Cargando…

Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?

PURPOSE: Radial scar and radial sclerosis (RS) are considered benign breast lesions with proliferative features. There is sparse literature on frequency of cancer upgrade in these patients without atypical features found on image-guided needle biopsy. This study retrospectively reviews cases of isol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui, Hankins, Andrea, Cassity, Jamie, McDonald, Dennis, White, Barbara, Rowberry, Ron, Dutton, Sharon, Snyder, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1993-z
_version_ 1782424812356894720
author Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui
Hankins, Andrea
Cassity, Jamie
McDonald, Dennis
White, Barbara
Rowberry, Ron
Dutton, Sharon
Snyder, Claire
author_facet Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui
Hankins, Andrea
Cassity, Jamie
McDonald, Dennis
White, Barbara
Rowberry, Ron
Dutton, Sharon
Snyder, Claire
author_sort Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Radial scar and radial sclerosis (RS) are considered benign breast lesions with proliferative features. There is sparse literature on frequency of cancer upgrade in these patients without atypical features found on image-guided needle biopsy. This study retrospectively reviews cases of isolated RS diagnosed on needle biopsy and evaluates the cancer upgrade after subsequent surgical excision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of cases with an isolated RS diagnosis based on needle biopsy and subsequent surgical pathology among all patients between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. Patients with concomitant atypia, lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy, complete excision of very small RS with needle biopsy, and radiology-pathology discordance were excluded. An upgrade from the needle biopsy of RS was defined as surgical excision pathology that revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and/or invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). RESULTS: 10,921 image-guided needle biopsy pathology reports were collected and 88 patients (0.81 %) were identified as having isolated RS. Of these 88 patients, 63 (72 %) underwent excision. The upgrade rate to cancer on subsequent surgical excision was 1.59 % (1/63) for DCIS; 0 % (0/63) for IDC; and 0 % (0/63) ILC. Twenty-five patients who did not undergo surgical excision had stable imaging studies with mean (±SD) 26 (±20) months follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated radial scar on needle biopsy may not warrant routine surgical excision given relatively low cancer upgrade rates. Advancement in breast imaging, pathology and multidisciplinary approaches to care may effectively guide non-surgical management of RS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4816959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48169592016-04-04 Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary? Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui Hankins, Andrea Cassity, Jamie McDonald, Dennis White, Barbara Rowberry, Ron Dutton, Sharon Snyder, Claire Springerplus Research PURPOSE: Radial scar and radial sclerosis (RS) are considered benign breast lesions with proliferative features. There is sparse literature on frequency of cancer upgrade in these patients without atypical features found on image-guided needle biopsy. This study retrospectively reviews cases of isolated RS diagnosed on needle biopsy and evaluates the cancer upgrade after subsequent surgical excision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of cases with an isolated RS diagnosis based on needle biopsy and subsequent surgical pathology among all patients between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. Patients with concomitant atypia, lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy, complete excision of very small RS with needle biopsy, and radiology-pathology discordance were excluded. An upgrade from the needle biopsy of RS was defined as surgical excision pathology that revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and/or invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). RESULTS: 10,921 image-guided needle biopsy pathology reports were collected and 88 patients (0.81 %) were identified as having isolated RS. Of these 88 patients, 63 (72 %) underwent excision. The upgrade rate to cancer on subsequent surgical excision was 1.59 % (1/63) for DCIS; 0 % (0/63) for IDC; and 0 % (0/63) ILC. Twenty-five patients who did not undergo surgical excision had stable imaging studies with mean (±SD) 26 (±20) months follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated radial scar on needle biopsy may not warrant routine surgical excision given relatively low cancer upgrade rates. Advancement in breast imaging, pathology and multidisciplinary approaches to care may effectively guide non-surgical management of RS. Springer International Publishing 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4816959/ /pubmed/27047724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1993-z Text en © Kim et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Kim, Elizabeth Min Hui
Hankins, Andrea
Cassity, Jamie
McDonald, Dennis
White, Barbara
Rowberry, Ron
Dutton, Sharon
Snyder, Claire
Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?
title Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?
title_full Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?
title_fullStr Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?
title_short Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?
title_sort isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1993-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kimelizabethminhui isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary
AT hankinsandrea isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary
AT cassityjamie isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary
AT mcdonalddennis isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary
AT whitebarbara isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary
AT rowberryron isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary
AT duttonsharon isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary
AT snyderclaire isolatedradialscardiagnosisbycoreneedlebiopsyissurgicalexcisionnecessary