Cargando…

Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines

AIM: Aim of the present study was to compare different methods, viz., Sheather's sugar flotation (SSF), Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN), Kinyoun's acid-fast method (KAF), safranin-methylene blue staining (SMB), and negative staining techniques such as nigrosin staining, light green staining, and malach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rekha, K. M. H., Puttalakshmamma, G. C., D’Souza, Placid E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051211
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.211-215
_version_ 1782425188379394048
author Rekha, K. M. H.
Puttalakshmamma, G. C.
D’Souza, Placid E.
author_facet Rekha, K. M. H.
Puttalakshmamma, G. C.
D’Souza, Placid E.
author_sort Rekha, K. M. H.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Aim of the present study was to compare different methods, viz., Sheather's sugar flotation (SSF), Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN), Kinyoun's acid-fast method (KAF), safranin-methylene blue staining (SMB), and negative staining techniques such as nigrosin staining, light green staining, and malachite green staining for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in bovines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 455 fecal samples from bovines were collected from private, government farms and from the clinical cases presented to Department of Medicine, Veterinary College, Bengaluru. They were subjected for SSF, ZN, KAF, SMB and negative staining methods. RESULTS: Out of 455 animal fecal samples screened 5.71% were found positive for Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts. The species were identified as Cryptosporidium parvum in calves and Cryptosporidium andersoni in adults based on the morphological characterization and micrometry of the oocysts. CONCLUSIONS: Of all the techniques, fecal flotation with sheather's was found to be more specific and sensitive method for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts. Among the conventional staining methods, the SMB gives better differentiation between oocysts and yeast. Among the three negative staining methods, malachite green was found sensitive over the other methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48193752016-04-05 Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines Rekha, K. M. H. Puttalakshmamma, G. C. D’Souza, Placid E. Vet World Research Article AIM: Aim of the present study was to compare different methods, viz., Sheather's sugar flotation (SSF), Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN), Kinyoun's acid-fast method (KAF), safranin-methylene blue staining (SMB), and negative staining techniques such as nigrosin staining, light green staining, and malachite green staining for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in bovines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 455 fecal samples from bovines were collected from private, government farms and from the clinical cases presented to Department of Medicine, Veterinary College, Bengaluru. They were subjected for SSF, ZN, KAF, SMB and negative staining methods. RESULTS: Out of 455 animal fecal samples screened 5.71% were found positive for Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts. The species were identified as Cryptosporidium parvum in calves and Cryptosporidium andersoni in adults based on the morphological characterization and micrometry of the oocysts. CONCLUSIONS: Of all the techniques, fecal flotation with sheather's was found to be more specific and sensitive method for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts. Among the conventional staining methods, the SMB gives better differentiation between oocysts and yeast. Among the three negative staining methods, malachite green was found sensitive over the other methods. Veterinary World 2016-02-27 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4819375/ /pubmed/27051211 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.211-215 Text en Copyright: © Rekha, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rekha, K. M. H.
Puttalakshmamma, G. C.
D’Souza, Placid E.
Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines
title Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines
title_full Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines
title_fullStr Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines
title_short Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines
title_sort comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051211
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.211-215
work_keys_str_mv AT rekhakmh comparisonofdifferentdiagnostictechniquesforthedetectionofcryptosporidiosisinbovines
AT puttalakshmammagc comparisonofdifferentdiagnostictechniquesforthedetectionofcryptosporidiosisinbovines
AT dsouzaplacide comparisonofdifferentdiagnostictechniquesforthedetectionofcryptosporidiosisinbovines