Cargando…
Judging orthodontic treatment complexity
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate possible relations between anticipated overall treatment complexity (AOTC) of an orthodontic case and malocclusion characteristics. METHODS: Two groups of orthodontists (groups A and B) were asked to define perceived treatment complexity (PT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.060-066.oar |
_version_ | 1782424746821943296 |
---|---|
author | Clijmans, Maïté Medhat, Aly Geest, An De van Gastel, Johannes Kellens, Annelies Fieuws, Steffen Willems, Guy |
author_facet | Clijmans, Maïté Medhat, Aly Geest, An De van Gastel, Johannes Kellens, Annelies Fieuws, Steffen Willems, Guy |
author_sort | Clijmans, Maïté |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate possible relations between anticipated overall treatment complexity (AOTC) of an orthodontic case and malocclusion characteristics. METHODS: Two groups of orthodontists (groups A and B) were asked to define perceived treatment complexity (PTC) of orthodontic cases based on 16 characteristics of malocclusion by means of a questionnaire. Each question was answered on a six-point ordinal scale, with one "not applicable" option (score 0). Group A was also asked to give the AOTC of the specific case on a five-point ordinal scale. The index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) score of the specific cases as well as the malocclusion characteristics were assessed by one author. RESULTS: There is a significant relationship between IOTN and AOTC (p< 0.0001), 22% of variability is explained by differences in IOTN. Adding objective characteristics of malocclusion to explain AOTC does not significantly increase the explained variability (p = 0.086). In judging interobserver agreement, a weighted Kappa of 0.60 for group A and 0.56 for group B was found. The weighted Kappa for agreement in AOTC equals 0.06. CONCLUSION: The relation between IOTN and AOTC was found to be significant. Moderate agreement on PTC among observers and a low level agreement regarding AOTC were found in the present study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4816587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48165872016-04-13 Judging orthodontic treatment complexity Clijmans, Maïté Medhat, Aly Geest, An De van Gastel, Johannes Kellens, Annelies Fieuws, Steffen Willems, Guy Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate possible relations between anticipated overall treatment complexity (AOTC) of an orthodontic case and malocclusion characteristics. METHODS: Two groups of orthodontists (groups A and B) were asked to define perceived treatment complexity (PTC) of orthodontic cases based on 16 characteristics of malocclusion by means of a questionnaire. Each question was answered on a six-point ordinal scale, with one "not applicable" option (score 0). Group A was also asked to give the AOTC of the specific case on a five-point ordinal scale. The index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) score of the specific cases as well as the malocclusion characteristics were assessed by one author. RESULTS: There is a significant relationship between IOTN and AOTC (p< 0.0001), 22% of variability is explained by differences in IOTN. Adding objective characteristics of malocclusion to explain AOTC does not significantly increase the explained variability (p = 0.086). In judging interobserver agreement, a weighted Kappa of 0.60 for group A and 0.56 for group B was found. The weighted Kappa for agreement in AOTC equals 0.06. CONCLUSION: The relation between IOTN and AOTC was found to be significant. Moderate agreement on PTC among observers and a low level agreement regarding AOTC were found in the present study. Dental Press International 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4816587/ /pubmed/27007763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.060-066.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Articles Clijmans, Maïté Medhat, Aly Geest, An De van Gastel, Johannes Kellens, Annelies Fieuws, Steffen Willems, Guy Judging orthodontic treatment complexity |
title | Judging orthodontic treatment complexity |
title_full | Judging orthodontic treatment complexity |
title_fullStr | Judging orthodontic treatment complexity |
title_full_unstemmed | Judging orthodontic treatment complexity |
title_short | Judging orthodontic treatment complexity |
title_sort | judging orthodontic treatment complexity |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.060-066.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clijmansmaite judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity AT medhataly judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity AT geestande judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity AT vangasteljohannes judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity AT kellensannelies judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity AT fieuwssteffen judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity AT willemsguy judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity |