Cargando…
Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study
This randomised feasibility study aimed to examine the clinical and biomechanical effects of functional foot orthoses (FFOs) in the treatment of midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) and the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial. Participants with painful, radiographically confirmed mid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25917211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6 |
_version_ | 1782425226027466752 |
---|---|
author | Halstead, Jill Chapman, Graham J. Gray, Janine C. Grainger, Andrew J. Brown, Sarah Wilkins, Richard A. Roddy, Edward Helliwell, Philip S. Keenan, Anne-Maree Redmond, Anthony C. |
author_facet | Halstead, Jill Chapman, Graham J. Gray, Janine C. Grainger, Andrew J. Brown, Sarah Wilkins, Richard A. Roddy, Edward Helliwell, Philip S. Keenan, Anne-Maree Redmond, Anthony C. |
author_sort | Halstead, Jill |
collection | PubMed |
description | This randomised feasibility study aimed to examine the clinical and biomechanical effects of functional foot orthoses (FFOs) in the treatment of midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) and the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial. Participants with painful, radiographically confirmed midfoot OA were recruited and randomised to receive either FFOs or a sham control orthosis. Feasibility measures included recruitment and attrition rates, practicality of blinding and adherence rates. Clinical outcome measures were: change from baseline to 12 weeks for severity of pain (numerical rating scale), foot function (Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index) and patient global impression of change scale. To investigate the biomechanical effect of foot orthoses, in-shoe foot kinematics and plantar pressures were evaluated at 12 weeks. Of the 119 participants screened, 37 were randomised and 33 completed the study (FFO = 18, sham = 15). Compliance with foot orthoses and blinding of the intervention was achieved in three quarters of the group. Both groups reported improvements in pain, function and global impression of change; the FFO group reporting greater improvements compared to the sham group. The biomechanical outcomes indicated the FFO group inverted the hindfoot and increased midfoot maximum plantar force compared to the sham group. The present findings suggest FFOs worn over 12 weeks may provide detectable clinical and biomechanical benefits compared to sham orthoses. This feasibility study provides useful clinical, biomechanical and statistical information for the design and implementation of a definitive randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of FFOs in treating painful midfoot OA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4819552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48195522016-04-10 Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study Halstead, Jill Chapman, Graham J. Gray, Janine C. Grainger, Andrew J. Brown, Sarah Wilkins, Richard A. Roddy, Edward Helliwell, Philip S. Keenan, Anne-Maree Redmond, Anthony C. Clin Rheumatol Original Article This randomised feasibility study aimed to examine the clinical and biomechanical effects of functional foot orthoses (FFOs) in the treatment of midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) and the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial. Participants with painful, radiographically confirmed midfoot OA were recruited and randomised to receive either FFOs or a sham control orthosis. Feasibility measures included recruitment and attrition rates, practicality of blinding and adherence rates. Clinical outcome measures were: change from baseline to 12 weeks for severity of pain (numerical rating scale), foot function (Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index) and patient global impression of change scale. To investigate the biomechanical effect of foot orthoses, in-shoe foot kinematics and plantar pressures were evaluated at 12 weeks. Of the 119 participants screened, 37 were randomised and 33 completed the study (FFO = 18, sham = 15). Compliance with foot orthoses and blinding of the intervention was achieved in three quarters of the group. Both groups reported improvements in pain, function and global impression of change; the FFO group reporting greater improvements compared to the sham group. The biomechanical outcomes indicated the FFO group inverted the hindfoot and increased midfoot maximum plantar force compared to the sham group. The present findings suggest FFOs worn over 12 weeks may provide detectable clinical and biomechanical benefits compared to sham orthoses. This feasibility study provides useful clinical, biomechanical and statistical information for the design and implementation of a definitive randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of FFOs in treating painful midfoot OA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer London 2015-04-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4819552/ /pubmed/25917211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Halstead, Jill Chapman, Graham J. Gray, Janine C. Grainger, Andrew J. Brown, Sarah Wilkins, Richard A. Roddy, Edward Helliwell, Philip S. Keenan, Anne-Maree Redmond, Anthony C. Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study |
title | Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study |
title_full | Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study |
title_short | Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study |
title_sort | foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25917211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halsteadjill footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT chapmangrahamj footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT grayjaninec footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT graingerandrewj footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT brownsarah footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT wilkinsricharda footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT roddyedward footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT helliwellphilips footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT keenanannemaree footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT redmondanthonyc footorthosesinthetreatmentofsymptomaticmidfootosteoarthritisusingclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesarandomisedfeasibilitystudy |