Cargando…

Results obtained with a low cost software-based audiometer for hearing screening

Introduction: The implementation of hearing screening programs can be facilitated by reducing operating costs, including the cost of equipment. The Telessaúde (TS) audiometer is a low-cost, software-based, and easy-to-use piece of equipment for conducting audiometric screening. Aim: To evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrari, Deborah Viviane, Lopez, Esteban Alejandro, Lopes, Andrea Cintra, Aiello, Camila Piccini, Jokura, Pricila Reis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Publicações Ltda 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4813096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27053951
http://dx.doi.org/10.7162/S1809-97772013000300005
_version_ 1782424235398922240
author Ferrari, Deborah Viviane
Lopez, Esteban Alejandro
Lopes, Andrea Cintra
Aiello, Camila Piccini
Jokura, Pricila Reis
author_facet Ferrari, Deborah Viviane
Lopez, Esteban Alejandro
Lopes, Andrea Cintra
Aiello, Camila Piccini
Jokura, Pricila Reis
author_sort Ferrari, Deborah Viviane
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The implementation of hearing screening programs can be facilitated by reducing operating costs, including the cost of equipment. The Telessaúde (TS) audiometer is a low-cost, software-based, and easy-to-use piece of equipment for conducting audiometric screening. Aim: To evaluate the TS audiometer for conducting audiometric screening. Methods: A prospective randomized study was performed. Sixty subjects, divided into those who did not have (group A, n = 30) and those who had otologic complaints (group B, n = 30), underwent audiometric screening with conventional and TS audiometers in a randomized order. Pure tones at 25 dB HL were presented at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. A “fail” result was considered when the individual failed to respond to at least one of the stimuli. Pure-tone audiometry was also performed on all participants. The concordance of the results of screening with both audiometers was evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of screening with the TS audiometer were calculated. Results: For group A, 100% of the ears tested passed the screening. For group B, “pass” results were obtained in 34.2% (TS) and 38.3% (conventional) of the ears tested. The agreement between procedures (TS vs. conventional) ranged from 93% to 98%. For group B, screening with the TS audiometer showed 95.5% sensitivity, 90.4% sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values equal to 94.9% and 91.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The results of the TS audiometer were similar to those obtained with the conventional audiometer, indicating that the TS audiometer can be used for audiometric screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4813096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Thieme Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48130962016-04-06 Results obtained with a low cost software-based audiometer for hearing screening Ferrari, Deborah Viviane Lopez, Esteban Alejandro Lopes, Andrea Cintra Aiello, Camila Piccini Jokura, Pricila Reis Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Article Introduction: The implementation of hearing screening programs can be facilitated by reducing operating costs, including the cost of equipment. The Telessaúde (TS) audiometer is a low-cost, software-based, and easy-to-use piece of equipment for conducting audiometric screening. Aim: To evaluate the TS audiometer for conducting audiometric screening. Methods: A prospective randomized study was performed. Sixty subjects, divided into those who did not have (group A, n = 30) and those who had otologic complaints (group B, n = 30), underwent audiometric screening with conventional and TS audiometers in a randomized order. Pure tones at 25 dB HL were presented at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. A “fail” result was considered when the individual failed to respond to at least one of the stimuli. Pure-tone audiometry was also performed on all participants. The concordance of the results of screening with both audiometers was evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of screening with the TS audiometer were calculated. Results: For group A, 100% of the ears tested passed the screening. For group B, “pass” results were obtained in 34.2% (TS) and 38.3% (conventional) of the ears tested. The agreement between procedures (TS vs. conventional) ranged from 93% to 98%. For group B, screening with the TS audiometer showed 95.5% sensitivity, 90.4% sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values equal to 94.9% and 91.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The results of the TS audiometer were similar to those obtained with the conventional audiometer, indicating that the TS audiometer can be used for audiometric screening. Thieme Publicações Ltda 2013-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4813096/ /pubmed/27053951 http://dx.doi.org/10.7162/S1809-97772013000300005 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Ferrari, Deborah Viviane
Lopez, Esteban Alejandro
Lopes, Andrea Cintra
Aiello, Camila Piccini
Jokura, Pricila Reis
Results obtained with a low cost software-based audiometer for hearing screening
title Results obtained with a low cost software-based audiometer for hearing screening
title_full Results obtained with a low cost software-based audiometer for hearing screening
title_fullStr Results obtained with a low cost software-based audiometer for hearing screening
title_full_unstemmed Results obtained with a low cost software-based audiometer for hearing screening
title_short Results obtained with a low cost software-based audiometer for hearing screening
title_sort results obtained with a low cost software-based audiometer for hearing screening
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4813096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27053951
http://dx.doi.org/10.7162/S1809-97772013000300005
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrarideborahviviane resultsobtainedwithalowcostsoftwarebasedaudiometerforhearingscreening
AT lopezestebanalejandro resultsobtainedwithalowcostsoftwarebasedaudiometerforhearingscreening
AT lopesandreacintra resultsobtainedwithalowcostsoftwarebasedaudiometerforhearingscreening
AT aiellocamilapiccini resultsobtainedwithalowcostsoftwarebasedaudiometerforhearingscreening
AT jokurapricilareis resultsobtainedwithalowcostsoftwarebasedaudiometerforhearingscreening