Cargando…

Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983

Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 states that an approved clinician can provide medical treatment irrespective of whether or not a detained patient has capacity to refuse such treatment. Case law has established that a range of acts ancillary to the core mental disorder treatment are allowed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curtice, Martin, James, Louisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.050492
_version_ 1782424921366855680
author Curtice, Martin
James, Louisa
author_facet Curtice, Martin
James, Louisa
author_sort Curtice, Martin
collection PubMed
description Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 states that an approved clinician can provide medical treatment irrespective of whether or not a detained patient has capacity to refuse such treatment. Case law has established that a range of acts ancillary to the core mental disorder treatment are allowed under Section 63. This article analyses a unique court judgment involving a detained Jehovah's Witness patient who had made an advance decision refusing blood transfusions but who self-inflicted lacerations resulting in blood loss. Core issues within the case involved capacity to consent to treatment and the ethics of treating or not treating patients in such cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4817650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal College of Psychiatrists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48176502016-04-15 Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 Curtice, Martin James, Louisa BJPsych Bull Special Articles Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 states that an approved clinician can provide medical treatment irrespective of whether or not a detained patient has capacity to refuse such treatment. Case law has established that a range of acts ancillary to the core mental disorder treatment are allowed under Section 63. This article analyses a unique court judgment involving a detained Jehovah's Witness patient who had made an advance decision refusing blood transfusions but who self-inflicted lacerations resulting in blood loss. Core issues within the case involved capacity to consent to treatment and the ethics of treating or not treating patients in such cases. Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4817650/ /pubmed/27087990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.050492 Text en © 2016 Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Articles
Curtice, Martin
James, Louisa
Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983
title Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983
title_full Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983
title_fullStr Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983
title_full_unstemmed Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983
title_short Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983
title_sort faith, ethics and section 63 of the mental health act 1983
topic Special Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.050492
work_keys_str_mv AT curticemartin faithethicsandsection63ofthementalhealthact1983
AT jameslouisa faithethicsandsection63ofthementalhealthact1983