Cargando…

Representing vision and blindness

BACKGROUND: There have been relatively few attempts to represent vision or blindness ontologically. This is unsurprising as the related phenomena of sight and blindness are difficult to represent ontologically for a variety of reasons. Blindness has escaped ontological capture at least in part becau...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ray, Patrick L., Cox, Alexander P., Jensen, Mark, Allen, Travis, Duncan, William, Diehl, Alexander D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27034769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-016-0058-0
_version_ 1782424571320729600
author Ray, Patrick L.
Cox, Alexander P.
Jensen, Mark
Allen, Travis
Duncan, William
Diehl, Alexander D.
author_facet Ray, Patrick L.
Cox, Alexander P.
Jensen, Mark
Allen, Travis
Duncan, William
Diehl, Alexander D.
author_sort Ray, Patrick L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There have been relatively few attempts to represent vision or blindness ontologically. This is unsurprising as the related phenomena of sight and blindness are difficult to represent ontologically for a variety of reasons. Blindness has escaped ontological capture at least in part because: blindness or the employment of the term ‘blindness’ seems to vary from context to context, blindness can present in a myriad of types and degrees, and there is no precedent for representing complex phenomena such as blindness. METHODS: We explore current attempts to represent vision or blindness, and show how these attempts fail at representing subtypes of blindness (viz., color blindness, flash blindness, and inattentional blindness). We examine the results found through a review of current attempts and identify where they have failed. RESULTS: By analyzing our test cases of different types of blindness along with the strengths and weaknesses of previous attempts, we have identified the general features of blindness and vision. We propose an ontological solution to represent vision and blindness, which capitalizes on resources afforded to one who utilizes the Basic Formal Ontology as an upper-level ontology. CONCLUSIONS: The solution we propose here involves specifying the trigger conditions of a disposition as well as the processes that realize that disposition. Once these are specified we can characterize vision as a function that is realized by certain (in this case) biological processes under a range of triggering conditions. When the range of conditions under which the processes can be realized are reduced beyond a certain threshold, we are able to say that blindness is present. We characterize vision as a function that is realized as a seeing process and blindness as a reduction in the conditions under which the sight function is realized. This solution is desirable because it leverages current features of a major upper-level ontology, accurately captures the phenomenon of blindness, and can be implemented in many domain-specific ontologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4815270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48152702016-04-01 Representing vision and blindness Ray, Patrick L. Cox, Alexander P. Jensen, Mark Allen, Travis Duncan, William Diehl, Alexander D. J Biomed Semantics Research BACKGROUND: There have been relatively few attempts to represent vision or blindness ontologically. This is unsurprising as the related phenomena of sight and blindness are difficult to represent ontologically for a variety of reasons. Blindness has escaped ontological capture at least in part because: blindness or the employment of the term ‘blindness’ seems to vary from context to context, blindness can present in a myriad of types and degrees, and there is no precedent for representing complex phenomena such as blindness. METHODS: We explore current attempts to represent vision or blindness, and show how these attempts fail at representing subtypes of blindness (viz., color blindness, flash blindness, and inattentional blindness). We examine the results found through a review of current attempts and identify where they have failed. RESULTS: By analyzing our test cases of different types of blindness along with the strengths and weaknesses of previous attempts, we have identified the general features of blindness and vision. We propose an ontological solution to represent vision and blindness, which capitalizes on resources afforded to one who utilizes the Basic Formal Ontology as an upper-level ontology. CONCLUSIONS: The solution we propose here involves specifying the trigger conditions of a disposition as well as the processes that realize that disposition. Once these are specified we can characterize vision as a function that is realized by certain (in this case) biological processes under a range of triggering conditions. When the range of conditions under which the processes can be realized are reduced beyond a certain threshold, we are able to say that blindness is present. We characterize vision as a function that is realized as a seeing process and blindness as a reduction in the conditions under which the sight function is realized. This solution is desirable because it leverages current features of a major upper-level ontology, accurately captures the phenomenon of blindness, and can be implemented in many domain-specific ontologies. BioMed Central 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4815270/ /pubmed/27034769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-016-0058-0 Text en © Ray et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ray, Patrick L.
Cox, Alexander P.
Jensen, Mark
Allen, Travis
Duncan, William
Diehl, Alexander D.
Representing vision and blindness
title Representing vision and blindness
title_full Representing vision and blindness
title_fullStr Representing vision and blindness
title_full_unstemmed Representing vision and blindness
title_short Representing vision and blindness
title_sort representing vision and blindness
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27034769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-016-0058-0
work_keys_str_mv AT raypatrickl representingvisionandblindness
AT coxalexanderp representingvisionandblindness
AT jensenmark representingvisionandblindness
AT allentravis representingvisionandblindness
AT duncanwilliam representingvisionandblindness
AT diehlalexanderd representingvisionandblindness