Cargando…
Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?
PURPOSE: Radial scar and radial sclerosis (RS) are considered benign breast lesions with proliferative features. There is sparse literature on frequency of cancer upgrade in these patients without atypical features found on image-guided needle biopsy. This study retrospectively reviews cases of isol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1993-z |
_version_ | 1782424812356894720 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui Hankins, Andrea Cassity, Jamie McDonald, Dennis White, Barbara Rowberry, Ron Dutton, Sharon Snyder, Claire |
author_facet | Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui Hankins, Andrea Cassity, Jamie McDonald, Dennis White, Barbara Rowberry, Ron Dutton, Sharon Snyder, Claire |
author_sort | Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Radial scar and radial sclerosis (RS) are considered benign breast lesions with proliferative features. There is sparse literature on frequency of cancer upgrade in these patients without atypical features found on image-guided needle biopsy. This study retrospectively reviews cases of isolated RS diagnosed on needle biopsy and evaluates the cancer upgrade after subsequent surgical excision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of cases with an isolated RS diagnosis based on needle biopsy and subsequent surgical pathology among all patients between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. Patients with concomitant atypia, lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy, complete excision of very small RS with needle biopsy, and radiology-pathology discordance were excluded. An upgrade from the needle biopsy of RS was defined as surgical excision pathology that revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and/or invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). RESULTS: 10,921 image-guided needle biopsy pathology reports were collected and 88 patients (0.81 %) were identified as having isolated RS. Of these 88 patients, 63 (72 %) underwent excision. The upgrade rate to cancer on subsequent surgical excision was 1.59 % (1/63) for DCIS; 0 % (0/63) for IDC; and 0 % (0/63) ILC. Twenty-five patients who did not undergo surgical excision had stable imaging studies with mean (±SD) 26 (±20) months follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated radial scar on needle biopsy may not warrant routine surgical excision given relatively low cancer upgrade rates. Advancement in breast imaging, pathology and multidisciplinary approaches to care may effectively guide non-surgical management of RS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4816959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48169592016-04-04 Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary? Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui Hankins, Andrea Cassity, Jamie McDonald, Dennis White, Barbara Rowberry, Ron Dutton, Sharon Snyder, Claire Springerplus Research PURPOSE: Radial scar and radial sclerosis (RS) are considered benign breast lesions with proliferative features. There is sparse literature on frequency of cancer upgrade in these patients without atypical features found on image-guided needle biopsy. This study retrospectively reviews cases of isolated RS diagnosed on needle biopsy and evaluates the cancer upgrade after subsequent surgical excision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of cases with an isolated RS diagnosis based on needle biopsy and subsequent surgical pathology among all patients between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. Patients with concomitant atypia, lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy, complete excision of very small RS with needle biopsy, and radiology-pathology discordance were excluded. An upgrade from the needle biopsy of RS was defined as surgical excision pathology that revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and/or invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). RESULTS: 10,921 image-guided needle biopsy pathology reports were collected and 88 patients (0.81 %) were identified as having isolated RS. Of these 88 patients, 63 (72 %) underwent excision. The upgrade rate to cancer on subsequent surgical excision was 1.59 % (1/63) for DCIS; 0 % (0/63) for IDC; and 0 % (0/63) ILC. Twenty-five patients who did not undergo surgical excision had stable imaging studies with mean (±SD) 26 (±20) months follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated radial scar on needle biopsy may not warrant routine surgical excision given relatively low cancer upgrade rates. Advancement in breast imaging, pathology and multidisciplinary approaches to care may effectively guide non-surgical management of RS. Springer International Publishing 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4816959/ /pubmed/27047724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1993-z Text en © Kim et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui Hankins, Andrea Cassity, Jamie McDonald, Dennis White, Barbara Rowberry, Ron Dutton, Sharon Snyder, Claire Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary? |
title | Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary? |
title_full | Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary? |
title_fullStr | Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary? |
title_full_unstemmed | Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary? |
title_short | Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary? |
title_sort | isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: is surgical excision necessary? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1993-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimelizabethminhui isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary AT hankinsandrea isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary AT cassityjamie isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary AT mcdonalddennis isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary AT whitebarbara isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary AT rowberryron isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary AT duttonsharon isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary AT snyderclaire isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary |