Cargando…

Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings

BACKGROUND: Trials in primary care to increase physical activity (PA) typically experience poor recruitment rates and may not recruit those with lower PA levels and who are most in need of the intervention. Despite the well-publicised benefits of physical activity, the majority of adults in the UK r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Normansell, Rebecca, Holmes, Rebecca, Victor, Christina, Cook, Derek G, Kerry, Sally, Iliffe, Steve, Ussher, Michael, Fox-Rushby, Julia, Whincup, Peter, Harris, Tess
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27039181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1299-z
_version_ 1782425121414184960
author Normansell, Rebecca
Holmes, Rebecca
Victor, Christina
Cook, Derek G
Kerry, Sally
Iliffe, Steve
Ussher, Michael
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Whincup, Peter
Harris, Tess
author_facet Normansell, Rebecca
Holmes, Rebecca
Victor, Christina
Cook, Derek G
Kerry, Sally
Iliffe, Steve
Ussher, Michael
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Whincup, Peter
Harris, Tess
author_sort Normansell, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Trials in primary care to increase physical activity (PA) typically experience poor recruitment rates and may not recruit those with lower PA levels and who are most in need of the intervention. Despite the well-publicised benefits of physical activity, the majority of adults in the UK remain inactive and, therefore, at greater risk of many health problems. Our aim was to investigate the reasons for non-participation in the PACE-UP trial, which is a primary care pedometer-based walking intervention. This is important for successful recruitment and retention in future PA trials and programmes. METHOD: We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded telephone interviews with 30 participants, aged 45–75 years, purposively sampled from those declining participation in the PACE-UP trial. Recruitment continued until data saturation and a demographically balanced sample was achieved. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded and subjected to thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interviewees supported walking as suitable exercise for most people in this age group, recognised the importance of this type of research and general practice as an appropriate setting. Key reasons for declining were: the perception of being already ‘too active’; existing medical conditions; work; travel and other commitments. Less frequently cited reasons included reluctance to be randomised, the intervention’s duration, wearing a pedometer, perceived inappropriateness of trial literature and a preference for a different kind of PA or for a group activity. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst most interviewees perceived themselves to be sufficiently active, an important minority did not participate due to existing medical conditions and other commitments. Recruitment to future PA trials might be improved by tailoring activity to compensate for medical problems, and adapting PA interventions to fit around work and travel commitments. Ensuring that patient-targeted literature is succinct and inclusive and that equipment is user-friendly are also important. Primary care is seen as an appropriate setting for PA trials and programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN98538934.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4818945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48189452016-04-04 Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings Normansell, Rebecca Holmes, Rebecca Victor, Christina Cook, Derek G Kerry, Sally Iliffe, Steve Ussher, Michael Fox-Rushby, Julia Whincup, Peter Harris, Tess Trials Research BACKGROUND: Trials in primary care to increase physical activity (PA) typically experience poor recruitment rates and may not recruit those with lower PA levels and who are most in need of the intervention. Despite the well-publicised benefits of physical activity, the majority of adults in the UK remain inactive and, therefore, at greater risk of many health problems. Our aim was to investigate the reasons for non-participation in the PACE-UP trial, which is a primary care pedometer-based walking intervention. This is important for successful recruitment and retention in future PA trials and programmes. METHOD: We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded telephone interviews with 30 participants, aged 45–75 years, purposively sampled from those declining participation in the PACE-UP trial. Recruitment continued until data saturation and a demographically balanced sample was achieved. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded and subjected to thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interviewees supported walking as suitable exercise for most people in this age group, recognised the importance of this type of research and general practice as an appropriate setting. Key reasons for declining were: the perception of being already ‘too active’; existing medical conditions; work; travel and other commitments. Less frequently cited reasons included reluctance to be randomised, the intervention’s duration, wearing a pedometer, perceived inappropriateness of trial literature and a preference for a different kind of PA or for a group activity. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst most interviewees perceived themselves to be sufficiently active, an important minority did not participate due to existing medical conditions and other commitments. Recruitment to future PA trials might be improved by tailoring activity to compensate for medical problems, and adapting PA interventions to fit around work and travel commitments. Ensuring that patient-targeted literature is succinct and inclusive and that equipment is user-friendly are also important. Primary care is seen as an appropriate setting for PA trials and programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN98538934. BioMed Central 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4818945/ /pubmed/27039181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1299-z Text en © Normansell et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Normansell, Rebecca
Holmes, Rebecca
Victor, Christina
Cook, Derek G
Kerry, Sally
Iliffe, Steve
Ussher, Michael
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Whincup, Peter
Harris, Tess
Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings
title Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings
title_full Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings
title_fullStr Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings
title_full_unstemmed Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings
title_short Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings
title_sort exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: pace-up trial interview findings
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27039181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1299-z
work_keys_str_mv AT normansellrebecca exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings
AT holmesrebecca exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings
AT victorchristina exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings
AT cookderekg exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings
AT kerrysally exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings
AT iliffesteve exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings
AT usshermichael exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings
AT foxrushbyjulia exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings
AT whincuppeter exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings
AT harristess exploringnonparticipationinprimarycarephysicalactivityinterventionspaceuptrialinterviewfindings