Cargando…

The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings

BACKGROUND: Due to antibiotic treatment of humans and animals, the prevalence of bacterial resistances increases worldwide. Especially in livestock farming, large quantities of faeces contaminated with antibiotics pose a risk of the carryover of the active ingredient to the environment. Accordingly,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stahl, Jessica, Zessel, Katrin, Schulz, Jochen, Finke, Jan Henrik, Müller-Goymann, Christel Charlotte, Kietzmann, Manfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0688-6
_version_ 1782425024650543104
author Stahl, Jessica
Zessel, Katrin
Schulz, Jochen
Finke, Jan Henrik
Müller-Goymann, Christel Charlotte
Kietzmann, Manfred
author_facet Stahl, Jessica
Zessel, Katrin
Schulz, Jochen
Finke, Jan Henrik
Müller-Goymann, Christel Charlotte
Kietzmann, Manfred
author_sort Stahl, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to antibiotic treatment of humans and animals, the prevalence of bacterial resistances increases worldwide. Especially in livestock farming, large quantities of faeces contaminated with antibiotics pose a risk of the carryover of the active ingredient to the environment. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was the evaluation of the benefit of different oral dosage forms (powder, pellets, granula) in pigs concerning the environmental pollution of sulfadiazine. Two subtherapeutic dosages were evaluated in powder mixtures to gain information about their potential to pollute the pig barn. Furthermore, a new group of pigs was kept in the stable after powder feeding of another pig group to determine the possible absorption of environmentally distributed antibiotics. Pigs were orally treated with three dosage forms. Simultaneously, sedimentation and airborne dust were collected and plasma and urine levels were determined. RESULTS: All formulations result in comparable plasma and urine levels, but massive differences in environmental pollution (powder > pellets, granula). Pigs housing in a contaminated barn exhibit traces of sulfadiazine in plasma and urine. CONCLUSION: Using pharmaceutical formulations like pellets or granula, the environmental pollution of sulfonamides can significantly be diminished due to massive dust reduction during feeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4818411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48184112016-04-03 The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings Stahl, Jessica Zessel, Katrin Schulz, Jochen Finke, Jan Henrik Müller-Goymann, Christel Charlotte Kietzmann, Manfred BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to antibiotic treatment of humans and animals, the prevalence of bacterial resistances increases worldwide. Especially in livestock farming, large quantities of faeces contaminated with antibiotics pose a risk of the carryover of the active ingredient to the environment. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was the evaluation of the benefit of different oral dosage forms (powder, pellets, granula) in pigs concerning the environmental pollution of sulfadiazine. Two subtherapeutic dosages were evaluated in powder mixtures to gain information about their potential to pollute the pig barn. Furthermore, a new group of pigs was kept in the stable after powder feeding of another pig group to determine the possible absorption of environmentally distributed antibiotics. Pigs were orally treated with three dosage forms. Simultaneously, sedimentation and airborne dust were collected and plasma and urine levels were determined. RESULTS: All formulations result in comparable plasma and urine levels, but massive differences in environmental pollution (powder > pellets, granula). Pigs housing in a contaminated barn exhibit traces of sulfadiazine in plasma and urine. CONCLUSION: Using pharmaceutical formulations like pellets or granula, the environmental pollution of sulfonamides can significantly be diminished due to massive dust reduction during feeding. BioMed Central 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4818411/ /pubmed/27036103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0688-6 Text en © Stahl et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stahl, Jessica
Zessel, Katrin
Schulz, Jochen
Finke, Jan Henrik
Müller-Goymann, Christel Charlotte
Kietzmann, Manfred
The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings
title The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings
title_full The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings
title_fullStr The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings
title_full_unstemmed The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings
title_short The effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings
title_sort effect of miscellaneous oral dosage forms on the environmental pollution of sulfonamides in pig holdings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0688-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stahljessica theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT zesselkatrin theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT schulzjochen theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT finkejanhenrik theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT mullergoymannchristelcharlotte theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT kietzmannmanfred theeffectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT stahljessica effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT zesselkatrin effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT schulzjochen effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT finkejanhenrik effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT mullergoymannchristelcharlotte effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings
AT kietzmannmanfred effectofmiscellaneousoraldosageformsontheenvironmentalpollutionofsulfonamidesinpigholdings