Cargando…
What Is the Best Way to Identify Malignant Transformation Within Pancreatic IPMN: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias (IPMNs) represent 25% of all cystic neoplasms and are precursor lesions for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study aims to identify the best imaging modality for detecting malignant transformation in IPMN, the sensitivity and spe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2015.60 |
_version_ | 1782424660749582336 |
---|---|
author | Sultana, Asma Jackson, Richard Tim, Gilbert Bostock, Emma Psarelli, Eftychia E Cox, Trevor F Sutton, Robert Ghaneh, Paula Raraty, Michael G T Neoptolemos, John P Halloran, Christopher M |
author_facet | Sultana, Asma Jackson, Richard Tim, Gilbert Bostock, Emma Psarelli, Eftychia E Cox, Trevor F Sutton, Robert Ghaneh, Paula Raraty, Michael G T Neoptolemos, John P Halloran, Christopher M |
author_sort | Sultana, Asma |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias (IPMNs) represent 25% of all cystic neoplasms and are precursor lesions for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study aims to identify the best imaging modality for detecting malignant transformation in IPMN, the sensitivity and specificity of risk features on imaging, and the usefulness of tumor markers in serum and cyst fluid to predict malignancy in IPMN. METHODS: Databases were searched from November 2006 to March 2014. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic techniques/imaging features of suspected malignancy in IPMN using a hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic (HSROC) approach were performed. RESULTS: A total of 467 eligible studies were identified, of which 51 studies met the inclusion criteria and 37 of these were incorporated into meta-analyses. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for risk features predictive of malignancy on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging were 0.809 and 0.762 respectively, and on positron emission tomography were 0.968 and 0.911. Mural nodule, cyst size, and main pancreatic duct dilation found on imaging had pooled sensitivity for prediction of malignancy of 0.690, 0.682, and 0.614, respectively, and specificity of 0.798, 0.574, and 0.687. Raised serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels yielded sensitivity of 0.380 and specificity of 0903. Combining parameters yielded a sensitivity of 0.743 and specificity of 0.906. CONCLUSIONS: PET holds the most promise in identifying malignant transformation within an IPMN. Combining parameters increases sensitivity and specificity; the presence of mural nodule on imaging was the most sensitive whereas raised serum CA19-9 (>37 KU/l) was the most specific feature predictive of malignancy in IPMNs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4816095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48160952016-04-13 What Is the Best Way to Identify Malignant Transformation Within Pancreatic IPMN: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Sultana, Asma Jackson, Richard Tim, Gilbert Bostock, Emma Psarelli, Eftychia E Cox, Trevor F Sutton, Robert Ghaneh, Paula Raraty, Michael G T Neoptolemos, John P Halloran, Christopher M Clin Transl Gastroenterol Clinical/Narrative Review OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias (IPMNs) represent 25% of all cystic neoplasms and are precursor lesions for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study aims to identify the best imaging modality for detecting malignant transformation in IPMN, the sensitivity and specificity of risk features on imaging, and the usefulness of tumor markers in serum and cyst fluid to predict malignancy in IPMN. METHODS: Databases were searched from November 2006 to March 2014. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic techniques/imaging features of suspected malignancy in IPMN using a hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic (HSROC) approach were performed. RESULTS: A total of 467 eligible studies were identified, of which 51 studies met the inclusion criteria and 37 of these were incorporated into meta-analyses. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for risk features predictive of malignancy on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging were 0.809 and 0.762 respectively, and on positron emission tomography were 0.968 and 0.911. Mural nodule, cyst size, and main pancreatic duct dilation found on imaging had pooled sensitivity for prediction of malignancy of 0.690, 0.682, and 0.614, respectively, and specificity of 0.798, 0.574, and 0.687. Raised serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels yielded sensitivity of 0.380 and specificity of 0903. Combining parameters yielded a sensitivity of 0.743 and specificity of 0.906. CONCLUSIONS: PET holds the most promise in identifying malignant transformation within an IPMN. Combining parameters increases sensitivity and specificity; the presence of mural nodule on imaging was the most sensitive whereas raised serum CA19-9 (>37 KU/l) was the most specific feature predictive of malignancy in IPMNs. Nature Publishing Group 2015-12 2015-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4816095/ /pubmed/26658837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2015.60 Text en Copyright © 2015 American College of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical/Narrative Review Sultana, Asma Jackson, Richard Tim, Gilbert Bostock, Emma Psarelli, Eftychia E Cox, Trevor F Sutton, Robert Ghaneh, Paula Raraty, Michael G T Neoptolemos, John P Halloran, Christopher M What Is the Best Way to Identify Malignant Transformation Within Pancreatic IPMN: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses |
title | What Is the Best Way to Identify Malignant Transformation Within Pancreatic IPMN: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses |
title_full | What Is the Best Way to Identify Malignant Transformation Within Pancreatic IPMN: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses |
title_fullStr | What Is the Best Way to Identify Malignant Transformation Within Pancreatic IPMN: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | What Is the Best Way to Identify Malignant Transformation Within Pancreatic IPMN: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses |
title_short | What Is the Best Way to Identify Malignant Transformation Within Pancreatic IPMN: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses |
title_sort | what is the best way to identify malignant transformation within pancreatic ipmn: a systematic review and meta-analyses |
topic | Clinical/Narrative Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2015.60 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sultanaasma whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT jacksonrichard whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT timgilbert whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT bostockemma whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT psarellieftychiae whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT coxtrevorf whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT suttonrobert whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT ghanehpaula whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT raratymichaelgt whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT neoptolemosjohnp whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT halloranchristopherm whatisthebestwaytoidentifymalignanttransformationwithinpancreaticipmnasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses |