Cargando…

A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors

INTRODUCTION: (11)C-methonine ([(11)C]-MET) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a well-established technique for evaluation of tumor for diagnosis and treatment planning in neurooncology. [(11)C]-MET reflects amino acid transport and has been shown to be more sensitive than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Rajnish, D’Souza, Maria, Jaimini, Abhinav, Hazari, Puja Panwar, Saw, Sanjeev, Pandey, Santosh, Singh, Dinesh, Solanki, Yachna, Kumar, Nitin, Mishra, Anil K., Mondal, Anupam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095856
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.178254
_version_ 1782424590311489536
author Sharma, Rajnish
D’Souza, Maria
Jaimini, Abhinav
Hazari, Puja Panwar
Saw, Sanjeev
Pandey, Santosh
Singh, Dinesh
Solanki, Yachna
Kumar, Nitin
Mishra, Anil K.
Mondal, Anupam
author_facet Sharma, Rajnish
D’Souza, Maria
Jaimini, Abhinav
Hazari, Puja Panwar
Saw, Sanjeev
Pandey, Santosh
Singh, Dinesh
Solanki, Yachna
Kumar, Nitin
Mishra, Anil K.
Mondal, Anupam
author_sort Sharma, Rajnish
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: (11)C-methonine ([(11)C]-MET) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a well-established technique for evaluation of tumor for diagnosis and treatment planning in neurooncology. [(11)C]-MET reflects amino acid transport and has been shown to be more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in stereotactic biopsy planning. This study compared fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT and MET PET-CT in the detection of various brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four subjects of brain tumor treated by surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy were subjected to [(18)F]-FDG, [(11)C]-MET, and MRI scan. The lesion was analyzed semiquantitatively using tumor to normal contralateral ratio. The diagnosis was confirmed by surgery, stereotactic biopsy, clinical follow-up, MRI, or CT scans. RESULTS: Tumor recurrence was found in 5 out of 22 patients on [F-18] FDG scan while [(11)C]-MET was able to detect recurrence in 18 out of 22 patients in low-grade gliomas. Two of these patients were false positive for the presence of recurrence of tumor and later found to be harboring necrosis. Among oligodendroglioma, medulloblastoma and high-grade glioma out of 42 patients 39 were found to be concordant MET and FDG scans. On semiquantitative analysis, mean T/NT ratio was found to be 2.96 ± 0.94 for lesions positive for recurrence of tumors and 1.18 ± 0.74 for lesions negative for recurrence of tumor on [(11)C]-MET scan. While the ratio for FDG scan on semiquantitative analysis was found to be 2.05 ± 1.04 for lesions positive for recurrence of tumors and 0.52 ± 0.15 for lesions negative for recurrence of tumors. CONCLUSION: The study highlight that [(11)C]-MET is superior to [(18)F]-FDG PET scans to detect recurrence in low-grade glioma. A cut-off value of target to nontarget value of 1.47 is a useful parameter to distinguish benign from malignant lesion on an [(11)C]-MET Scan. Both [(18)F]-FDG and [(11)C]-MET scans were found to be useful in high-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and medulloblastoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4815400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48154002016-04-19 A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors Sharma, Rajnish D’Souza, Maria Jaimini, Abhinav Hazari, Puja Panwar Saw, Sanjeev Pandey, Santosh Singh, Dinesh Solanki, Yachna Kumar, Nitin Mishra, Anil K. Mondal, Anupam Indian J Nucl Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: (11)C-methonine ([(11)C]-MET) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a well-established technique for evaluation of tumor for diagnosis and treatment planning in neurooncology. [(11)C]-MET reflects amino acid transport and has been shown to be more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in stereotactic biopsy planning. This study compared fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT and MET PET-CT in the detection of various brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four subjects of brain tumor treated by surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy were subjected to [(18)F]-FDG, [(11)C]-MET, and MRI scan. The lesion was analyzed semiquantitatively using tumor to normal contralateral ratio. The diagnosis was confirmed by surgery, stereotactic biopsy, clinical follow-up, MRI, or CT scans. RESULTS: Tumor recurrence was found in 5 out of 22 patients on [F-18] FDG scan while [(11)C]-MET was able to detect recurrence in 18 out of 22 patients in low-grade gliomas. Two of these patients were false positive for the presence of recurrence of tumor and later found to be harboring necrosis. Among oligodendroglioma, medulloblastoma and high-grade glioma out of 42 patients 39 were found to be concordant MET and FDG scans. On semiquantitative analysis, mean T/NT ratio was found to be 2.96 ± 0.94 for lesions positive for recurrence of tumors and 1.18 ± 0.74 for lesions negative for recurrence of tumor on [(11)C]-MET scan. While the ratio for FDG scan on semiquantitative analysis was found to be 2.05 ± 1.04 for lesions positive for recurrence of tumors and 0.52 ± 0.15 for lesions negative for recurrence of tumors. CONCLUSION: The study highlight that [(11)C]-MET is superior to [(18)F]-FDG PET scans to detect recurrence in low-grade glioma. A cut-off value of target to nontarget value of 1.47 is a useful parameter to distinguish benign from malignant lesion on an [(11)C]-MET Scan. Both [(18)F]-FDG and [(11)C]-MET scans were found to be useful in high-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and medulloblastoma. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4815400/ /pubmed/27095856 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.178254 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Rajnish
D’Souza, Maria
Jaimini, Abhinav
Hazari, Puja Panwar
Saw, Sanjeev
Pandey, Santosh
Singh, Dinesh
Solanki, Yachna
Kumar, Nitin
Mishra, Anil K.
Mondal, Anupam
A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors
title A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors
title_full A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors
title_fullStr A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors
title_full_unstemmed A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors
title_short A comparison study of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors
title_sort comparison study of (11)c-methionine and (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in evaluation of patients with recurrent brain tumors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095856
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.178254
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmarajnish acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT dsouzamaria acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT jaiminiabhinav acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT hazaripujapanwar acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT sawsanjeev acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT pandeysantosh acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT singhdinesh acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT solankiyachna acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT kumarnitin acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT mishraanilk acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT mondalanupam acomparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT sharmarajnish comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT dsouzamaria comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT jaiminiabhinav comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT hazaripujapanwar comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT sawsanjeev comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT pandeysantosh comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT singhdinesh comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT solankiyachna comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT kumarnitin comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT mishraanilk comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors
AT mondalanupam comparisonstudyof11cmethionineand18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyscansinevaluationofpatientswithrecurrentbraintumors