Cargando…

Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist

Background and study aims: In many Dutch hospitals, open access referral for colonoscopy is authorized by a gastroenterologist after screening a standard referral letter (SRL) without face-to-face contact with the patient. We investigated the added value of a 7.5 min outpatient consultation with a g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wichers, C. D., van Heel, N. C.M., ter Borg, F., van Herwaarden, M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4812814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27054194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377325
_version_ 1782424216675549184
author Wichers, C. D.
van Heel, N. C.M.
ter Borg, F.
van Herwaarden, M. A.
author_facet Wichers, C. D.
van Heel, N. C.M.
ter Borg, F.
van Herwaarden, M. A.
author_sort Wichers, C. D.
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims: In many Dutch hospitals, open access referral for colonoscopy is authorized by a gastroenterologist after screening a standard referral letter (SRL) without face-to-face contact with the patient. We investigated the added value of a 7.5 min outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist (OC), regarding the patient indications, priority for colonoscopy, and the frequency of correct information about patient medications and comorbidities on SRLs. Patients and methods: In a prospective, blinded, single-center study, gastroenterologists assessed SRLs for the accuracy and priority of the colonoscopy request (SRL). These data were compared to results from the OC, and primary outcomes were the number of patients who were not recommended for colonoscopy and priority scheduling of colonoscopy for suspicion of cancer. Results: Patients were analyzed using both SRL and OC and, of 255 patients, 224 of them underwent colonoscopy. Colonoscopy was not recommended for 6.3 % and 11.4 % of patients using the SRL and OC, respectively (P = 0.02). Using the SRL, gastroenterologists did not recommend colonoscopy for seven patients, but the same patients were recommended for colonoscopy when OC was available. This was explained because the indications on the SRL did not match the information obtained from OC. Compared to OC , more colonoscopies were prioritized when the SRL was used to make decisions. Cancer was detected in 7/112 (SRL ) versus 7/65 (OC ) of priority-scheduled patients. SRLs did not report the use of coumarins and insulin in 1.6 % of patients or the prevalence of serious comorbid conditions in 52 % of patients. Conclusions: A 7.5 min outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist improved the identification of indications for colonoscopy, decreased priority scheduling of patients, and increased the number of patients diagnosed with cancer in the prioritized group. SRLs frequently omitted patients’ medications and comorbidities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4812814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48128142016-04-06 Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist Wichers, C. D. van Heel, N. C.M. ter Borg, F. van Herwaarden, M. A. Endosc Int Open Article Background and study aims: In many Dutch hospitals, open access referral for colonoscopy is authorized by a gastroenterologist after screening a standard referral letter (SRL) without face-to-face contact with the patient. We investigated the added value of a 7.5 min outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist (OC), regarding the patient indications, priority for colonoscopy, and the frequency of correct information about patient medications and comorbidities on SRLs. Patients and methods: In a prospective, blinded, single-center study, gastroenterologists assessed SRLs for the accuracy and priority of the colonoscopy request (SRL). These data were compared to results from the OC, and primary outcomes were the number of patients who were not recommended for colonoscopy and priority scheduling of colonoscopy for suspicion of cancer. Results: Patients were analyzed using both SRL and OC and, of 255 patients, 224 of them underwent colonoscopy. Colonoscopy was not recommended for 6.3 % and 11.4 % of patients using the SRL and OC, respectively (P = 0.02). Using the SRL, gastroenterologists did not recommend colonoscopy for seven patients, but the same patients were recommended for colonoscopy when OC was available. This was explained because the indications on the SRL did not match the information obtained from OC. Compared to OC , more colonoscopies were prioritized when the SRL was used to make decisions. Cancer was detected in 7/112 (SRL ) versus 7/65 (OC ) of priority-scheduled patients. SRLs did not report the use of coumarins and insulin in 1.6 % of patients or the prevalence of serious comorbid conditions in 52 % of patients. Conclusions: A 7.5 min outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist improved the identification of indications for colonoscopy, decreased priority scheduling of patients, and increased the number of patients diagnosed with cancer in the prioritized group. SRLs frequently omitted patients’ medications and comorbidities. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2014-09 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4812814/ /pubmed/27054194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377325 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Wichers, C. D.
van Heel, N. C.M.
ter Borg, F.
van Herwaarden, M. A.
Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist
title Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist
title_full Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist
title_fullStr Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist
title_full_unstemmed Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist
title_short Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist
title_sort triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4812814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27054194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377325
work_keys_str_mv AT wicherscd triageofcolonoscopiesopenaccessendoscopyversusoutpatientconsultationwithagastroenterologist
AT vanheelncm triageofcolonoscopiesopenaccessendoscopyversusoutpatientconsultationwithagastroenterologist
AT terborgf triageofcolonoscopiesopenaccessendoscopyversusoutpatientconsultationwithagastroenterologist
AT vanherwaardenma triageofcolonoscopiesopenaccessendoscopyversusoutpatientconsultationwithagastroenterologist