Cargando…

Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil

This study demonstrated the highly efficient degradation of n-hexadecane in soil, realized by alternating bioremediation and electrokinetic technologies. Using an alternating technology instead of simultaneous application prevented competition between the processes that would lower their efficiency....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Sa, Guo, Shuhai, Li, Fengmei, Yang, Xuelian, Teng, Fei, Wang, Jianing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27032838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23833
_version_ 1782424856923471872
author Wang, Sa
Guo, Shuhai
Li, Fengmei
Yang, Xuelian
Teng, Fei
Wang, Jianing
author_facet Wang, Sa
Guo, Shuhai
Li, Fengmei
Yang, Xuelian
Teng, Fei
Wang, Jianing
author_sort Wang, Sa
collection PubMed
description This study demonstrated the highly efficient degradation of n-hexadecane in soil, realized by alternating bioremediation and electrokinetic technologies. Using an alternating technology instead of simultaneous application prevented competition between the processes that would lower their efficiency. For the consumption of the soil dissolved organic matter (DOM) necessary for bioremediation by electrokinetics, bioremediation was performed first. Because of the utilization and loss of the DOM and water-soluble ions by the microbial and electrokinetic processes, respectively, both of them were supplemented to provide a basic carbon resource, maintain a high electrical conductivity and produce a uniform distribution of ions. The moisture and bacteria were also supplemented. The optimal DOM supplement (20.5 mg·kg(−1) glucose; 80–90% of the total natural DOM content in the soil) was calculated to avoid competitive effects (between the DOM and n-hexadecane) and to prevent nutritional deficiency. The replenishment of the water-soluble ions maintained their content equal to their initial concentrations. The degradation rate of n-hexadecane was only 167.0 mg·kg(−1)·d(−1) (1.9%, w/w) for the first 9 days in the treatments with bioremediation or electrokinetics alone, but this rate was realized throughout the whole process when the two technologies were alternated, with a degradation of 78.5% ± 2.0% for the n-hexadecane after 45 days of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4817206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48172062016-04-05 Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil Wang, Sa Guo, Shuhai Li, Fengmei Yang, Xuelian Teng, Fei Wang, Jianing Sci Rep Article This study demonstrated the highly efficient degradation of n-hexadecane in soil, realized by alternating bioremediation and electrokinetic technologies. Using an alternating technology instead of simultaneous application prevented competition between the processes that would lower their efficiency. For the consumption of the soil dissolved organic matter (DOM) necessary for bioremediation by electrokinetics, bioremediation was performed first. Because of the utilization and loss of the DOM and water-soluble ions by the microbial and electrokinetic processes, respectively, both of them were supplemented to provide a basic carbon resource, maintain a high electrical conductivity and produce a uniform distribution of ions. The moisture and bacteria were also supplemented. The optimal DOM supplement (20.5 mg·kg(−1) glucose; 80–90% of the total natural DOM content in the soil) was calculated to avoid competitive effects (between the DOM and n-hexadecane) and to prevent nutritional deficiency. The replenishment of the water-soluble ions maintained their content equal to their initial concentrations. The degradation rate of n-hexadecane was only 167.0 mg·kg(−1)·d(−1) (1.9%, w/w) for the first 9 days in the treatments with bioremediation or electrokinetics alone, but this rate was realized throughout the whole process when the two technologies were alternated, with a degradation of 78.5% ± 2.0% for the n-hexadecane after 45 days of treatment. Nature Publishing Group 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4817206/ /pubmed/27032838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23833 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Sa
Guo, Shuhai
Li, Fengmei
Yang, Xuelian
Teng, Fei
Wang, Jianing
Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil
title Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil
title_full Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil
title_fullStr Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil
title_full_unstemmed Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil
title_short Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil
title_sort effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27032838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep23833
work_keys_str_mv AT wangsa effectofalternatingbioremediationandelectrokineticsontheremediationofnhexadecanecontaminatedsoil
AT guoshuhai effectofalternatingbioremediationandelectrokineticsontheremediationofnhexadecanecontaminatedsoil
AT lifengmei effectofalternatingbioremediationandelectrokineticsontheremediationofnhexadecanecontaminatedsoil
AT yangxuelian effectofalternatingbioremediationandelectrokineticsontheremediationofnhexadecanecontaminatedsoil
AT tengfei effectofalternatingbioremediationandelectrokineticsontheremediationofnhexadecanecontaminatedsoil
AT wangjianing effectofalternatingbioremediationandelectrokineticsontheremediationofnhexadecanecontaminatedsoil