Cargando…

Protein dynamics and the all‐ferrous [Fe(4) S (4)] cluster in the nitrogenase iron protein

In nitrogen fixation by Azotobacter vinelandii nitrogenase, the iron protein (FeP) binds to and subsequently transfers electrons to the molybdenum–FeP, which contains the nitrogen fixation site, along with hydrolysis of two ATPs. However, the nature of the reduced state cluster is not completely cle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Ming‐Liang, Perrin, B. Scott, Niu, Shuqiang, Huang, Qi, Ichiye, Toshiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26271353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.2772
Descripción
Sumario:In nitrogen fixation by Azotobacter vinelandii nitrogenase, the iron protein (FeP) binds to and subsequently transfers electrons to the molybdenum–FeP, which contains the nitrogen fixation site, along with hydrolysis of two ATPs. However, the nature of the reduced state cluster is not completely clear. While reduced FeP is generally thought to contain an [Fe(4)S(4)](1+) cluster, evidence also exists for an all‐ferrous [Fe(4)S(4)](0) cluster. Since the former indicates a single electron is transferred per two ATPs hydrolyzed while the latter indicates two electrons could be transferred per two ATPs hydrolyzed, an all‐ferrous [Fe(4)S(4)](0) cluster in FeP is potenially two times more efficient. However, the 1+/0 reduction potential has been measured in the protein at both 460 and 790 mV, causing the biological significance to be questioned. Here, “density functional theory plus Poisson Boltzmann” calculations show that cluster movement relative to the protein surface observed in the crystal structures could account for both measured values. In addition, elastic network mode analysis indicates that such movement occurs in low frequency vibrations of the protein, implying protein dynamics might lead to variations in reduction potential. Furthermore, the different reductants used in the conflicting measurements of the reduction potential could be differentially affecting the protein dynamics. Moreover, even if the all‐ferrous cluster is not the biologically relevant cluster, mutagenesis to stabilize the conformation with the more exposed cluster may be useful for bioengineering more efficient enzymes.