Cargando…

Effects of the Alternate Combination of “Error-Enhancing” and “Active Assistive” Robot-Mediated Treatments on Stroke Patients

This paper aimed at investigating the effects of a novel robotic-aided rehabilitation treatment for the recovery of the upper limb related capabilities in chronic post stroke patients. Eighteen post-stroke patients were enrolled in a six-week therapy program and divided into two groups. They were al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tropea, Peppino, Cesqui, Benedetta, Monaco, Vito, Aliboni, Sara, Posteraro, Federico, Micera, Silvestro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IEEE 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27170850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2013.2271898
_version_ 1782425165728055296
author Tropea, Peppino
Cesqui, Benedetta
Monaco, Vito
Aliboni, Sara
Posteraro, Federico
Micera, Silvestro
author_facet Tropea, Peppino
Cesqui, Benedetta
Monaco, Vito
Aliboni, Sara
Posteraro, Federico
Micera, Silvestro
author_sort Tropea, Peppino
collection PubMed
description This paper aimed at investigating the effects of a novel robotic-aided rehabilitation treatment for the recovery of the upper limb related capabilities in chronic post stroke patients. Eighteen post-stroke patients were enrolled in a six-week therapy program and divided into two groups. They were all required to perform horizontal pointing movements both in the presence of a robot-generated divergent force field (DF) that pushed their hands proportional to the trajectory error and perpendicular to the direction of motion, and according to the typical active assistive (AA) approach used in robotic therapy. We used a crossover experimental paradigm where the two groups switched from one therapy treatment to the other. The hypothesis underlying this paper was that the use of the destabilizing scenario forced the patient to keep the end-point position as close as possible to the ideal path, hence requiring a more active control of the arm with respect to the AA approach. Our findings confirmed this hypothesis. In addition, when the DF treatment was provided in the first therapy cycle, patients also showed straighter and smoother paths during the subsequent AA therapy cycle, while this was not true in the opposite case. In conclusion, the results herein reported provide evidence that the use of an unstable DF field can lead to better recovery outcomes, and therefore it potentially more effective than solely active assistance therapy alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher IEEE
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48192272016-05-11 Effects of the Alternate Combination of “Error-Enhancing” and “Active Assistive” Robot-Mediated Treatments on Stroke Patients Tropea, Peppino Cesqui, Benedetta Monaco, Vito Aliboni, Sara Posteraro, Federico Micera, Silvestro IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Article This paper aimed at investigating the effects of a novel robotic-aided rehabilitation treatment for the recovery of the upper limb related capabilities in chronic post stroke patients. Eighteen post-stroke patients were enrolled in a six-week therapy program and divided into two groups. They were all required to perform horizontal pointing movements both in the presence of a robot-generated divergent force field (DF) that pushed their hands proportional to the trajectory error and perpendicular to the direction of motion, and according to the typical active assistive (AA) approach used in robotic therapy. We used a crossover experimental paradigm where the two groups switched from one therapy treatment to the other. The hypothesis underlying this paper was that the use of the destabilizing scenario forced the patient to keep the end-point position as close as possible to the ideal path, hence requiring a more active control of the arm with respect to the AA approach. Our findings confirmed this hypothesis. In addition, when the DF treatment was provided in the first therapy cycle, patients also showed straighter and smoother paths during the subsequent AA therapy cycle, while this was not true in the opposite case. In conclusion, the results herein reported provide evidence that the use of an unstable DF field can lead to better recovery outcomes, and therefore it potentially more effective than solely active assistance therapy alone. IEEE 2013-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4819227/ /pubmed/27170850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2013.2271898 Text en 2168-2372 © 2013 IEEE
spellingShingle Article
Tropea, Peppino
Cesqui, Benedetta
Monaco, Vito
Aliboni, Sara
Posteraro, Federico
Micera, Silvestro
Effects of the Alternate Combination of “Error-Enhancing” and “Active Assistive” Robot-Mediated Treatments on Stroke Patients
title Effects of the Alternate Combination of “Error-Enhancing” and “Active Assistive” Robot-Mediated Treatments on Stroke Patients
title_full Effects of the Alternate Combination of “Error-Enhancing” and “Active Assistive” Robot-Mediated Treatments on Stroke Patients
title_fullStr Effects of the Alternate Combination of “Error-Enhancing” and “Active Assistive” Robot-Mediated Treatments on Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed Effects of the Alternate Combination of “Error-Enhancing” and “Active Assistive” Robot-Mediated Treatments on Stroke Patients
title_short Effects of the Alternate Combination of “Error-Enhancing” and “Active Assistive” Robot-Mediated Treatments on Stroke Patients
title_sort effects of the alternate combination of “error-enhancing” and “active assistive” robot-mediated treatments on stroke patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27170850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2013.2271898
work_keys_str_mv AT tropeapeppino effectsofthealternatecombinationoferrorenhancingandactiveassistiverobotmediatedtreatmentsonstrokepatients
AT cesquibenedetta effectsofthealternatecombinationoferrorenhancingandactiveassistiverobotmediatedtreatmentsonstrokepatients
AT monacovito effectsofthealternatecombinationoferrorenhancingandactiveassistiverobotmediatedtreatmentsonstrokepatients
AT alibonisara effectsofthealternatecombinationoferrorenhancingandactiveassistiverobotmediatedtreatmentsonstrokepatients
AT posterarofederico effectsofthealternatecombinationoferrorenhancingandactiveassistiverobotmediatedtreatmentsonstrokepatients
AT micerasilvestro effectsofthealternatecombinationoferrorenhancingandactiveassistiverobotmediatedtreatmentsonstrokepatients