Cargando…

X-inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile X premutation carrier sisters

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe a case series of 4 sisters with discordant clinical phenotypes associated with fragile X–associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) that may be explained by varying CGG repeat sizes and activation ratios (ARs) (the ratio of cells carrying the normal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Deborah A., Robertson-Dick, Erin E., O'Keefe, Joan A., Hadd, Andrew G., Zhou, Lili, Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000045
_version_ 1782424936521924608
author Hall, Deborah A.
Robertson-Dick, Erin E.
O'Keefe, Joan A.
Hadd, Andrew G.
Zhou, Lili
Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
author_facet Hall, Deborah A.
Robertson-Dick, Erin E.
O'Keefe, Joan A.
Hadd, Andrew G.
Zhou, Lili
Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
author_sort Hall, Deborah A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe a case series of 4 sisters with discordant clinical phenotypes associated with fragile X–associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) that may be explained by varying CGG repeat sizes and activation ratios (ARs) (the ratio of cells carrying the normal fragile X mental retardation 1 [FMR1] allele on the active X chromosome). METHODS: Four sisters with premutation size FMR1 gene repeats underwent detailed clinical characterization. CGG repeat length was determined by PCR, and AR was determined using a newly developed commercial methylation PCR assay and was compared with the results from Southern blot with densitometric image analysis. RESULTS: Sister 1 had the largest CGG expansion (82) and the lowest AR (12%), with the most severe clinical presentation. Sister 2 had a lower CGG expansion (70) and an AR of 10% but had a milder clinical presentation.Sister 3 had a similar CGG expansion (79) but a slightly higher AR of 15% and less neurologic involvement. Sister 4 had a similar CGG expansion size of 80 but had the largest AR (40%) and was the only sister not to be affected by FXTAS or have any neurologic signs on examination. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that premutation carrier women who have higher ARs may be less likely to show manifestations of FXTAS. If larger studies show similar patterns, AR data could potentially be beneficial to supplement CGG repeat size when counseling premutation carrier women in the clinic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4817899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48178992016-04-08 X-inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile X premutation carrier sisters Hall, Deborah A. Robertson-Dick, Erin E. O'Keefe, Joan A. Hadd, Andrew G. Zhou, Lili Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Neurol Genet Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe a case series of 4 sisters with discordant clinical phenotypes associated with fragile X–associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) that may be explained by varying CGG repeat sizes and activation ratios (ARs) (the ratio of cells carrying the normal fragile X mental retardation 1 [FMR1] allele on the active X chromosome). METHODS: Four sisters with premutation size FMR1 gene repeats underwent detailed clinical characterization. CGG repeat length was determined by PCR, and AR was determined using a newly developed commercial methylation PCR assay and was compared with the results from Southern blot with densitometric image analysis. RESULTS: Sister 1 had the largest CGG expansion (82) and the lowest AR (12%), with the most severe clinical presentation. Sister 2 had a lower CGG expansion (70) and an AR of 10% but had a milder clinical presentation.Sister 3 had a similar CGG expansion (79) but a slightly higher AR of 15% and less neurologic involvement. Sister 4 had a similar CGG expansion size of 80 but had the largest AR (40%) and was the only sister not to be affected by FXTAS or have any neurologic signs on examination. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that premutation carrier women who have higher ARs may be less likely to show manifestations of FXTAS. If larger studies show similar patterns, AR data could potentially be beneficial to supplement CGG repeat size when counseling premutation carrier women in the clinic. Wolters Kluwer 2016-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4817899/ /pubmed/27066582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000045 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Article
Hall, Deborah A.
Robertson-Dick, Erin E.
O'Keefe, Joan A.
Hadd, Andrew G.
Zhou, Lili
Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
X-inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile X premutation carrier sisters
title X-inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile X premutation carrier sisters
title_full X-inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile X premutation carrier sisters
title_fullStr X-inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile X premutation carrier sisters
title_full_unstemmed X-inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile X premutation carrier sisters
title_short X-inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile X premutation carrier sisters
title_sort x-inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile x premutation carrier sisters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000045
work_keys_str_mv AT halldeboraha xinactivationintheclinicalphenotypeoffragilexpremutationcarriersisters
AT robertsondickerine xinactivationintheclinicalphenotypeoffragilexpremutationcarriersisters
AT okeefejoana xinactivationintheclinicalphenotypeoffragilexpremutationcarriersisters
AT haddandrewg xinactivationintheclinicalphenotypeoffragilexpremutationcarriersisters
AT zhoulili xinactivationintheclinicalphenotypeoffragilexpremutationcarriersisters
AT berrykraviselizabeth xinactivationintheclinicalphenotypeoffragilexpremutationcarriersisters