Cargando…

Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators

INTRODUCTION: Under the Next Accreditation System, programs need to find ways to collect and assess meaningful reportable information on its residents to assist the program director regarding resident milestone progression. This paper discusses the process that one large Internal Medicine Residency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friedman, Karen A., Raimo, John, Spielmann, Kelly, Chaudhry, Saima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27037226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.29838
_version_ 1782425008941826048
author Friedman, Karen A.
Raimo, John
Spielmann, Kelly
Chaudhry, Saima
author_facet Friedman, Karen A.
Raimo, John
Spielmann, Kelly
Chaudhry, Saima
author_sort Friedman, Karen A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Under the Next Accreditation System, programs need to find ways to collect and assess meaningful reportable information on its residents to assist the program director regarding resident milestone progression. This paper discusses the process that one large Internal Medicine Residency Program used to provide both quantitative and qualitative data to its clinical competency committee (CCC) through the creation of a resident dashboard. METHODS: Program leadership at a large university-based program developed four new end of rotation evaluations based on the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) and Accreditation Council of Graduated Medical Education's (ACGME) 22 reportable milestones. A resident dashboard was then created to pull together both milestone- and non-milestone-based quantitative data and qualitative data compiled from faculty, nurses, peers, staff, and patients. RESULTS: Dashboards were distributed to the members of the CCC in preparation for the semiannual CCC meeting. CCC members adjudicated quantitative and qualitative data to present their cohort of residents at the CCC meeting. Based on the committee's response, evaluation scores remained the same or were adjusted. Final milestone scores were then entered into the accreditation data system (ADS) on the ACGME website. CONCLUSIONS: The process of resident assessment is complex and should comprise both quantitative and qualitative data. The dashboard is a valuable tool for program leadership to use both when evaluating house staff on a semiannual basis at the CCC and to the resident in person.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4818357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48183572016-04-22 Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators Friedman, Karen A. Raimo, John Spielmann, Kelly Chaudhry, Saima Med Educ Online Trend Article INTRODUCTION: Under the Next Accreditation System, programs need to find ways to collect and assess meaningful reportable information on its residents to assist the program director regarding resident milestone progression. This paper discusses the process that one large Internal Medicine Residency Program used to provide both quantitative and qualitative data to its clinical competency committee (CCC) through the creation of a resident dashboard. METHODS: Program leadership at a large university-based program developed four new end of rotation evaluations based on the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) and Accreditation Council of Graduated Medical Education's (ACGME) 22 reportable milestones. A resident dashboard was then created to pull together both milestone- and non-milestone-based quantitative data and qualitative data compiled from faculty, nurses, peers, staff, and patients. RESULTS: Dashboards were distributed to the members of the CCC in preparation for the semiannual CCC meeting. CCC members adjudicated quantitative and qualitative data to present their cohort of residents at the CCC meeting. Based on the committee's response, evaluation scores remained the same or were adjusted. Final milestone scores were then entered into the accreditation data system (ADS) on the ACGME website. CONCLUSIONS: The process of resident assessment is complex and should comprise both quantitative and qualitative data. The dashboard is a valuable tool for program leadership to use both when evaluating house staff on a semiannual basis at the CCC and to the resident in person. Co-Action Publishing 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4818357/ /pubmed/27037226 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.29838 Text en © 2016 Karen A. Friedman et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Trend Article
Friedman, Karen A.
Raimo, John
Spielmann, Kelly
Chaudhry, Saima
Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators
title Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators
title_full Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators
title_fullStr Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators
title_full_unstemmed Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators
title_short Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators
title_sort resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees’ key performance indicators
topic Trend Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27037226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.29838
work_keys_str_mv AT friedmankarena residentdashboardshelpingyourclinicalcompetencycommitteevisualizetraineeskeyperformanceindicators
AT raimojohn residentdashboardshelpingyourclinicalcompetencycommitteevisualizetraineeskeyperformanceindicators
AT spielmannkelly residentdashboardshelpingyourclinicalcompetencycommitteevisualizetraineeskeyperformanceindicators
AT chaudhrysaima residentdashboardshelpingyourclinicalcompetencycommitteevisualizetraineeskeyperformanceindicators