Cargando…
Irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume?
Irreversible electroporation is a fast-growing liver ablation technique. Although safety has been well documented in small ablations, our aim is to assess its safety and feasibility when a large portion of liver is ablated. Eighty-seven mice were subjected to high voltage pulses directly delivered a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27032535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23781 |
_version_ | 1782424846834073600 |
---|---|
author | Sánchez-Velázquez, P. Castellví, Q. Villanueva, A. Quesada, R. Pañella, C. Cáceres, M. Dorcaratto, D. Andaluz, A. Moll, X. Trujillo, M. Burdío, J. M. Berjano, E. Grande, L. Ivorra, A. Burdío, F. |
author_facet | Sánchez-Velázquez, P. Castellví, Q. Villanueva, A. Quesada, R. Pañella, C. Cáceres, M. Dorcaratto, D. Andaluz, A. Moll, X. Trujillo, M. Burdío, J. M. Berjano, E. Grande, L. Ivorra, A. Burdío, F. |
author_sort | Sánchez-Velázquez, P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Irreversible electroporation is a fast-growing liver ablation technique. Although safety has been well documented in small ablations, our aim is to assess its safety and feasibility when a large portion of liver is ablated. Eighty-seven mice were subjected to high voltage pulses directly delivered across parallel plate electrodes comprising around 40% of mouse liver. One group consisted in 55 athymic-nude, in which a tumor from the KM12C cell line was grown and the other thirty-two C57-Bl6 non-tumoral mice. Both groups were subsequently divided into subsets according to the delivered field strength (1000 V/cm, 2000 V/cm) and whether or not they received anti-hyperkalemia therapy. Early mortality (less than 24 hours post-IRE) in the 2000 V/cm group was observed and revealed considerably higher mean potassium levels. In contrast, the animals subjected to a 2000 V/cm field treated with the anti-hyperkalemia therapy had higher survival rates (OR = 0.1, 95%CI = 0.02–0.32, p < 0.001). Early mortality also depended on the electric field magnitude of the IRE protocol, as mice given 1000 V/cm survived longer than those given 2000 V/cm (OR = 4.7, 95%CI = 1.8–11.8, p = 0.001). Our findings suggest that ionic disturbances, mainly due to potassium alterations, should be warned and envisioned when large volume ablations are performed by IRE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4817133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48171332016-04-05 Irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume? Sánchez-Velázquez, P. Castellví, Q. Villanueva, A. Quesada, R. Pañella, C. Cáceres, M. Dorcaratto, D. Andaluz, A. Moll, X. Trujillo, M. Burdío, J. M. Berjano, E. Grande, L. Ivorra, A. Burdío, F. Sci Rep Article Irreversible electroporation is a fast-growing liver ablation technique. Although safety has been well documented in small ablations, our aim is to assess its safety and feasibility when a large portion of liver is ablated. Eighty-seven mice were subjected to high voltage pulses directly delivered across parallel plate electrodes comprising around 40% of mouse liver. One group consisted in 55 athymic-nude, in which a tumor from the KM12C cell line was grown and the other thirty-two C57-Bl6 non-tumoral mice. Both groups were subsequently divided into subsets according to the delivered field strength (1000 V/cm, 2000 V/cm) and whether or not they received anti-hyperkalemia therapy. Early mortality (less than 24 hours post-IRE) in the 2000 V/cm group was observed and revealed considerably higher mean potassium levels. In contrast, the animals subjected to a 2000 V/cm field treated with the anti-hyperkalemia therapy had higher survival rates (OR = 0.1, 95%CI = 0.02–0.32, p < 0.001). Early mortality also depended on the electric field magnitude of the IRE protocol, as mice given 1000 V/cm survived longer than those given 2000 V/cm (OR = 4.7, 95%CI = 1.8–11.8, p = 0.001). Our findings suggest that ionic disturbances, mainly due to potassium alterations, should be warned and envisioned when large volume ablations are performed by IRE. Nature Publishing Group 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4817133/ /pubmed/27032535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23781 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Sánchez-Velázquez, P. Castellví, Q. Villanueva, A. Quesada, R. Pañella, C. Cáceres, M. Dorcaratto, D. Andaluz, A. Moll, X. Trujillo, M. Burdío, J. M. Berjano, E. Grande, L. Ivorra, A. Burdío, F. Irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume? |
title | Irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume? |
title_full | Irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume? |
title_fullStr | Irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume? |
title_full_unstemmed | Irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume? |
title_short | Irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume? |
title_sort | irreversible electroporation of the liver: is there a safe limit to the ablation volume? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27032535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezvelazquezp irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT castellviq irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT villanuevaa irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT quesadar irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT panellac irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT caceresm irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT dorcarattod irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT andaluza irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT mollx irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT trujillom irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT burdiojm irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT berjanoe irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT grandel irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT ivorraa irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume AT burdiof irreversibleelectroporationoftheliveristhereasafelimittotheablationvolume |