Cargando…
Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983
Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 states that an approved clinician can provide medical treatment irrespective of whether or not a detained patient has capacity to refuse such treatment. Case law has established that a range of acts ancillary to the core mental disorder treatment are allowed...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Psychiatrists
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.050492 |
_version_ | 1782424921366855680 |
---|---|
author | Curtice, Martin James, Louisa |
author_facet | Curtice, Martin James, Louisa |
author_sort | Curtice, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 states that an approved clinician can provide medical treatment irrespective of whether or not a detained patient has capacity to refuse such treatment. Case law has established that a range of acts ancillary to the core mental disorder treatment are allowed under Section 63. This article analyses a unique court judgment involving a detained Jehovah's Witness patient who had made an advance decision refusing blood transfusions but who self-inflicted lacerations resulting in blood loss. Core issues within the case involved capacity to consent to treatment and the ethics of treating or not treating patients in such cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4817650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Royal College of Psychiatrists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48176502016-04-15 Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 Curtice, Martin James, Louisa BJPsych Bull Special Articles Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 states that an approved clinician can provide medical treatment irrespective of whether or not a detained patient has capacity to refuse such treatment. Case law has established that a range of acts ancillary to the core mental disorder treatment are allowed under Section 63. This article analyses a unique court judgment involving a detained Jehovah's Witness patient who had made an advance decision refusing blood transfusions but who self-inflicted lacerations resulting in blood loss. Core issues within the case involved capacity to consent to treatment and the ethics of treating or not treating patients in such cases. Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4817650/ /pubmed/27087990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.050492 Text en © 2016 Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Articles Curtice, Martin James, Louisa Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 |
title | Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 |
title_full | Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 |
title_fullStr | Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 |
title_full_unstemmed | Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 |
title_short | Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 |
title_sort | faith, ethics and section 63 of the mental health act 1983 |
topic | Special Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.050492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT curticemartin faithethicsandsection63ofthementalhealthact1983 AT jameslouisa faithethicsandsection63ofthementalhealthact1983 |