Cargando…

Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study

This randomised feasibility study aimed to examine the clinical and biomechanical effects of functional foot orthoses (FFOs) in the treatment of midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) and the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial. Participants with painful, radiographically confirmed mid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halstead, Jill, Chapman, Graham J., Gray, Janine C., Grainger, Andrew J., Brown, Sarah, Wilkins, Richard A., Roddy, Edward, Helliwell, Philip S., Keenan, Anne-Maree, Redmond, Anthony C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25917211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6
_version_ 1782425226027466752
author Halstead, Jill
Chapman, Graham J.
Gray, Janine C.
Grainger, Andrew J.
Brown, Sarah
Wilkins, Richard A.
Roddy, Edward
Helliwell, Philip S.
Keenan, Anne-Maree
Redmond, Anthony C.
author_facet Halstead, Jill
Chapman, Graham J.
Gray, Janine C.
Grainger, Andrew J.
Brown, Sarah
Wilkins, Richard A.
Roddy, Edward
Helliwell, Philip S.
Keenan, Anne-Maree
Redmond, Anthony C.
author_sort Halstead, Jill
collection PubMed
description This randomised feasibility study aimed to examine the clinical and biomechanical effects of functional foot orthoses (FFOs) in the treatment of midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) and the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial. Participants with painful, radiographically confirmed midfoot OA were recruited and randomised to receive either FFOs or a sham control orthosis. Feasibility measures included recruitment and attrition rates, practicality of blinding and adherence rates. Clinical outcome measures were: change from baseline to 12 weeks for severity of pain (numerical rating scale), foot function (Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index) and patient global impression of change scale. To investigate the biomechanical effect of foot orthoses, in-shoe foot kinematics and plantar pressures were evaluated at 12 weeks. Of the 119 participants screened, 37 were randomised and 33 completed the study (FFO = 18, sham = 15). Compliance with foot orthoses and blinding of the intervention was achieved in three quarters of the group. Both groups reported improvements in pain, function and global impression of change; the FFO group reporting greater improvements compared to the sham group. The biomechanical outcomes indicated the FFO group inverted the hindfoot and increased midfoot maximum plantar force compared to the sham group. The present findings suggest FFOs worn over 12 weeks may provide detectable clinical and biomechanical benefits compared to sham orthoses. This feasibility study provides useful clinical, biomechanical and statistical information for the design and implementation of a definitive randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of FFOs in treating painful midfoot OA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4819552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48195522016-04-10 Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study Halstead, Jill Chapman, Graham J. Gray, Janine C. Grainger, Andrew J. Brown, Sarah Wilkins, Richard A. Roddy, Edward Helliwell, Philip S. Keenan, Anne-Maree Redmond, Anthony C. Clin Rheumatol Original Article This randomised feasibility study aimed to examine the clinical and biomechanical effects of functional foot orthoses (FFOs) in the treatment of midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) and the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial. Participants with painful, radiographically confirmed midfoot OA were recruited and randomised to receive either FFOs or a sham control orthosis. Feasibility measures included recruitment and attrition rates, practicality of blinding and adherence rates. Clinical outcome measures were: change from baseline to 12 weeks for severity of pain (numerical rating scale), foot function (Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index) and patient global impression of change scale. To investigate the biomechanical effect of foot orthoses, in-shoe foot kinematics and plantar pressures were evaluated at 12 weeks. Of the 119 participants screened, 37 were randomised and 33 completed the study (FFO = 18, sham = 15). Compliance with foot orthoses and blinding of the intervention was achieved in three quarters of the group. Both groups reported improvements in pain, function and global impression of change; the FFO group reporting greater improvements compared to the sham group. The biomechanical outcomes indicated the FFO group inverted the hindfoot and increased midfoot maximum plantar force compared to the sham group. The present findings suggest FFOs worn over 12 weeks may provide detectable clinical and biomechanical benefits compared to sham orthoses. This feasibility study provides useful clinical, biomechanical and statistical information for the design and implementation of a definitive randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of FFOs in treating painful midfoot OA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer London 2015-04-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4819552/ /pubmed/25917211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Halstead, Jill
Chapman, Graham J.
Gray, Janine C.
Grainger, Andrew J.
Brown, Sarah
Wilkins, Richard A.
Roddy, Edward
Helliwell, Philip S.
Keenan, Anne-Maree
Redmond, Anthony C.
Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study
title Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study
title_full Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study
title_fullStr Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study
title_short Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study
title_sort foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25917211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6
work_keys_str_mv AT halsteadjill footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT chapmangrahamj footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT grayjaninec footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT graingerandrewj footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT brownsarah footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT wilkinsricharda footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT roddyedward footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT helliwellphilips footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT keenanannemaree footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT redmondanthonyc footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy