Cargando…

Comparative accuracy of CT, dual-echo MRI and MR spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors

BACKGROUND: It is of significant importance to assess the extent of hepatic steatosis in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) surgery to ensure optimum graft regeneration as well as donor safety. AIM: To establish the accuracy of non-invasive imaging methods including computed tomography (CT), dual-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rastogi, Ruchi, Gupta, Subhash, Garg, Bhavya, Vohra, Sandeep, Wadhawan, Manav, Rastogi, Harsh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4813074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27081218
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.178281
_version_ 1782424230482149376
author Rastogi, Ruchi
Gupta, Subhash
Garg, Bhavya
Vohra, Sandeep
Wadhawan, Manav
Rastogi, Harsh
author_facet Rastogi, Ruchi
Gupta, Subhash
Garg, Bhavya
Vohra, Sandeep
Wadhawan, Manav
Rastogi, Harsh
author_sort Rastogi, Ruchi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is of significant importance to assess the extent of hepatic steatosis in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) surgery to ensure optimum graft regeneration as well as donor safety. AIM: To establish the accuracy of non-invasive imaging methods including computed tomography (CT), dual-echo in- and opposed-phase magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MR spectroscopy (MRS) for quantification of liver fat content (FC) in prospective LDLT donors with histopathology as reference standard. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This retrospective study was conducted at our institution on LDLT donors being assessed for biliary and vascular anatomy depiction by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and CT scan, respectively, between July 2013 and October 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Liver FC was measured in 73 donors by dual-echoT1 MRI and MRS. Of these, CT liver attenuation index (LAI) values were available in 62 patients. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: CT and MRI FC were correlated with histopathological reference standard using Spearman correlation coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predicative value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals were obtained. RESULTS: CT LAI, dual-echo MRI, and MRS correlated well with the histopathology results (r = 0.713, 0.871, and 0.882, respectively). An accuracy of 95% and 96% was obtained for dual-echo MRI and MRS in FC estimation with their sensitivity being 97% and 94%, respectively. False-positive rate, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predicative value (NPV) were 0.08, 0.92, and 0.97, respectively, for dual-echo MRI and 0.03, 0.97, and 0.95, respectively, for MRS. CT LAI method of fat estimation has a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 73%, 77.7%, 70.4%, and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dual-echo MRI, MRS, and CT LAI are accurate measures to quantify the degree of hepatic steatosis in LDLT donors, thus reducing the need for invasive liver biopsy and its associated complications. Dual-echo MRI and MRS results correlate better with histological results in the study, as compared to CT LAI method for fat quantification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4813074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48130742016-04-14 Comparative accuracy of CT, dual-echo MRI and MR spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors Rastogi, Ruchi Gupta, Subhash Garg, Bhavya Vohra, Sandeep Wadhawan, Manav Rastogi, Harsh Indian J Radiol Imaging Abdomen BACKGROUND: It is of significant importance to assess the extent of hepatic steatosis in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) surgery to ensure optimum graft regeneration as well as donor safety. AIM: To establish the accuracy of non-invasive imaging methods including computed tomography (CT), dual-echo in- and opposed-phase magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MR spectroscopy (MRS) for quantification of liver fat content (FC) in prospective LDLT donors with histopathology as reference standard. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This retrospective study was conducted at our institution on LDLT donors being assessed for biliary and vascular anatomy depiction by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and CT scan, respectively, between July 2013 and October 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Liver FC was measured in 73 donors by dual-echoT1 MRI and MRS. Of these, CT liver attenuation index (LAI) values were available in 62 patients. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: CT and MRI FC were correlated with histopathological reference standard using Spearman correlation coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predicative value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals were obtained. RESULTS: CT LAI, dual-echo MRI, and MRS correlated well with the histopathology results (r = 0.713, 0.871, and 0.882, respectively). An accuracy of 95% and 96% was obtained for dual-echo MRI and MRS in FC estimation with their sensitivity being 97% and 94%, respectively. False-positive rate, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predicative value (NPV) were 0.08, 0.92, and 0.97, respectively, for dual-echo MRI and 0.03, 0.97, and 0.95, respectively, for MRS. CT LAI method of fat estimation has a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 73%, 77.7%, 70.4%, and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dual-echo MRI, MRS, and CT LAI are accurate measures to quantify the degree of hepatic steatosis in LDLT donors, thus reducing the need for invasive liver biopsy and its associated complications. Dual-echo MRI and MRS results correlate better with histological results in the study, as compared to CT LAI method for fat quantification. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4813074/ /pubmed/27081218 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.178281 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Abdomen
Rastogi, Ruchi
Gupta, Subhash
Garg, Bhavya
Vohra, Sandeep
Wadhawan, Manav
Rastogi, Harsh
Comparative accuracy of CT, dual-echo MRI and MR spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors
title Comparative accuracy of CT, dual-echo MRI and MR spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors
title_full Comparative accuracy of CT, dual-echo MRI and MR spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors
title_fullStr Comparative accuracy of CT, dual-echo MRI and MR spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors
title_full_unstemmed Comparative accuracy of CT, dual-echo MRI and MR spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors
title_short Comparative accuracy of CT, dual-echo MRI and MR spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors
title_sort comparative accuracy of ct, dual-echo mri and mr spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors
topic Abdomen
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4813074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27081218
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.178281
work_keys_str_mv AT rastogiruchi comparativeaccuracyofctdualechomriandmrspectroscopyforpreoperativeliverfatquantificationinlivingrelatedliverdonors
AT guptasubhash comparativeaccuracyofctdualechomriandmrspectroscopyforpreoperativeliverfatquantificationinlivingrelatedliverdonors
AT gargbhavya comparativeaccuracyofctdualechomriandmrspectroscopyforpreoperativeliverfatquantificationinlivingrelatedliverdonors
AT vohrasandeep comparativeaccuracyofctdualechomriandmrspectroscopyforpreoperativeliverfatquantificationinlivingrelatedliverdonors
AT wadhawanmanav comparativeaccuracyofctdualechomriandmrspectroscopyforpreoperativeliverfatquantificationinlivingrelatedliverdonors
AT rastogiharsh comparativeaccuracyofctdualechomriandmrspectroscopyforpreoperativeliverfatquantificationinlivingrelatedliverdonors