Cargando…
The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings
BACKGROUND: Due to antibiotic treatment of humans and animals, the prevalence of bacterial resistances increases worldwide. Especially in livestock farming, large quantities of faeces contaminated with antibiotics pose a risk of the carryover of the active ingredient to the environment. Accordingly,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0688-6 |
_version_ | 1782425024650543104 |
---|---|
author | Stahl, Jessica Zessel, Katrin Schulz, Jochen Finke, Jan Henrik Müller-Goymann, Christel Charlotte Kietzmann, Manfred |
author_facet | Stahl, Jessica Zessel, Katrin Schulz, Jochen Finke, Jan Henrik Müller-Goymann, Christel Charlotte Kietzmann, Manfred |
author_sort | Stahl, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Due to antibiotic treatment of humans and animals, the prevalence of bacterial resistances increases worldwide. Especially in livestock farming, large quantities of faeces contaminated with antibiotics pose a risk of the carryover of the active ingredient to the environment. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was the evaluation of the benefit of different oral dosage forms (powder, pellets, granula) in pigs concerning the environmental pollution of sulfadiazine. Two subtherapeutic dosages were evaluated in powder mixtures to gain information about their potential to pollute the pig barn. Furthermore, a new group of pigs was kept in the stable after powder feeding of another pig group to determine the possible absorption of environmentally distributed antibiotics. Pigs were orally treated with three dosage forms. Simultaneously, sedimentation and airborne dust were collected and plasma and urine levels were determined. RESULTS: All formulations result in comparable plasma and urine levels, but massive differences in environmental pollution (powder > pellets, granula). Pigs housing in a contaminated barn exhibit traces of sulfadiazine in plasma and urine. CONCLUSION: Using pharmaceutical formulations like pellets or granula, the environmental pollution of sulfonamides can significantly be diminished due to massive dust reduction during feeding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4818411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48184112016-04-03 The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings Stahl, Jessica Zessel, Katrin Schulz, Jochen Finke, Jan Henrik Müller-Goymann, Christel Charlotte Kietzmann, Manfred BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to antibiotic treatment of humans and animals, the prevalence of bacterial resistances increases worldwide. Especially in livestock farming, large quantities of faeces contaminated with antibiotics pose a risk of the carryover of the active ingredient to the environment. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was the evaluation of the benefit of different oral dosage forms (powder, pellets, granula) in pigs concerning the environmental pollution of sulfadiazine. Two subtherapeutic dosages were evaluated in powder mixtures to gain information about their potential to pollute the pig barn. Furthermore, a new group of pigs was kept in the stable after powder feeding of another pig group to determine the possible absorption of environmentally distributed antibiotics. Pigs were orally treated with three dosage forms. Simultaneously, sedimentation and airborne dust were collected and plasma and urine levels were determined. RESULTS: All formulations result in comparable plasma and urine levels, but massive differences in environmental pollution (powder > pellets, granula). Pigs housing in a contaminated barn exhibit traces of sulfadiazine in plasma and urine. CONCLUSION: Using pharmaceutical formulations like pellets or granula, the environmental pollution of sulfonamides can significantly be diminished due to massive dust reduction during feeding. BioMed Central 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4818411/ /pubmed/27036103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0688-6 Text en © Stahl et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stahl, Jessica Zessel, Katrin Schulz, Jochen Finke, Jan Henrik Müller-Goymann, Christel Charlotte Kietzmann, Manfred The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings |
title | The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings |
title_full | The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings |
title_fullStr | The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings |
title_short | The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings |
title_sort | effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0688-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stahljessica theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT zesselkatrin theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT schulzjochen theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT finkejanhenrik theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT mullergoymannchristelcharlotte theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT kietzmannmanfred theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT stahljessica effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT zesselkatrin effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT schulzjochen effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT finkejanhenrik effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT mullergoymannchristelcharlotte effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings AT kietzmannmanfred effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings |