Cargando…
A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors
INTRODUCTION: (11)C-methonine ([(11)C]-MET) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a well-established technique for evaluation of tumor for diagnosis and treatment planning in neurooncology. [(11)C]-MET reflects amino acid transport and has been shown to be more sensitive than...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095856 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.178254 |
_version_ | 1782424590311489536 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Rajnish D’Souza, Maria Jaimini, Abhinav Hazari, Puja Panwar Saw, Sanjeev Pandey, Santosh Singh, Dinesh Solanki, Yachna Kumar, Nitin Mishra, Anil K. Mondal, Anupam |
author_facet | Sharma, Rajnish D’Souza, Maria Jaimini, Abhinav Hazari, Puja Panwar Saw, Sanjeev Pandey, Santosh Singh, Dinesh Solanki, Yachna Kumar, Nitin Mishra, Anil K. Mondal, Anupam |
author_sort | Sharma, Rajnish |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: (11)C-methonine ([(11)C]-MET) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a well-established technique for evaluation of tumor for diagnosis and treatment planning in neurooncology. [(11)C]-MET reflects amino acid transport and has been shown to be more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in stereotactic biopsy planning. This study compared fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT and MET PET-CT in the detection of various brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four subjects of brain tumor treated by surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy were subjected to [(18)F]-FDG, [(11)C]-MET, and MRI scan. The lesion was analyzed semiquantitatively using tumor to normal contralateral ratio. The diagnosis was confirmed by surgery, stereotactic biopsy, clinical follow-up, MRI, or CT scans. RESULTS: Tumor recurrence was found in 5 out of 22 patients on [F-18] FDG scan while [(11)C]-MET was able to detect recurrence in 18 out of 22 patients in low-grade gliomas. Two of these patients were false positive for the presence of recurrence of tumor and later found to be harboring necrosis. Among oligodendroglioma, medulloblastoma and high-grade glioma out of 42 patients 39 were found to be concordant MET and FDG scans. On semiquantitative analysis, mean T/NT ratio was found to be 2.96 ± 0.94 for lesions positive for recurrence of tumors and 1.18 ± 0.74 for lesions negative for recurrence of tumor on [(11)C]-MET scan. While the ratio for FDG scan on semiquantitative analysis was found to be 2.05 ± 1.04 for lesions positive for recurrence of tumors and 0.52 ± 0.15 for lesions negative for recurrence of tumors. CONCLUSION: The study highlight that [(11)C]-MET is superior to [(18)F]-FDG PET scans to detect recurrence in low-grade glioma. A cut-off value of target to nontarget value of 1.47 is a useful parameter to distinguish benign from malignant lesion on an [(11)C]-MET Scan. Both [(18)F]-FDG and [(11)C]-MET scans were found to be useful in high-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and medulloblastoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4815400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48154002016-04-19 A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors Sharma, Rajnish D’Souza, Maria Jaimini, Abhinav Hazari, Puja Panwar Saw, Sanjeev Pandey, Santosh Singh, Dinesh Solanki, Yachna Kumar, Nitin Mishra, Anil K. Mondal, Anupam Indian J Nucl Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: (11)C-methonine ([(11)C]-MET) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a well-established technique for evaluation of tumor for diagnosis and treatment planning in neurooncology. [(11)C]-MET reflects amino acid transport and has been shown to be more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in stereotactic biopsy planning. This study compared fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT and MET PET-CT in the detection of various brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four subjects of brain tumor treated by surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy were subjected to [(18)F]-FDG, [(11)C]-MET, and MRI scan. The lesion was analyzed semiquantitatively using tumor to normal contralateral ratio. The diagnosis was confirmed by surgery, stereotactic biopsy, clinical follow-up, MRI, or CT scans. RESULTS: Tumor recurrence was found in 5 out of 22 patients on [F-18] FDG scan while [(11)C]-MET was able to detect recurrence in 18 out of 22 patients in low-grade gliomas. Two of these patients were false positive for the presence of recurrence of tumor and later found to be harboring necrosis. Among oligodendroglioma, medulloblastoma and high-grade glioma out of 42 patients 39 were found to be concordant MET and FDG scans. On semiquantitative analysis, mean T/NT ratio was found to be 2.96 ± 0.94 for lesions positive for recurrence of tumors and 1.18 ± 0.74 for lesions negative for recurrence of tumor on [(11)C]-MET scan. While the ratio for FDG scan on semiquantitative analysis was found to be 2.05 ± 1.04 for lesions positive for recurrence of tumors and 0.52 ± 0.15 for lesions negative for recurrence of tumors. CONCLUSION: The study highlight that [(11)C]-MET is superior to [(18)F]-FDG PET scans to detect recurrence in low-grade glioma. A cut-off value of target to nontarget value of 1.47 is a useful parameter to distinguish benign from malignant lesion on an [(11)C]-MET Scan. Both [(18)F]-FDG and [(11)C]-MET scans were found to be useful in high-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and medulloblastoma. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4815400/ /pubmed/27095856 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.178254 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Rajnish D’Souza, Maria Jaimini, Abhinav Hazari, Puja Panwar Saw, Sanjeev Pandey, Santosh Singh, Dinesh Solanki, Yachna Kumar, Nitin Mishra, Anil K. Mondal, Anupam A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors |
title | A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors |
title_full | A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors |
title_fullStr | A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors |
title_short | A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors |
title_sort | comparison study of (11)c-methionine and (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095856 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.178254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmarajnish acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT dsouzamaria acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT jaiminiabhinav acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT hazaripujapanwar acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT sawsanjeev acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT pandeysantosh acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT singhdinesh acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT solankiyachna acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT kumarnitin acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT mishraanilk acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT mondalanupam acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT sharmarajnish comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT dsouzamaria comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT jaiminiabhinav comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT hazaripujapanwar comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT sawsanjeev comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT pandeysantosh comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT singhdinesh comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT solankiyachna comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT kumarnitin comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT mishraanilk comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors AT mondalanupam comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors |