Cargando…
Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya
BACKGROUND: Animal hosts may vary in their attraction and acceptability as components of the host location process for assessing preference, and biting rates of vectors and risk of exposure to pathogens. However, these parameters remain poorly understood for mosquito vectors of the Rift Valley fever...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1473-x |
_version_ | 1782424549281759232 |
---|---|
author | Tchouassi, David P. Okiro, Robinson O. K. Sang, Rosemary Cohnstaedt, Lee W. McVey, David Scott Torto, Baldwyn |
author_facet | Tchouassi, David P. Okiro, Robinson O. K. Sang, Rosemary Cohnstaedt, Lee W. McVey, David Scott Torto, Baldwyn |
author_sort | Tchouassi, David P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Animal hosts may vary in their attraction and acceptability as components of the host location process for assessing preference, and biting rates of vectors and risk of exposure to pathogens. However, these parameters remain poorly understood for mosquito vectors of the Rift Valley fever (RVF), an arboviral disease, and for a community of mosquitoes. METHODS: Using three known livestock amplifiers of RVF virus including sheep, goat and cattle as bait in enclosure traps, we investigated the host-feeding patterns for a community of mosquitoes in Naivasha, an endemic area of Rift Valley fever (RVF), in a longitudinal study for six months (June–November 2015). We estimated the incidence rate ratios (IRR) where mosquitoes chose cow over the other livestock hosts by comparing their attraction (total number collected) and engorgement rate (proportion freshly blood-fed) on these hosts. RESULTS: Overall, significant differences were observed in host preference parameters for attraction (F(2,15) = 4.1314, P = 0.037) and engorgement (F(2,15) = 6.24, P = 0.01) with cow consistently attracting about 3-fold as many mosquitoes as those engorged on sheep (attraction: IRR = 2.9, 95 % CI 1.24–7.96; engorgement: IRR = 3.2, 95 % CI = 1.38–7.38) or goat (attraction: IRR = 2.7, 95 % CI 1.18–7.16; engorgement: IRR = 3.28, 95 % CI 1.47–7.53). However, there was no difference between the attraction elicited by sheep and goat (IRR = 1.08; 95 % CI 0.35–3.33 or engorgement rate (IRR = 0.96, 95 % CI 0.36–2.57). CONCLUSION: Despite the overall attractive pattern to feed preferentially on cows, the engorgement rate was clearly independent of the number attracted for certain mosquito species, notably among the flood water Aedes spp., largely incriminated previously as primary vectors of RVF. Our findings suggest that insecticide treated cattle (ITC) can be exploited in enclosure traps as contact bait in the monitoring and control of disease-causing mosquitoes in RVF endemic areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4815150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48151502016-04-01 Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya Tchouassi, David P. Okiro, Robinson O. K. Sang, Rosemary Cohnstaedt, Lee W. McVey, David Scott Torto, Baldwyn Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Animal hosts may vary in their attraction and acceptability as components of the host location process for assessing preference, and biting rates of vectors and risk of exposure to pathogens. However, these parameters remain poorly understood for mosquito vectors of the Rift Valley fever (RVF), an arboviral disease, and for a community of mosquitoes. METHODS: Using three known livestock amplifiers of RVF virus including sheep, goat and cattle as bait in enclosure traps, we investigated the host-feeding patterns for a community of mosquitoes in Naivasha, an endemic area of Rift Valley fever (RVF), in a longitudinal study for six months (June–November 2015). We estimated the incidence rate ratios (IRR) where mosquitoes chose cow over the other livestock hosts by comparing their attraction (total number collected) and engorgement rate (proportion freshly blood-fed) on these hosts. RESULTS: Overall, significant differences were observed in host preference parameters for attraction (F(2,15) = 4.1314, P = 0.037) and engorgement (F(2,15) = 6.24, P = 0.01) with cow consistently attracting about 3-fold as many mosquitoes as those engorged on sheep (attraction: IRR = 2.9, 95 % CI 1.24–7.96; engorgement: IRR = 3.2, 95 % CI = 1.38–7.38) or goat (attraction: IRR = 2.7, 95 % CI 1.18–7.16; engorgement: IRR = 3.28, 95 % CI 1.47–7.53). However, there was no difference between the attraction elicited by sheep and goat (IRR = 1.08; 95 % CI 0.35–3.33 or engorgement rate (IRR = 0.96, 95 % CI 0.36–2.57). CONCLUSION: Despite the overall attractive pattern to feed preferentially on cows, the engorgement rate was clearly independent of the number attracted for certain mosquito species, notably among the flood water Aedes spp., largely incriminated previously as primary vectors of RVF. Our findings suggest that insecticide treated cattle (ITC) can be exploited in enclosure traps as contact bait in the monitoring and control of disease-causing mosquitoes in RVF endemic areas. BioMed Central 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4815150/ /pubmed/27036889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1473-x Text en © Tchouassi et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Tchouassi, David P. Okiro, Robinson O. K. Sang, Rosemary Cohnstaedt, Lee W. McVey, David Scott Torto, Baldwyn Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya |
title | Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya |
title_full | Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya |
title_fullStr | Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya |
title_full_unstemmed | Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya |
title_short | Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya |
title_sort | mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of rift valley fever virus in kenya |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1473-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tchouassidavidp mosquitohostchoicesonlivestockamplifiersofriftvalleyfevervirusinkenya AT okirorobinsonok mosquitohostchoicesonlivestockamplifiersofriftvalleyfevervirusinkenya AT sangrosemary mosquitohostchoicesonlivestockamplifiersofriftvalleyfevervirusinkenya AT cohnstaedtleew mosquitohostchoicesonlivestockamplifiersofriftvalleyfevervirusinkenya AT mcveydavidscott mosquitohostchoicesonlivestockamplifiersofriftvalleyfevervirusinkenya AT tortobaldwyn mosquitohostchoicesonlivestockamplifiersofriftvalleyfevervirusinkenya |