Cargando…

What is the effect of sensory discrimination training on chronic low back pain? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Sensory discrimination training (SDT) for people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a novel approach based on theories of the cortical reorganization of the neural system. SDT aims to reverse cortical reorganization, which is observed in chronic pain patients. SDT is still a developing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kälin, Samuel, Rausch-Osthoff, Anne-Kathrin, Bauer, Christoph Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27038609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0997-8
_version_ 1782425112319885312
author Kälin, Samuel
Rausch-Osthoff, Anne-Kathrin
Bauer, Christoph Michael
author_facet Kälin, Samuel
Rausch-Osthoff, Anne-Kathrin
Bauer, Christoph Michael
author_sort Kälin, Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sensory discrimination training (SDT) for people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a novel approach based on theories of the cortical reorganization of the neural system. SDT aims to reverse cortical reorganization, which is observed in chronic pain patients. SDT is still a developing therapeutic approach and its effects have not been systematically reviewed. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate if SDT decreases pain and improves function in people with CLBP. METHODS: A systematic review was performed on the available literature to evaluate the effects of SDT. Randomised controlled trials compared the effectiveness of SDT on pain and function in people with CLBP with the effectiveness of other physiotherapy interventions, no treatment, or sham therapy. The methodological quality of the included studies and the clinical relevance of reported treatment effects were investigated. RESULTS: The original search revealed 42 records of which 6 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies showed that SDT caused statistically significant improvements in pain and function, but only two studies reported clinically relevant improvements. The applied SDT varied considerably with regard to dosage and content. The methodological quality of the included studies also varied, which hampered the comparability of results. CONCLUSIONS: Although SDT seems to improve pain and function in people with CLBP, study limitations render firm conclusions unsafe. Future studies should pay closer attention to power and sample selection as well as to the content and dosage of the SDT intervention. We recommend a large, well-powered, prospective randomized control study that uses a standardized SDT approach to address the hypothesis that SDT causes clinically relevant improvements in pain and function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-0997-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4818915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48189152016-04-04 What is the effect of sensory discrimination training on chronic low back pain? A systematic review Kälin, Samuel Rausch-Osthoff, Anne-Kathrin Bauer, Christoph Michael BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Sensory discrimination training (SDT) for people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a novel approach based on theories of the cortical reorganization of the neural system. SDT aims to reverse cortical reorganization, which is observed in chronic pain patients. SDT is still a developing therapeutic approach and its effects have not been systematically reviewed. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate if SDT decreases pain and improves function in people with CLBP. METHODS: A systematic review was performed on the available literature to evaluate the effects of SDT. Randomised controlled trials compared the effectiveness of SDT on pain and function in people with CLBP with the effectiveness of other physiotherapy interventions, no treatment, or sham therapy. The methodological quality of the included studies and the clinical relevance of reported treatment effects were investigated. RESULTS: The original search revealed 42 records of which 6 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies showed that SDT caused statistically significant improvements in pain and function, but only two studies reported clinically relevant improvements. The applied SDT varied considerably with regard to dosage and content. The methodological quality of the included studies also varied, which hampered the comparability of results. CONCLUSIONS: Although SDT seems to improve pain and function in people with CLBP, study limitations render firm conclusions unsafe. Future studies should pay closer attention to power and sample selection as well as to the content and dosage of the SDT intervention. We recommend a large, well-powered, prospective randomized control study that uses a standardized SDT approach to address the hypothesis that SDT causes clinically relevant improvements in pain and function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-0997-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4818915/ /pubmed/27038609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0997-8 Text en © Kälin et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kälin, Samuel
Rausch-Osthoff, Anne-Kathrin
Bauer, Christoph Michael
What is the effect of sensory discrimination training on chronic low back pain? A systematic review
title What is the effect of sensory discrimination training on chronic low back pain? A systematic review
title_full What is the effect of sensory discrimination training on chronic low back pain? A systematic review
title_fullStr What is the effect of sensory discrimination training on chronic low back pain? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed What is the effect of sensory discrimination training on chronic low back pain? A systematic review
title_short What is the effect of sensory discrimination training on chronic low back pain? A systematic review
title_sort what is the effect of sensory discrimination training on chronic low back pain? a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27038609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0997-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kalinsamuel whatistheeffectofsensorydiscriminationtrainingonchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview
AT rauschosthoffannekathrin whatistheeffectofsensorydiscriminationtrainingonchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview
AT bauerchristophmichael whatistheeffectofsensorydiscriminationtrainingonchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview