Cargando…

Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach

BACKGROUND: The advent of Internet and World Wide Web has created new perspectives toward interaction between patients and healthcare professionals. Telemonitoring patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an emerging concept to guide the collaborative management treatment and improve outcomes in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salaffi, Fausto, Carotti, Marina, Ciapetti, Alessandro, Di Carlo, Marco, Gasparini, Stefania, Farah, Sonia, Gutierrez, Marwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27038788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1002-2
_version_ 1782425123800743936
author Salaffi, Fausto
Carotti, Marina
Ciapetti, Alessandro
Di Carlo, Marco
Gasparini, Stefania
Farah, Sonia
Gutierrez, Marwin
author_facet Salaffi, Fausto
Carotti, Marina
Ciapetti, Alessandro
Di Carlo, Marco
Gasparini, Stefania
Farah, Sonia
Gutierrez, Marwin
author_sort Salaffi, Fausto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The advent of Internet and World Wide Web has created new perspectives toward interaction between patients and healthcare professionals. Telemonitoring patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an emerging concept to guide the collaborative management treatment and improve outcomes in patients. The objective of this study was to investigate whether an intensive treatment strategy, according to a telemonitoring protocol, is more effective than conventional management strategy in reaching remission and comprehensive disease control (CDC) after 1 year in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients. METHODS: Forty-four ERA patients were randomly allocated into two groups: the telemonitoring intensive strategy (TIS) group (group 1) or the conventional strategy (CS) group (group 2). Three patients refused to participate. In group 1 (n = 21), a remote monitoring system of disease activity, in combination with protocolised treatment adjustments aiming for remission was applied. In group 2 (n = 20), patients were treated according to daily clinical practice, with regular evaluation of disease activity, but without protocolised treatment adjustments. A telemedical care called “REmote TElemonitoring for MAnaging Rheumatologic Condition and HEaltcare programmes” (RETE-MARCHE), was developed to perform the remote monitoring. RESULTS: A higher percentage of patients in the TIS group achieved CDAI remission vs patients in the CS group (38.1 % vs 25 % at year 1, p <0.01). Time to achieve remission was significantly shorter in the group 1 than in the group 2, with a median of 20 weeks vs a median over 36-weeks (p <0.001). Concordantly, the patients in group 1 showed a greater improvement (p <0.001), compared with group 2 in terms of functional impairment (71.4 % vs 35 %) and radiological damage progression (23.8 % vs 10 %), resulting in a greater rate of CDC (19.4 % vs 5 %). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, an intensive treatment strategy by telemonitoring leads to more effective disease remission and more rapid CDC than treatment according to conventional management strategy in ERA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ISRCTN13142685 Date of registration: March, 17(th) 2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4818962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48189622016-04-04 Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach Salaffi, Fausto Carotti, Marina Ciapetti, Alessandro Di Carlo, Marco Gasparini, Stefania Farah, Sonia Gutierrez, Marwin BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The advent of Internet and World Wide Web has created new perspectives toward interaction between patients and healthcare professionals. Telemonitoring patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an emerging concept to guide the collaborative management treatment and improve outcomes in patients. The objective of this study was to investigate whether an intensive treatment strategy, according to a telemonitoring protocol, is more effective than conventional management strategy in reaching remission and comprehensive disease control (CDC) after 1 year in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients. METHODS: Forty-four ERA patients were randomly allocated into two groups: the telemonitoring intensive strategy (TIS) group (group 1) or the conventional strategy (CS) group (group 2). Three patients refused to participate. In group 1 (n = 21), a remote monitoring system of disease activity, in combination with protocolised treatment adjustments aiming for remission was applied. In group 2 (n = 20), patients were treated according to daily clinical practice, with regular evaluation of disease activity, but without protocolised treatment adjustments. A telemedical care called “REmote TElemonitoring for MAnaging Rheumatologic Condition and HEaltcare programmes” (RETE-MARCHE), was developed to perform the remote monitoring. RESULTS: A higher percentage of patients in the TIS group achieved CDAI remission vs patients in the CS group (38.1 % vs 25 % at year 1, p <0.01). Time to achieve remission was significantly shorter in the group 1 than in the group 2, with a median of 20 weeks vs a median over 36-weeks (p <0.001). Concordantly, the patients in group 1 showed a greater improvement (p <0.001), compared with group 2 in terms of functional impairment (71.4 % vs 35 %) and radiological damage progression (23.8 % vs 10 %), resulting in a greater rate of CDC (19.4 % vs 5 %). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, an intensive treatment strategy by telemonitoring leads to more effective disease remission and more rapid CDC than treatment according to conventional management strategy in ERA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ISRCTN13142685 Date of registration: March, 17(th) 2016 BioMed Central 2016-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4818962/ /pubmed/27038788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1002-2 Text en © Salaffi et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salaffi, Fausto
Carotti, Marina
Ciapetti, Alessandro
Di Carlo, Marco
Gasparini, Stefania
Farah, Sonia
Gutierrez, Marwin
Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach
title Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach
title_full Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach
title_short Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach
title_sort effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27038788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1002-2
work_keys_str_mv AT salaffifausto effectivenessofatelemonitoringintensivestrategyinearlyrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonwiththeconventionalmanagementapproach
AT carottimarina effectivenessofatelemonitoringintensivestrategyinearlyrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonwiththeconventionalmanagementapproach
AT ciapettialessandro effectivenessofatelemonitoringintensivestrategyinearlyrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonwiththeconventionalmanagementapproach
AT dicarlomarco effectivenessofatelemonitoringintensivestrategyinearlyrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonwiththeconventionalmanagementapproach
AT gasparinistefania effectivenessofatelemonitoringintensivestrategyinearlyrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonwiththeconventionalmanagementapproach
AT farahsonia effectivenessofatelemonitoringintensivestrategyinearlyrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonwiththeconventionalmanagementapproach
AT gutierrezmarwin effectivenessofatelemonitoringintensivestrategyinearlyrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonwiththeconventionalmanagementapproach