to have attended a gay community group (AOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.90), and to feel gay community involvement was “very important” (AOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.93). Online-recruited seeds were more likely to ask a sexual partner’s HIV status always versus <50% of the time (AOR 5.21, 95% CI 1.17-23.23), to have watched the Pride parade (AOR 6.30, 95% CI 1.69-23.45), and to have sought sex online (AOR 4.29, 95% CI 1.53-12-12.05). Further, compared with recruitment chains started by offline-recruited seeds, recruits from chains started by online-recruited seeds (283/600, 47.2%) were less likely to be HIV-positive (AOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.16-0.40), to report “versatile” versus “bottom” sexual position preference (AOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.88), and to be in a relationship lasting >1 year (AOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06-2.56). Recruits of online seeds were more likely to be out as gay for longer (eg, 11-21 vs 1-4 years, AOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.27-3.88) and have fewer Facebook friends (eg, 201-500 vs >500, AOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.02-2.80). CONCLUSIONS: Online-recruited seeds were more prevalent, recruited fewer participants, but were different from those recruited offline. This may therefore help create a more diverse overall sample. Our work has shown the value of geosocial networking apps for aiding RDS recruitment efforts, especially when faced with slow participation uptake by other means. Understanding the degree to which networks interact will be an important next step in confirming the efficacy of online RDS recruitment strategies. JMIR Publications Inc. 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4812046/ /pubmed/26980147 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5258 Text en ©Nathan John Lachowsky, Allan Lal, Jamie I Forrest, Kiffer George Card, Zishan Cui, Paul Sereda, Ashleigh Rich, Henry Fisher Raymond, Eric A Roth, David M Moore, Robert S Hogg. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.03.2016. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lachowsky, Nathan John
Lal, Allan
Forrest, Jamie I
Card, Kiffer George
Cui, Zishan
Sereda, Paul
Rich, Ashleigh
Raymond, Henry Fisher
Roth, Eric A
Moore, David M
Hogg, Robert S
Including Online-Recruited Seeds: A Respondent-Driven Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men
title Including Online-Recruited Seeds: A Respondent-Driven Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men
title_full Including Online-Recruited Seeds: A Respondent-Driven Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men
title_fullStr Including Online-Recruited Seeds: A Respondent-Driven Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men
title_full_unstemmed Including Online-Recruited Seeds: A Respondent-Driven Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men
title_short Including Online-Recruited Seeds: A Respondent-Driven Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men
title_sort including online-recruited seeds: a respondent-driven sample of men who have sex with men
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4812046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26980147
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5258
work_keys_str_mv AT lachowskynathanjohn includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT lalallan includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT forrestjamiei includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT cardkiffergeorge includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT cuizishan includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT seredapaul includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT richashleigh includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT raymondhenryfisher includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT rotherica includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT mooredavidm includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT hoggroberts includingonlinerecruitedseedsarespondentdrivensampleofmenwhohavesexwithmen