Cargando…

Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Observational Cohort Safety Studies: Reviewing Evidence from Databases on Two Continents

PURPOSE: Our objective was to highlight the importance of database selection in observational research and to determine the incidence of corticosteroid-related events in patients exposed to fluticasone propionate intranasal spray (FPNS) compared with other intranasal steroids (INS). METHODS: After a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Kourtney J., Hinds, David, Motsko, Stephen P., Goehring, Earl, Jones, Judith K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-015-0057-y
_version_ 1782425203802898432
author Davis, Kourtney J.
Hinds, David
Motsko, Stephen P.
Goehring, Earl
Jones, Judith K.
author_facet Davis, Kourtney J.
Hinds, David
Motsko, Stephen P.
Goehring, Earl
Jones, Judith K.
author_sort Davis, Kourtney J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Our objective was to highlight the importance of database selection in observational research and to determine the incidence of corticosteroid-related events in patients exposed to fluticasone propionate intranasal spray (FPNS) compared with other intranasal steroids (INS). METHODS: After a feasibility study using an electronic medical record database in the UK (1990–2002), a retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large administrative claims database in the USA from 1994 to 2002 comparing the incidence and rate ratios of steroid-related events among intermittent, sub-chronic, and chronic FPNS use and other INS use episodes. RESULTS: Most patients used INS intermittently; power was low to evaluate risk associated with chronic use. Significantly elevated adjusted rate ratios were observed in the US study comparing FPNS with other INS for hypercorticism, sinusitis, abscess, and empyema, as well as a significantly decreased rate ratio for cataracts. The US claims database provided greater granularity on covariates and markers of severity to improve control of confounding for this study and time period, but neither database was able to assess the indication for prescription and the UK study could not address the use of INS without a prescription. CONCLUSIONS: The FPNS results were consistent with the risk profile for INS and did not raise any new safety signals at the time of study conduct, which is consistent with the current safety profile. We were not able to discern the extent of potential off-label use of FPNS or other INS. Differences in the available data and healthcare systems highlight important considerations for database selection in the feasibility phase to assess the precision and limitations prior to formal risk evaluation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-015-0057-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48194702016-04-10 Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Observational Cohort Safety Studies: Reviewing Evidence from Databases on Two Continents Davis, Kourtney J. Hinds, David Motsko, Stephen P. Goehring, Earl Jones, Judith K. Drugs Real World Outcomes Original Research Article PURPOSE: Our objective was to highlight the importance of database selection in observational research and to determine the incidence of corticosteroid-related events in patients exposed to fluticasone propionate intranasal spray (FPNS) compared with other intranasal steroids (INS). METHODS: After a feasibility study using an electronic medical record database in the UK (1990–2002), a retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large administrative claims database in the USA from 1994 to 2002 comparing the incidence and rate ratios of steroid-related events among intermittent, sub-chronic, and chronic FPNS use and other INS use episodes. RESULTS: Most patients used INS intermittently; power was low to evaluate risk associated with chronic use. Significantly elevated adjusted rate ratios were observed in the US study comparing FPNS with other INS for hypercorticism, sinusitis, abscess, and empyema, as well as a significantly decreased rate ratio for cataracts. The US claims database provided greater granularity on covariates and markers of severity to improve control of confounding for this study and time period, but neither database was able to assess the indication for prescription and the UK study could not address the use of INS without a prescription. CONCLUSIONS: The FPNS results were consistent with the risk profile for INS and did not raise any new safety signals at the time of study conduct, which is consistent with the current safety profile. We were not able to discern the extent of potential off-label use of FPNS or other INS. Differences in the available data and healthcare systems highlight important considerations for database selection in the feasibility phase to assess the precision and limitations prior to formal risk evaluation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-015-0057-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4819470/ /pubmed/27747804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-015-0057-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Davis, Kourtney J.
Hinds, David
Motsko, Stephen P.
Goehring, Earl
Jones, Judith K.
Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Observational Cohort Safety Studies: Reviewing Evidence from Databases on Two Continents
title Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Observational Cohort Safety Studies: Reviewing Evidence from Databases on Two Continents
title_full Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Observational Cohort Safety Studies: Reviewing Evidence from Databases on Two Continents
title_fullStr Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Observational Cohort Safety Studies: Reviewing Evidence from Databases on Two Continents
title_full_unstemmed Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Observational Cohort Safety Studies: Reviewing Evidence from Databases on Two Continents
title_short Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Observational Cohort Safety Studies: Reviewing Evidence from Databases on Two Continents
title_sort intranasal fluticasone propionate observational cohort safety studies: reviewing evidence from databases on two continents
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-015-0057-y
work_keys_str_mv AT daviskourtneyj intranasalfluticasonepropionateobservationalcohortsafetystudiesreviewingevidencefromdatabasesontwocontinents
AT hindsdavid intranasalfluticasonepropionateobservationalcohortsafetystudiesreviewingevidencefromdatabasesontwocontinents
AT motskostephenp intranasalfluticasonepropionateobservationalcohortsafetystudiesreviewingevidencefromdatabasesontwocontinents
AT goehringearl intranasalfluticasonepropionateobservationalcohortsafetystudiesreviewingevidencefromdatabasesontwocontinents
AT jonesjudithk intranasalfluticasonepropionateobservationalcohortsafetystudiesreviewingevidencefromdatabasesontwocontinents