Cargando…

Judging orthodontic treatment complexity

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate possible relations between anticipated overall treatment complexity (AOTC) of an orthodontic case and malocclusion characteristics. METHODS: Two groups of orthodontists (groups A and B) were asked to define perceived treatment complexity (PT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clijmans, Maïté, Medhat, Aly, Geest, An De, van Gastel, Johannes, Kellens, Annelies, Fieuws, Steffen, Willems, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.060-066.oar
_version_ 1782424746821943296
author Clijmans, Maïté
Medhat, Aly
Geest, An De
van Gastel, Johannes
Kellens, Annelies
Fieuws, Steffen
Willems, Guy
author_facet Clijmans, Maïté
Medhat, Aly
Geest, An De
van Gastel, Johannes
Kellens, Annelies
Fieuws, Steffen
Willems, Guy
author_sort Clijmans, Maïté
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate possible relations between anticipated overall treatment complexity (AOTC) of an orthodontic case and malocclusion characteristics. METHODS: Two groups of orthodontists (groups A and B) were asked to define perceived treatment complexity (PTC) of orthodontic cases based on 16 characteristics of malocclusion by means of a questionnaire. Each question was answered on a six-point ordinal scale, with one "not applicable" option (score 0). Group A was also asked to give the AOTC of the specific case on a five-point ordinal scale. The index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) score of the specific cases as well as the malocclusion characteristics were assessed by one author. RESULTS: There is a significant relationship between IOTN and AOTC (p< 0.0001), 22% of variability is explained by differences in IOTN. Adding objective characteristics of malocclusion to explain AOTC does not significantly increase the explained variability (p = 0.086). In judging interobserver agreement, a weighted Kappa of 0.60 for group A and 0.56 for group B was found. The weighted Kappa for agreement in AOTC equals 0.06. CONCLUSION: The relation between IOTN and AOTC was found to be significant. Moderate agreement on PTC among observers and a low level agreement regarding AOTC were found in the present study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4816587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48165872016-04-13 Judging orthodontic treatment complexity Clijmans, Maïté Medhat, Aly Geest, An De van Gastel, Johannes Kellens, Annelies Fieuws, Steffen Willems, Guy Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate possible relations between anticipated overall treatment complexity (AOTC) of an orthodontic case and malocclusion characteristics. METHODS: Two groups of orthodontists (groups A and B) were asked to define perceived treatment complexity (PTC) of orthodontic cases based on 16 characteristics of malocclusion by means of a questionnaire. Each question was answered on a six-point ordinal scale, with one "not applicable" option (score 0). Group A was also asked to give the AOTC of the specific case on a five-point ordinal scale. The index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) score of the specific cases as well as the malocclusion characteristics were assessed by one author. RESULTS: There is a significant relationship between IOTN and AOTC (p< 0.0001), 22% of variability is explained by differences in IOTN. Adding objective characteristics of malocclusion to explain AOTC does not significantly increase the explained variability (p = 0.086). In judging interobserver agreement, a weighted Kappa of 0.60 for group A and 0.56 for group B was found. The weighted Kappa for agreement in AOTC equals 0.06. CONCLUSION: The relation between IOTN and AOTC was found to be significant. Moderate agreement on PTC among observers and a low level agreement regarding AOTC were found in the present study. Dental Press International 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4816587/ /pubmed/27007763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.060-066.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Articles
Clijmans, Maïté
Medhat, Aly
Geest, An De
van Gastel, Johannes
Kellens, Annelies
Fieuws, Steffen
Willems, Guy
Judging orthodontic treatment complexity
title Judging orthodontic treatment complexity
title_full Judging orthodontic treatment complexity
title_fullStr Judging orthodontic treatment complexity
title_full_unstemmed Judging orthodontic treatment complexity
title_short Judging orthodontic treatment complexity
title_sort judging orthodontic treatment complexity
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27007763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.060-066.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT clijmansmaite judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity
AT medhataly judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity
AT geestande judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity
AT vangasteljohannes judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity
AT kellensannelies judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity
AT fieuwssteffen judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity
AT willemsguy judgingorthodontictreatmentcomplexity