Cargando…

Frequency of orthodontic extraction

INTRODUCTION: The option of dental extraction for orthodontic purposes has been debated for more than 100 years, including periods when it was widely used in treatment, including the present, during which other methods are used to avoid dental extractions. The objective was to analyze the frequency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dardengo, Camila de S., Fernandes, Luciana Q. P., Capelli, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.054-059.oar
_version_ 1782424746599645184
author Dardengo, Camila de S.
Fernandes, Luciana Q. P.
Capelli, Jonas
author_facet Dardengo, Camila de S.
Fernandes, Luciana Q. P.
Capelli, Jonas
author_sort Dardengo, Camila de S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The option of dental extraction for orthodontic purposes has been debated for more than 100 years, including periods when it was widely used in treatment, including the present, during which other methods are used to avoid dental extractions. The objective was to analyze the frequency of tooth extraction treatment performed between 1980 and 2011 at the Orthodontic Clinic of Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical records of 1484 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were evaluated. The frequency of extractions was evaluated with regard to sex, Angle's classification, the different combinations of extractions and the period when orthodontic treatment began. Chi-square test was used to determine correlations between variables, while the chi-square test for trends was used to assess the frequency of extractions over the years. RESULTS: There was a reduction of approximately 20% in the frequency of cases treated with tooth extraction over the last 32 years. The most frequently extracted teeth were first premolars. Patients with Class I malocclusion showed fewer extractions, while Class II patients underwent a higher number of extraction treatment. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to sex. CONCLUSION: New features introduced into the orthodontic clinic and new esthetic concepts contributed to reducing the number of cases treated with dental extractions. However, dental extractions for orthodontic purposes are still well indicated in certain cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4816586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48165862016-04-13 Frequency of orthodontic extraction Dardengo, Camila de S. Fernandes, Luciana Q. P. Capelli, Jonas Dental Press J Orthod Articles INTRODUCTION: The option of dental extraction for orthodontic purposes has been debated for more than 100 years, including periods when it was widely used in treatment, including the present, during which other methods are used to avoid dental extractions. The objective was to analyze the frequency of tooth extraction treatment performed between 1980 and 2011 at the Orthodontic Clinic of Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical records of 1484 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were evaluated. The frequency of extractions was evaluated with regard to sex, Angle's classification, the different combinations of extractions and the period when orthodontic treatment began. Chi-square test was used to determine correlations between variables, while the chi-square test for trends was used to assess the frequency of extractions over the years. RESULTS: There was a reduction of approximately 20% in the frequency of cases treated with tooth extraction over the last 32 years. The most frequently extracted teeth were first premolars. Patients with Class I malocclusion showed fewer extractions, while Class II patients underwent a higher number of extraction treatment. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to sex. CONCLUSION: New features introduced into the orthodontic clinic and new esthetic concepts contributed to reducing the number of cases treated with dental extractions. However, dental extractions for orthodontic purposes are still well indicated in certain cases. Dental Press International 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4816586/ /pubmed/27007762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.054-059.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Articles
Dardengo, Camila de S.
Fernandes, Luciana Q. P.
Capelli, Jonas
Frequency of orthodontic extraction
title Frequency of orthodontic extraction
title_full Frequency of orthodontic extraction
title_fullStr Frequency of orthodontic extraction
title_full_unstemmed Frequency of orthodontic extraction
title_short Frequency of orthodontic extraction
title_sort frequency of orthodontic extraction
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.054-059.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT dardengocamilades frequencyoforthodonticextraction
AT fernandeslucianaqp frequencyoforthodonticextraction
AT capellijonas frequencyoforthodonticextraction