Cargando…

Comparison of rapid immunodiagnosis assay kit with molecular and immunopathological approaches for diagnosis of rabies in cattle

AIM: Presently, diagnosis of rabies is primarily based on, conventional fluorescent antibody technique (FAT), immunopathological and molecular techniques. Recently, rapid immunodiagnostic assay (RIDA) - A monoclonal antibody-based technique has been introduced for rapid diagnosis of rabies. The pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Ajaz, Singh, C. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051193
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.107-112
_version_ 1782425179931017216
author Ahmad, Ajaz
Singh, C. K.
author_facet Ahmad, Ajaz
Singh, C. K.
author_sort Ahmad, Ajaz
collection PubMed
description AIM: Presently, diagnosis of rabies is primarily based on, conventional fluorescent antibody technique (FAT), immunopathological and molecular techniques. Recently, rapid immunodiagnostic assay (RIDA) - A monoclonal antibody-based technique has been introduced for rapid diagnosis of rabies. The present investigation is envisaged to study the efficacy of RIDA kit for the diagnosis of rabies in cattle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: About 11 brain samples from cattle, clinically suspected for rabies, were screened by the FAT, Heminested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (HnRT-PCR), Immunohistochemistry (IHC), and RIDA. RESULTS: The sensitivity for detection of rabies from brain tissue by RIDA was 85.7% as compared to 100% by IHC as well as HnRT-PCR. The accuracy of detection of rabies by RIDA was 91.6% as compared to 100% that of IHC and HnRT-PCR, whereas specificity of RIDA was 100% like that of the IHC and HnRT-PCR. CONCLUSION: Despite a comparatively low-sensitivity and accuracy of RIDA, latter can still be useful in screening a large number of field samples promptly. However, it is recommended that negative results with RIDA in cattle need to be authenticated by suitable alternative diagnostic approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48193422016-04-05 Comparison of rapid immunodiagnosis assay kit with molecular and immunopathological approaches for diagnosis of rabies in cattle Ahmad, Ajaz Singh, C. K. Vet World Research Article AIM: Presently, diagnosis of rabies is primarily based on, conventional fluorescent antibody technique (FAT), immunopathological and molecular techniques. Recently, rapid immunodiagnostic assay (RIDA) - A monoclonal antibody-based technique has been introduced for rapid diagnosis of rabies. The present investigation is envisaged to study the efficacy of RIDA kit for the diagnosis of rabies in cattle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: About 11 brain samples from cattle, clinically suspected for rabies, were screened by the FAT, Heminested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (HnRT-PCR), Immunohistochemistry (IHC), and RIDA. RESULTS: The sensitivity for detection of rabies from brain tissue by RIDA was 85.7% as compared to 100% by IHC as well as HnRT-PCR. The accuracy of detection of rabies by RIDA was 91.6% as compared to 100% that of IHC and HnRT-PCR, whereas specificity of RIDA was 100% like that of the IHC and HnRT-PCR. CONCLUSION: Despite a comparatively low-sensitivity and accuracy of RIDA, latter can still be useful in screening a large number of field samples promptly. However, it is recommended that negative results with RIDA in cattle need to be authenticated by suitable alternative diagnostic approaches. Veterinary World 2016-01 2016-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4819342/ /pubmed/27051193 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.107-112 Text en Copyright: © Ahmad and Singh. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ahmad, Ajaz
Singh, C. K.
Comparison of rapid immunodiagnosis assay kit with molecular and immunopathological approaches for diagnosis of rabies in cattle
title Comparison of rapid immunodiagnosis assay kit with molecular and immunopathological approaches for diagnosis of rabies in cattle
title_full Comparison of rapid immunodiagnosis assay kit with molecular and immunopathological approaches for diagnosis of rabies in cattle
title_fullStr Comparison of rapid immunodiagnosis assay kit with molecular and immunopathological approaches for diagnosis of rabies in cattle
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of rapid immunodiagnosis assay kit with molecular and immunopathological approaches for diagnosis of rabies in cattle
title_short Comparison of rapid immunodiagnosis assay kit with molecular and immunopathological approaches for diagnosis of rabies in cattle
title_sort comparison of rapid immunodiagnosis assay kit with molecular and immunopathological approaches for diagnosis of rabies in cattle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051193
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.107-112
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadajaz comparisonofrapidimmunodiagnosisassaykitwithmolecularandimmunopathologicalapproachesfordiagnosisofrabiesincattle
AT singhck comparisonofrapidimmunodiagnosisassaykitwithmolecularandimmunopathologicalapproachesfordiagnosisofrabiesincattle