Cargando…
How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation?
A large amount of data for inconspicuous taxa is stored in natural history collections; however, this information is often neglected for biodiversity patterns studies. Here, we evaluate the performance of direct interpolation of museum collections data, equivalent to the traditional approach used in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4813098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1796 |
_version_ | 1782424235933696000 |
---|---|
author | Hespanhol, Helena Cezón, Katia Felicísimo, Ángel M. Muñoz, Jesús Mateo, Rubén G. |
author_facet | Hespanhol, Helena Cezón, Katia Felicísimo, Ángel M. Muñoz, Jesús Mateo, Rubén G. |
author_sort | Hespanhol, Helena |
collection | PubMed |
description | A large amount of data for inconspicuous taxa is stored in natural history collections; however, this information is often neglected for biodiversity patterns studies. Here, we evaluate the performance of direct interpolation of museum collections data, equivalent to the traditional approach used in bryophyte conservation planning, and stacked species distribution models (S‐SDMs) to produce reliable reconstructions of species richness patterns, given that differences between these methods have been insufficiently evaluated for inconspicuous taxa. Our objective was to contrast if species distribution models produce better inferences of diversity richness than simply selecting areas with the higher species numbers. As model species, we selected Iberian species of the genus Grimmia (Bryophyta), and we used four well‐collected areas to compare and validate the following models: 1) four Maxent richness models, each generated without the data from one of the four areas, and a reference model created using all of the data and 2) four richness models obtained through direct spatial interpolation, each generated without the data from one area, and a reference model created with all of the data. The correlations between the partial and reference Maxent models were higher in all cases (0.45 to 0.99), whereas the correlations between the spatial interpolation models were negative and weak (−0.3 to −0.06). Our results demonstrate for the first time that S‐SDMs offer a useful tool for identifying detailed richness patterns for inconspicuous taxa such as bryophytes and improving incomplete distributions by assessing the potential richness of under‐surveyed areas, filling major gaps in the available data. In addition, the proposed strategy would enhance the value of the vast number of specimens housed in biological collections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4813098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48130982016-04-11 How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation? Hespanhol, Helena Cezón, Katia Felicísimo, Ángel M. Muñoz, Jesús Mateo, Rubén G. Ecol Evol Original Research A large amount of data for inconspicuous taxa is stored in natural history collections; however, this information is often neglected for biodiversity patterns studies. Here, we evaluate the performance of direct interpolation of museum collections data, equivalent to the traditional approach used in bryophyte conservation planning, and stacked species distribution models (S‐SDMs) to produce reliable reconstructions of species richness patterns, given that differences between these methods have been insufficiently evaluated for inconspicuous taxa. Our objective was to contrast if species distribution models produce better inferences of diversity richness than simply selecting areas with the higher species numbers. As model species, we selected Iberian species of the genus Grimmia (Bryophyta), and we used four well‐collected areas to compare and validate the following models: 1) four Maxent richness models, each generated without the data from one of the four areas, and a reference model created using all of the data and 2) four richness models obtained through direct spatial interpolation, each generated without the data from one area, and a reference model created with all of the data. The correlations between the partial and reference Maxent models were higher in all cases (0.45 to 0.99), whereas the correlations between the spatial interpolation models were negative and weak (−0.3 to −0.06). Our results demonstrate for the first time that S‐SDMs offer a useful tool for identifying detailed richness patterns for inconspicuous taxa such as bryophytes and improving incomplete distributions by assessing the potential richness of under‐surveyed areas, filling major gaps in the available data. In addition, the proposed strategy would enhance the value of the vast number of specimens housed in biological collections. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4813098/ /pubmed/27069596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1796 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hespanhol, Helena Cezón, Katia Felicísimo, Ángel M. Muñoz, Jesús Mateo, Rubén G. How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation? |
title | How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation? |
title_full | How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation? |
title_fullStr | How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation? |
title_full_unstemmed | How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation? |
title_short | How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation? |
title_sort | how to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4813098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hespanholhelena howtodescribespeciesrichnesspatternsforbryophyteconservation AT cezonkatia howtodescribespeciesrichnesspatternsforbryophyteconservation AT felicisimoangelm howtodescribespeciesrichnesspatternsforbryophyteconservation AT munozjesus howtodescribespeciesrichnesspatternsforbryophyteconservation AT mateorubeng howtodescribespeciesrichnesspatternsforbryophyteconservation |